Add Radosław Piliszek candidacy for TC election
Change-Id: Ic8b370b5f41340d24b969d8513c4e51223f8fdda
This commit is contained in:
parent
3caa2400c6
commit
d99b95d0e0
79
candidates/victoria/TC/radoslaw.piliszek@gmail.com
Normal file
79
candidates/victoria/TC/radoslaw.piliszek@gmail.com
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
||||
Dear Fellow OpenStackers,
|
||||
|
||||
I am Radosław Piliszek (yoctozepto) and I am proposing myself as a TC
|
||||
candidate starting Victoria cycle.
|
||||
For the record, I have never been in TC nor a PTL... yet.
|
||||
|
||||
I am affiliated with a relatively small Polish university: University of
|
||||
Białystok, with the local Computing Centre offering services to local
|
||||
academics. My experience is broad in that this work involves being
|
||||
a whole IT department at once. :-)
|
||||
|
||||
OpenStack piqued my interest in 2018 when I joined the Foundation as
|
||||
an individual member. Since then I made myself COA (Certified OpenStack
|
||||
Administrator), learnt the jump from "administrator" to "operator" while
|
||||
deploying locally various PoC instances of basic OpenStack services and
|
||||
finally started contributing upstream via bug reports, patches and
|
||||
reviews. I was (and am!) really proud to have been recognized Kolla core
|
||||
due to my work with fellow project members. Later on, DevStack core
|
||||
nomination followed for which I am grateful as well.
|
||||
|
||||
In the Kolla project I work mostly on ensuring sanity, enhancing testing
|
||||
and fixing current issues while helping fellow contributors to deliver
|
||||
their features and fixes. I also managed to deliver a bigger change
|
||||
in the Train cycle: all-around IPv6-only networking support.
|
||||
|
||||
I enjoyed the cross-project aspect of this and decided to contribute
|
||||
a bit to the development experience as well and this is how I ended up
|
||||
DevStack core (true story).
|
||||
|
||||
Nowadays I am wearing multiple hats in the wide community and many of
|
||||
you probably recognize me from IRC where I try to be helpful but also
|
||||
ask questions around (often technical ones like: to be or not to be?).
|
||||
One could say I'm inquisitive (hopefully in the good sense of this word)
|
||||
and in fact I value highly a deeper insight into the problem at hand
|
||||
(probably due to bad experience with hasty actions!). I react to issues
|
||||
quite quickly (bothering infra from time to time - I am really sorry,
|
||||
you folks are doing great job!) and work on solutions with fellow
|
||||
OpenStackers (aka you) which brings real joy and makes experience real.
|
||||
|
||||
I have a few, rather broad, goals (or thoughts?) of mine:
|
||||
|
||||
1) To test, test and test. My motto is: "not tested = not working".
|
||||
Unfortunately, this is actually often the case in reality. :-(
|
||||
Hence, I encourage thorough testing, especially at the functional
|
||||
and integration level.
|
||||
I believe we need to be reliable to be trustworthy.
|
||||
|
||||
2) To make OpenStack easily consumable by small companies, especially
|
||||
in public academia but not only. Everyone deserves a good private
|
||||
cloud experience with decent learning curve. This involves prompt
|
||||
and current documentation but also reliable base for installs.
|
||||
|
||||
(1) and (2) culminate in (3) [1+2=3 - could not have been simpler!]
|
||||
|
||||
3) Who are we? BUILDERS! What do we want? TO BUILD!
|
||||
(I hope you know the meme!)
|
||||
Ultimately OpenStack is software built for specific purpose and is
|
||||
meant to be consumed by cloud operators. We have plenty of ways to
|
||||
get OpenStack "installed" but officially we still rely on the archaic
|
||||
assumption that everything is thrown in the same environment. This is
|
||||
rarely the case nowadays due to various layers of separation being
|
||||
applied: virtual envs, OCI images. It would be beneficial to be able
|
||||
to rely on prebuilt official images of OpenStack services and their
|
||||
prerequisites, also for CI. We don't need to rebuild/reinstall
|
||||
keystone, glance, nova and swift just to test neutron that one more
|
||||
time, only to discover pip hangs installing dep of dep of not-even-
|
||||
neutron due to random networking issue.* Similarly this is wasted
|
||||
effort in case of multinode testing. Multiply this by the amount
|
||||
of scenarios and... well, you probably get the picture. I know
|
||||
we can do better: deliver more reliability via more reliability.
|
||||
|
||||
* Order random for example purposes.
|
||||
|
||||
This is as many relevant bits as I thought necessary to introduce
|
||||
my candidacy and share my mind with you.
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for reaching this far.
|
||||
|
||||
Radosław Piliszek (yoctozepto)
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user