Introduce use case section
This will now require a separate section "Use Cases". This was originally within "Problem description", but use cases seems to be missed when it was filled out. This will hopefully improve spec submission. Change-Id: I3615ca5ff5c46851e682739a8343242e2f1b0a8d
This commit is contained in:
parent
865bd26898
commit
8ca13afc49
@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ this new filter can be useful.
|
|||||||
volumes as close to each other as possible, ideally on the same storage
|
volumes as close to each other as possible, ideally on the same storage
|
||||||
backend, for the sake of performance.
|
backend, for the sake of performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ the amount of I/O for a specific volume. QoS has been implemented for
|
|||||||
some cinder storage drivers, and it is feasible for the storwize driver
|
some cinder storage drivers, and it is feasible for the storwize driver
|
||||||
to add this feature as well.
|
to add this feature as well.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ If a MITM attack were to happen, the users data could be compromised.
|
|||||||
In a worst case scenario, users could be tricked into attaching or even
|
In a worst case scenario, users could be tricked into attaching or even
|
||||||
booting spoofed volumes containing malicious code.
|
booting spoofed volumes containing malicious code.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ Assumptions:
|
|||||||
only rely on the storage level quiesce in phase 1 because the freeze feature
|
only rely on the storage level quiesce in phase 1 because the freeze feature
|
||||||
mentioned above is not ready yet.
|
mentioned above is not ready yet.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -17,6 +17,9 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Integration for Datera storage is not available in OpenStack.
|
Integration for Datera storage is not available in OpenStack.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ been decided that this is not the case. In order to bring Cinder in
|
|||||||
line with other OpenStack components we need to remove translation
|
line with other OpenStack components we need to remove translation
|
||||||
from debug level log messages.
|
from debug level log messages.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ assumed there are many clients out there still supporting v1, as well as many
|
|||||||
deployed clouds still using v1 that would need to make some changes to ease the
|
deployed clouds still using v1 that would need to make some changes to ease the
|
||||||
switch.
|
switch.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ features will be added for VMAX.
|
|||||||
In previous release, masking view, storage group, and initiator group
|
In previous release, masking view, storage group, and initiator group
|
||||||
need to be created ahead of time. In Juno, this will be automated.
|
need to be created ahead of time. In Juno, this will be automated.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ The following new functionalities will be added in this update:
|
|||||||
* Storage-Assisted Volume Migration
|
* Storage-Assisted Volume Migration
|
||||||
* SP Toggle for HA
|
* SP Toggle for HA
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ It will support using any type of SMB share, including:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- vendor specific hardware exporting SMB shares.
|
- vendor specific hardware exporting SMB shares.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ API messages to also be returned in the language chosen by the user.
|
|||||||
This functionality is important to support the use of OpenStack by the
|
This functionality is important to support the use of OpenStack by the
|
||||||
international community.
|
international community.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Problem description
|
Problem description
|
||||||
===================
|
===================
|
||||||
|
@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ usable. e.g. When instances directly access to the storage and doesn't go
|
|||||||
through I/O scheduler of cinder control node, ionice cannot control I/O
|
through I/O scheduler of cinder control node, ionice cannot control I/O
|
||||||
priority and instances access may slow down.
|
priority and instances access may slow down.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
Currently there is no support for ZFS Storage Appliance product line from
|
Currently there is no support for ZFS Storage Appliance product line from
|
||||||
Openstack Cinder.
|
Openstack Cinder.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
iSCSI driver uses REST API to communicate out of band with the storage
|
iSCSI driver uses REST API to communicate out of band with the storage
|
||||||
|
@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ Therefore it is important to extend Cinder so that it is aware of storage
|
|||||||
pools within backend and also use them as finest granularity for resource
|
pools within backend and also use them as finest granularity for resource
|
||||||
placement.
|
placement.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
Currently, the Pure Storage FlashArray cannot be used a block storage backend
|
Currently, the Pure Storage FlashArray cannot be used a block storage backend
|
||||||
in an OpenStack environment.
