openstack/election
Code Issues Proposed changes

Adding Melanie Witt candidacy for Nova

Browse Source 
Change-Id: I3bfc293157c1ab9f3748f0af32e583c65be547c4
This commit is contained in:
melanie witt 2018-02-01 01:25:25 +00:00
parent 73fac65166
commit 8de90802a0
1 changed files with 99 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

99
candidates/rocky/Nova/melwitt.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
Hello Stackers,
I would like to announce my candidacy for Nova PTL in the Rocky cycle.
I have been a core reviewer on Nova since May 2015 and have been working with
OpenStack since mid 2012 (ancient times!) and you may know me on IRC as
melwitt. I have been both a user and a developer on OpenStack, so I think I see
things from a bit more of an all-around perspective. I’ve worked in a company
where we ran private OpenStack clouds, so I’ve done deployments, I’ve debugged
production issues, I’ve worked on custom internal-only patches -- you name it.
Having experienced all of these situations has given me a special interest in
solving problems for users, operators, and developers. It has been my mission
to work with all of you to help make Nova better.
Like Matt, I see the Nova PTL role as a service position to the community. The
PTL is there to help the team get things done in Nova. That means keeping track
of the schedule, keeping tabs on ongoing work and helping people make progress
if they’re stuck, facilitating cross-project communication when we’re working
on things that integrate with other projects, and easing contribution to the
project.
On the last point, I have some ideas around easing contribution, mostly having
to do with situations where someone may have researched a bug, found a root
cause, and can propose a patch, but don’t have the time or knowhow to provide a
patch complete with test coverage. In cases I have seen, I reached out to the
person and asked if they would mind if I wrote tests for their patch and added
myself as co-author. Not only did they not mind, they were happy I offered. So,
as an experiment, I would like to keep a list of patches (in the Priorities
etherpad) where authors add links to patches they’d like help with in exchange
for co-authorship. If a more experienced contributor finds a patch in the list
that they’re interested in, they can jump in and fill in the gaps so we end up
with a complete patch ready-for-review. In this way, I would like to try to
give less experienced authors the opportunity to pair with more experienced
authors on patches.
Speaking of the Priorities etherpad [1], I’d like to bring it back to active
use. It’s a good way IMHO to track ready-for-review patches on the various
sub-teams, virt drivers, and blueprints that we have. I think we have been good
at reviewing high priority project patch sets but I think we could use more
focus on reviewing lower priority blueprint work. I’d like to add a section for
approved blueprints to increase visibility on those patches, so that
ready-for-review patches don’t get lost in the shuffle. Regretfully, there have
been a number of blueprint patches that were ready for review early on in the
cycle and did not receive review for lack of visibility. I’d like to do
something to keep track of those patches and get the ball rolling on review
earlier in the cycle, before the higher priority work ramps up too much. I
think keeping a section in the Priorities etherpad for these could help, along
with a brief report/reminder of that section’s status in Nova meetings.
Bug triage has fallen a bit behind in more recent cycles and I’ve been thinking
about how we could improve that. In the past, we had a model where we tag bugs
with an area (like ‘api’, ‘compute’, ‘volumes’) and tag owners [2] were
responsible for triaging bugs with their tag. The idea is that bug tagging
(categorizing) is a quick and simple task that doesn’t require much time. Then,
the more time-consuming task of triaging the validity and severity of bugs is
load-balanced among tag owners. I’d like to refresh the bug tag owner list and
see if we can get back into a pattern where we can spread out bug triage among
the team and make more progress there.
Another area that could be improved is our communication of “low hanging fruit”
work suitable for newer contributors. To be honest, I don’t find much in Nova
to be “low hanging fruit” but do want to make an effort to collect and maintain
a list of bugs and tasks that are better starting points for people who want to
work on Nova. Long ago, we had the low-hanging-fruit etherpad [3] and I’d like
to resurrect it to keep track of things that newer contributors could pick up.
I think Matt has done great work to increase communication across projects we
integrate with and with the operator community. I would like to continue that
work to maintain those relationships and continue to keep the operator
community apprised of changes in Nova that will affect them. I know we are not
perfect here but we endeavor to keep the communication lines open and I, for
one, welcome feedback on areas we fall short so that we can improve.
We got a lot done in Queens, completing 36 out of 42 approved blueprints. I
would like to keep that momentum going into the Rocky cycle. I have liked the
model of using the PTG to discuss and prioritize work for the cycle and
maintaining a detailed PTG etherpad to organize the agenda, document action
items, next steps, and conclusions for each topic. I think this model is
especially helpful for those who cannot attend the PTG in person, in that they
can present their topic for discussion by adding it to the etherpad, we discuss
it at the PTG, and then we can follow up asynchronously afterward on IRC or the
dev mailing list.
Finally, testing and the health of the gate is important to me and I would like
to continue the work we’ve done here to actively monitor our test jobs,
increase our test coverage, and troubleshoot and solve issues in the gate so
that everyone can get their patches tested and merged smoothly. I know things
have been challenging in this area lately, but we’ve all worked hard as a team
to jump on each problem as it crops up and I’ve been proud of how much everyone
has stepped up to help.
I feel like I’ve written a lot here, thank you for reading and I appreciate
your consideration.
-melanie
[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/pike-nova-priorities-tracking
[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage#Tag_Owner_List
[3] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-low-hanging-fruit