Merge "Clarkb for TC"
This commit is contained in:
commit
edf4109a8a
32
candidates/ocata/TC/clarkb.txt
Normal file
32
candidates/ocata/TC/clarkb.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
I am standing as a candidate for a seat on the OpenStack Technical
|
||||
Committee.
|
||||
|
||||
I have worked with OpenStack since the Diablo days and have done it
|
||||
full time since joining the OpenStack Infrastructure team during the
|
||||
Folsom cycle. During this time I have been an OpenStack developer,
|
||||
operator, and user.
|
||||
|
||||
During the Newton cycle the TC began to work on community wide goals.
|
||||
I agree with Doug and others that this is a very important step for the
|
||||
TC and OpenStack to take. We should be able to collaborate on and
|
||||
solve large scale issues that affect our community.
|
||||
|
||||
That said, I recognize that at the end of the day someone has to be
|
||||
making these changes. I have previously been involved in many community
|
||||
wide changes including parallelized unittesting, ElasticSearch and
|
||||
elastic-recheck, multinode testing, and most recently running our tests
|
||||
with TLS enabled. I know how difficult changes like this can be. Getting
|
||||
the critical mass of interest needed for reviews to happen and debugging
|
||||
when things go wrong can be very difficult. If I am elected to the TC my
|
||||
mission will be to ensure these goals get the visibility required to be
|
||||
successful, and that we actually work together to achieve these goals as
|
||||
a community.
|
||||
|
||||
As an individual one of the best things about OpenStack for me is that
|
||||
I get to develop and use Free Software that solves real world problems
|
||||
for both myself and others. I think the best way for us to continue to
|
||||
do this is by working together to solve the hard technical problems we
|
||||
face. Let's make it happen.
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you,
|
||||
Clark
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user