|
in an OpenStack environment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ Also, we have plans for a few features that should come shortly:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
* Native snapshot management
|
* Native snapshot management
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ It will support using any type of SMB share, including:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
- vendor specific hardware exporting SMB shares.
|
- vendor specific hardware exporting SMB shares.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ exports provided from a gpfs server.
|
|||||||
* Lacking this capability will limit the end users from using remote gpfs
|
* Lacking this capability will limit the end users from using remote gpfs
|
||||||
NAS servers as a backend in OpenStack environment.
|
NAS servers as a backend in OpenStack environment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ backup reset state API.
|
|||||||
2. Resetting status from creating/restoring to error
|
2. Resetting status from creating/restoring to error
|
||||||
Directly change the backup status to 'error' without restart cinder-backup.
|
Directly change the backup status to 'error' without restart cinder-backup.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ Currently, cinder-backup doesn't support qcow2 format disk because the backup
|
|||||||
code assumes the source volume is a raw volume. The destination (i.e. swift,
|
code assumes the source volume is a raw volume. The destination (i.e. swift,
|
||||||
rbd) should absolutely remain universal across all volume back-ends.
|
rbd) should absolutely remain universal across all volume back-ends.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ for these volumes----three on volume-backend A, three on volume-backend-B. So
|
|||||||
that we can make full use of all volume-backends' IO capabilities to help
|
that we can make full use of all volume-backends' IO capabilities to help
|
||||||
improve volume-backends' IO balance and volumes' IO performance.
|
improve volume-backends' IO balance and volumes' IO performance.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ first place).
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
.. _engine: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/taskflow/engines.html
|
.. _engine: http://docs.openstack.org/developer/taskflow/engines.html
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ Currently, there is two policy.json files in cinder. One for cinder code,
|
|||||||
one for unit test code. It's not convenient for the developer and easy to
|
one for unit test code. It's not convenient for the developer and easy to
|
||||||
miss one.
|
miss one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ for the ``vmdk`` protocol and hence the attach\\detach fails for volumes
|
|||||||
created by the VMDK driver. This blueprint proposes adding support for
|
created by the VMDK driver. This blueprint proposes adding support for
|
||||||
``backup-create``\\ ``backup-restore`` for these volumes.
|
``backup-create``\\ ``backup-restore`` for these volumes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ While this blueprint focuses on volume replication, a related blueprint
|
|||||||
focuses on consistency groups, and replication would be extended to
|
focuses on consistency groups, and replication would be extended to
|
||||||
support it.
|
support it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Problem description
|
Problem description
|
||||||
===================
|
===================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ The following diagram shows the command and data paths.
|
|||||||
+----------------+ +-----------------+
|
+----------------+ +-----------------+
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ the outside (manager layer) it is not visible which functionality a driver
|
|||||||
implements. So the only way to discover that is to try to call a function of
|
implements. So the only way to discover that is to try to call a function of
|
||||||
a feature set and to see if it raises a ``NotImplementedError``.
|
a feature set and to see if it raises a ``NotImplementedError``.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ Other vendors have moved common, protocol-agnostic driver code into library
|
|||||||
modules and called those from the actual driver modules, which then become
|
modules and called those from the actual driver modules, which then become
|
||||||
very thin indirection layers. NetApp will take this approach as well.
|
very thin indirection layers. NetApp will take this approach as well.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ This work will also assist in supporting proper transitions between
|
|||||||
different phases of the snapshot create/delete process as we move
|
different phases of the snapshot create/delete process as we move
|
||||||
toward a state machine in Kilo.
|
toward a state machine in Kilo.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ Cinder is supposed to send the notifications to ceilometer to report the
|
|||||||
resource usage status. This notification support has been implemented for
|
resource usage status. This notification support has been implemented for
|
||||||
the volume and the volume snapshot, but not the backup.
|
the volume and the volume snapshot, but not the backup.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ chiscsi target is not currently supported by openstack
|
|||||||
* Manual intervention is currently required to export volumes, as cinder does
|
* Manual intervention is currently required to export volumes, as cinder does
|
||||||
not understand chiscsi target implementation.
