diff --git a/candidates/rocky/TC/sean.mcginnis@gmail.com b/candidates/rocky/TC/sean.mcginnis@gmail.com
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e3e04c41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/candidates/rocky/TC/sean.mcginnis@gmail.com
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+Hey everyone,
+
+I am announcing my candidacy to continue on the OpenStack Technical Committee.
+
+I am employed by Huawei and lucky enough to have a full-time focus on
+OpenStack. I have been contributing since the Icehouse release. I served as
+Cinder PTL from Mitaka through Pike, and was elected to the TC last spring. I
+am currently serving my second cycle as Release Management PTL.
+
+During the last year on the TC, I have tried to be pragmatic and open to reason
+on governance changes. I do think some proposals need healthy debate with a
+really long term mindset to understand how changes now can impact our community
+long term. I also think we need to pay a lot of attention to how proposals
+impact the sometimes seemingly minor affect they will have on all those
+currently involved, and how it impacts developer happiness and the attraction
+of working on an OpenStack project.
+
+I've learned a lot from the other TC members and others participating in these
+discussions. This last year has been very rewarding, and I've been glad to do
+my part to move these conversations forward.
+
+My voting on past changes can be perused here:
+
+https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/governance+reviewedby:%22Sean+McGinnis+%253Csean.mcginnis%2540gmail.com%253E%22
+
+Outside of specific governance proposals, I have been working on getting
+involved in the operators community by attending the last few Ops Meetups to be
+able to get face to face with more of the folks actually using OpenStack. I've
+found it very valuable to hear directly about what kinds of issues are being
+run into and what kinds of things we might be able to change on the development
+side to make things better.
+
+Part of the outcome of that has led me to be more interested in our stable
+policy, and helping out more with stable branch reviews. Many operators are not
+able to get to a version, for one reason or another, until we have deleted the
+branch upstream. I was happy to support our recent efforts in changing out
+stable policies to allow a bigger window that might allow a resurgence in
+interest for some of these older branches once more users are actually able to
+run them and find issues.
+
+I do think it is good to have some new faces on the TC, but would love to serve
+another term. I feel like the first year was partly just getting settled in,
+and I would be very happy to continue to serve another term to keep things
+going. OpenStack has been one of the best communities I've been involved in,
+and I would love the opportunity to continue to do what I can to help support
+it and help it grow.
+
+Thank you for your consideration.
+
+Sean