refstack/specs
Catherine Diep cd49ae498c Identifies code that should either be deprecated or moved.
storyboard: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/110

At the Juno summit, we have learned of many other groups working
on things that overlap with Refstack.  This spec identifies code
that should either be deprecated or moved into other projects.

Change-Id: I040f3ac690344265e029815757322aff6e28d2cf
Co-Authored-By: David Lenwell <dlenwell@gmail.com>
2014-07-11 04:08:38 -07:00
..
approved Identifies code that should either be deprecated or moved. 2014-07-11 04:08:38 -07:00
proposed Use keystone uuid with cloud id 2014-06-26 13:23:38 -05:00
README.rst Remove executable flags 2014-05-13 16:32:01 +02:00
template.rst removed creative commons lic from template 2014-06-10 14:19:11 -07:00

Refstack Specifications

This folder is used to hold design specifications for additions to the Refstack project. Reviews of the specs are done in gerrit, using a similar workflow to how we review and merge changes to the code itself.

Specifications are proposed by adding an .rst file to the specs/proposed directory and posting it for review. Not all approved blueprints will get fully implemented. You can find an example spec in /specs/template.rst.

When a spec has passed the review process and discussions in our weekly meetings it will be moved to 'specs/approved/'. At that time the blueprint will be marked as approved and assigned to someone.

Once a spec has been fully implemented, meaning a patch has landed that references the blueprint, it will be moved again to 'specs/completed'.

Prior to April 2014, this method was not used for spec reviews. Prior reviews were completed entirely through Launchpad blueprints:

http://blueprints.launchpad.net/refstack

Please note, Launchpad blueprints are still used for tracking the current status of blueprints. For more information, see:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints

For more information about working with gerrit, see:

https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gerrit_Workflow

To validate that the specification is syntactically correct (i.e. get more confidence in the Jenkins result), please execute the following command:

$ tox