|
not understand chiscsi target implementation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ There are a few problems that exists today in cinder:
|
|||||||
* There are multiple places where database calls are made in cinder, and this
|
* There are multiple places where database calls are made in cinder, and this
|
||||||
could result in race conditions.
|
could result in race conditions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
Cinder database. There's a limitation to this approach, however, because
|
Cinder database. There's a limitation to this approach, however, because
|
||||||
the size of the column is fixed.
|
the size of the column is fixed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ and lock acquisition techniques will likely not end in a correct solution. We
|
|||||||
will have to explore how to do this in a way that is *piecemeal* but also does
|
will have to explore how to do this in a way that is *piecemeal* but also does
|
||||||
not destabilize cinder more.
|
not destabilize cinder more.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ for years and years. To date, there is no "mechanism" to programatically
|
|||||||
purge the deleted data. The archive rows feature doesn't solve this.
|
purge the deleted data. The archive rows feature doesn't solve this.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Use Cases
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
----------
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Operators should have the ability to purge deleted rows, possibily on a
|
Operators should have the ability to purge deleted rows, possibily on a
|
||||||
schedule (cronjob) or as needed (Before an upgrade, prior to maintenance)
|
schedule (cronjob) or as needed (Before an upgrade, prior to maintenance)
|
||||||
|
@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ performance and maintaining:
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
* Storage usage utilization (low priority)
|
* Storage usage utilization (low priority)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ support additional filtering.
|
|||||||
The purpose of this blueprint is to make the filtering support consistent
|
The purpose of this blueprint is to make the filtering support consistent
|
||||||
across these APIs.
|
across these APIs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
since the majority of core projects support DB2 but Cinder does not
|
since the majority of core projects support DB2 but Cinder does not
|
||||||
yet.
|
yet.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ backends have this capability.
|
|||||||
A use case for this is storing target CHAP secrets so iSCSI initiators can
|
A use case for this is storing target CHAP secrets so iSCSI initiators can
|
||||||
do CHAP authentication against targets.
|
do CHAP authentication against targets.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ it was meant to be a standalone library that Cinder, Nova and any other
|
|||||||
project in OpenStack could use. Currently brick lives in a directory
|
project in OpenStack could use. Currently brick lives in a directory
|
||||||
inside of Cinder, which means that only Cinder can use it.
|
inside of Cinder, which means that only Cinder can use it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ actually used. There is also a maximum volume size of 500 GB. These details
|
|||||||
can be highly variable between vendors and even within different backend
|
can be highly variable between vendors and even within different backend
|
||||||
arrays from the same vendor.
|
arrays from the same vendor.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -29,6 +29,9 @@ local cinder-volume instance. This is technically not necessary for local
|
|||||||
volumes and also prevents drivers such as Ceph from participating in volume
|
volumes and also prevents drivers such as Ceph from participating in volume
|
||||||
migration operations.
|
migration operations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ values are. Having the ability to obtain the permissible volume type extra
|
|||||||
specs while creating or editing the extra specs will make this task easier and
|
specs while creating or editing the extra specs will make this task easier and
|
||||||
more user-friendly.
|
more user-friendly.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Currently, user can't access Huawei Dsware by Openstack Cinder.
|
Currently, user can't access Huawei Dsware by Openstack Cinder.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -49,6 +49,8 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
Currently, user can't access Huawei SDShypervisor by Openstack Cinder.
|
Currently, user can't access Huawei SDShypervisor by Openstack Cinder.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -21,6 +21,9 @@ entire volumes during backups will be resource intensive and do not scale well
|
|||||||
for larger deployments. This specification discusses implementation of
|
for larger deployments. This specification discusses implementation of
|
||||||
incremental backup feature in detail.
|
incremental backup feature in detail.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
================
|
================
|
||||||
Cinder backup API, by default uses Swift as its backend. When a volume is
|
Cinder backup API, by default uses Swift as its backend. When a volume is
|
||||||
|
@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ attach/detach will fail even though the other portal addresses is reachable.
