tc candidacy - gordon chung
Change-Id: I7782a399c0b19771e36ce62ca45622e3c47df7ff
This commit is contained in:
parent
d29719a30d
commit
b9d17dc226
35
candidates/newton/TC/gordon_chung.txt
Normal file
35
candidates/newton/TC/gordon_chung.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
||||
hi folks,
|
||||
|
||||
i'd like to announce my candidacy for the OpenStack Technical Committee.
|
||||
|
||||
as a quick introduction, i've been a contributor in OpenStack for the past few
|
||||
years, focused primarily on various Telemetry and Oslo related projects. i was
|
||||
recently the Project Team Liaison for the Telemetry project, and currently,
|
||||
i'm an engineer at Huawei Technologies Canada where i work with a team of
|
||||
developers that contribute to the OpenStack community.
|
||||
|
||||
my views on what the next steps for OpenStack are are not unique. i share the
|
||||
idea: OpenStack needs to refine its mission. this is not to dissuade
|
||||
developers from continuing to build upon and extend the existing projects but i
|
||||
think OpenStack should concern itself with the core story first before worrying
|
||||
about extended use cases.
|
||||
|
||||
Also, i believe that the existing projects in OpenStack are too siloed. coming
|
||||
from a project that interacts with all other services, it's quite apparent
|
||||
that projects are focused solely on their own offerings and ignoring how it
|
||||
works globally. tighter collaboration between projects i believe will help make
|
||||
integration easier and more efficient. similar to how services within a project
|
||||
just work together, projects should just work together.
|
||||
|
||||
in many ways i see the Technical Committee as the Cross Project Liaisons some
|
||||
of us are searching for. rather than act as Guardians of "what is OpenStack", i
|
||||
think the TC should take a more active role in the projects and work together
|
||||
with the PTLs to ensure that the "Cloud" story makes sense. PTLs and TC members
|
||||
should work side by side to identify gaps in the story rather than the current
|
||||
interaction agreement of "you're in. we'll talk if stuff hits the fan".
|
||||
|
||||
understandly the Cloud story is different to many people so i'll employ the
|
||||
strategy i've used previously: listen to others, share the decision, share the
|
||||
blame, and claim the success.
|
||||
|
||||
thanks for you time.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user