Merge "Adding wanghao candidacy for Zaqar"
This commit is contained in:
commit
41158808d7
39
candidates/rocky/Zaqar/wanghao.txt
Normal file
39
candidates/rocky/Zaqar/wanghao.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||||||
|
Hi all,
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It's very pleasure for me that being a Zaqar developer from 2016, and also
|
||||||
|
being a core for several cycles. Today, I'd like to serve Zaqar better as a
|
||||||
|
PTL, if you let me.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We did a great job in Queens. Support the new relationship between pool and
|
||||||
|
flavor to make removing useless pool group available. We also introduce some
|
||||||
|
awesome new features like support redis as management storage backed to
|
||||||
|
improve performance and ease of deployment and delay queue.
|
||||||
|
For Rocky release, I want to finish the list of job below.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Refactoring
|
||||||
|
We want to remove useless pool group totally in Rock and make the model of
|
||||||
|
pool and flavor more clear.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. Scalability
|
||||||
|
We will continue our work to improve Zaqar's performance under the different
|
||||||
|
cases of load increasing:
|
||||||
|
1) number of publishers
|
||||||
|
2) number of subscribers
|
||||||
|
3) rate of messages published or consumed
|
||||||
|
4) number of messages
|
||||||
|
5) number of queues
|
||||||
|
6) size of messages
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. Usability
|
||||||
|
Now Zaqar still don't support the filter query of queues. Considering the
|
||||||
|
amount of queues in cloud environment,we want to support the filter query
|
||||||
|
to improve the usability and efficiency of querying API.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
3. Security
|
||||||
|
In Rocky, we also want to introduce some features that could make the
|
||||||
|
message more safe and queue more reliable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It's a fantastic experience working with this amazing team and I would be
|
||||||
|
pleased to serve as PTL for next cycle and I'd appreciate your vote.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thanks for your consideration!
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user