|
|||||||
To enable nova-compute to fall-back to alternative portal addresses, cinder
|
To enable nova-compute to fall-back to alternative portal addresses, cinder
|
||||||
should tell the alternative portal addresses to nova.
|
should tell the alternative portal addresses to nova.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ portal is unaccessible due to network trouble.
|
|||||||
that the session to the main portal can be re-established when the network
|
that the session to the main portal can be re-established when the network
|
||||||
is recovered.)
|
is recovered.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ The current global config has some issues.
|
|||||||
consumed. From the viewpoint of QoS (to keep bandwidth for access from
|
consumed. From the viewpoint of QoS (to keep bandwidth for access from
|
||||||
instances), we should limit total volume copy bandwidth per backend.
|
instances), we should limit total volume copy bandwidth per backend.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -39,6 +39,9 @@ respects:
|
|||||||
* vHBAs may be turned online, or offline. Offline vHBAs need to be
|
* vHBAs may be turned online, or offline. Offline vHBAs need to be
|
||||||
ignored.
|
ignored.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ that assumes the limitation of a single volume to a single instance.
|
|||||||
see nova/volume/cinder.py: check_attach()
|
see nova/volume/cinder.py: check_attach()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Use Cases
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
---------
|
=========
|
||||||
Allow users to share volumes between multiple guests using either
|
Allow users to share volumes between multiple guests using either
|
||||||
read-write or read-only attachments. Clustered applications
|
read-write or read-only attachments. Clustered applications
|
||||||
with two nodes where one is active and one is passive. Both
|
with two nodes where one is active and one is passive. Both
|
||||||
|
@ -36,6 +36,8 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
by the POSIX filesystem driver (currently in review, see [3]
|
by the POSIX filesystem driver (currently in review, see [3]
|
||||||
and [4]).
|
and [4]).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ driver.
|
|||||||
* delete snapshot
|
* delete snapshot
|
||||||
* clone from snapshot
|
* clone from snapshot
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ Benefits:
|
|||||||
* Reduce the IO pressure on cinder-volume host when doing the
|
* Reduce the IO pressure on cinder-volume host when doing the
|
||||||
copy_volume_to_image operation.
|
copy_volume_to_image operation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ subscription ratio is 2.0. If no volumes have been provisioned yet,
|
|||||||
the apparent_available_capacity is 100 x 2.0 = 200. If 50G volumes have
|
the apparent_available_capacity is 100 x 2.0 = 200. If 50G volumes have
|
||||||
already been provisioned, the apparent_available_capacity is 200 - 50 = 150.
|
already been provisioned, the apparent_available_capacity is 200 - 50 = 150.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ Some volume types should only be restricted. Examples are test volume types
|
|||||||
where a new technology is being tried out or ultra high performance volumes
|
where a new technology is being tried out or ultra high performance volumes
|
||||||
for special needs where most users should not be able to select these volumes.
|
for special needs where most users should not be able to select these volumes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ The configuration system for NFS/GlusterFS/etc drivers:
|
|||||||
* is more complex than necessary
|
* is more complex than necessary
|
||||||
* limits functionality such as migration
|
* limits functionality such as migration
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ Benefits:
|
|||||||
By using import snapshots function to import snapshots, we could first
|
By using import snapshots function to import snapshots, we could first
|
||||||
delete the import snapshots, and then delete the import volumes.
|
delete the import snapshots, and then delete the import volumes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
This code duplication causes instability in the iSER driver code, when new
|
This code duplication causes instability in the iSER driver code, when new
|
||||||
features or changes are added to the iSCSI driver flow.
|
features or changes are added to the iSCSI driver flow.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ looking up rich information about the metadata from the definition catalog
|
|||||||
to display information to users and admins. This can include metadata about
|
to display information to users and admins. This can include metadata about
|
||||||
software on the volume.
|
software on the volume.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ to take backup into account:
|
|||||||
of backup storage back-end, it would cause cinder-backup in the state of
|
of backup storage back-end, it would cause cinder-backup in the state of
|
||||||
rejecting service.
|
rejecting service.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ tests for these scripts can help prevent issues similar to
|
|||||||
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79791/, where a non-existent module was
|
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/79791/, where a non-existent module was
|
||||||
imported. Furthermore, it increases the test coverage for each cinder script.
|
imported. Furthermore, it increases the test coverage for each cinder script.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ horizon in a meaningful way by restricting the set of permissible states that
|
|||||||
the administrator can specify for a volume. There is no API for this, and it
|
the administrator can specify for a volume. There is no API for this, and it
|
||||||
is undesirable to hardcode this information into horizon.
|
is undesirable to hardcode this information into horizon.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ This means the data plane does not go through emulations, which can slow down
|
|||||||
I/O performance. Cinder today does not provide an option for taking advantage
|
I/O performance. Cinder today does not provide an option for taking advantage
|
||||||
of the Linux vHost driver.
|
of the Linux vHost driver.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ upload/download of virtual disks. The VMware drivers for nova, glance and
|
|||||||
ceilometer have already integrated with oslo.vmware. This spec proposes
|
ceilometer have already integrated with oslo.vmware. This spec proposes
|
||||||
the integration of VMDK driver with oslo.vmware.
|
the integration of VMDK driver with oslo.vmware.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ has retrieved from the server. The items in this table need to be sorted
|
|||||||
by status first and by display name second. In order to retrieve data in
|
by status first and by display name second. In order to retrieve data in
|
||||||
this order, the APIs must accept multiple sort keys/directions.
|
this order, the APIs must accept multiple sort keys/directions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
default volume type or None. There is no way for a user to find out
|
default volume type or None. There is no way for a user to find out
|
||||||
what is the default volume type.
|
what is the default volume type.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ Problem description
|
|||||||
Currently no volume driver for X-IO ISE storage available in any release
|
Currently no volume driver for X-IO ISE storage available in any release
|
||||||
branch.
|
branch.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -34,6 +34,9 @@ The volume will be updated to align with the new type accordingly.
|
|||||||
Thin allocation support:
|
Thin allocation support:
|
||||||
Allow the end user to specify that the volume should be thinly allocated.
|
Allow the end user to specify that the volume should be thinly allocated.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -52,14 +52,15 @@ Some notes about using this template:
|
|||||||
Problem description
|
Problem description
|
||||||
===================
|
===================
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A detailed description of the problem:
|
A detailed description of the problem. What problem is this blueprint
|
||||||
|
addressing?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* For a new feature this might be use cases. Ensure you are clear about the
|
Use Cases
|
||||||
actors in each use case: End User vs Deployer
|
=========
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* For a major reworking of something existing it would describe the
|
|
||||||
problems in that feature that are being addressed.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
What use cases does this address? What impact on actors does this change have?
|
||||||
|
Ensure you're clear about the actors in each use case: Developer, end user,
|
||||||
|
deployer, etc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposed change
|
Proposed change
|
||||||
===============
|
===============
|
||||||
|
@ -39,11 +39,13 @@ class TestTitles(testtools.TestCase):
|
|||||||
return titles
|
return titles
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def _check_titles(self, spec, titles):
|
def _check_titles(self, spec, titles):
|
||||||
self.assertEqual(7, len(titles),
|
self.assertEqual(8, len(titles),
|
||||||
"Titles count in '%s' doesn't match expected" % spec)
|
"Titles count in '%s' doesn't match expected" % spec)
|
||||||
problem = 'Problem description'
|
problem = 'Problem description'
|
||||||
self.assertIn(problem, titles)
|
self.assertIn(problem, titles)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
self.assertIn('Use Cases', titles)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
proposed = 'Proposed change'
|
proposed = 'Proposed change'
|
||||||
self.assertIn(proposed, titles)
|
self.assertIn(proposed, titles)
|
||||||
self.assertIn('Alternatives', titles[proposed])
|
self.assertIn('Alternatives', titles[proposed])
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user