jokke_'s candidacy as Glance PTL
Change-Id: I417d6067f8eaff1a6859b7169e554f36bca4c338
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf370b2ccc
commit
f7a710c335
76
candidates/rocky/Glance/jokke_.txt
Normal file
76
candidates/rocky/Glance/jokke_.txt
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
|
||||
Hi all,
|
||||
|
||||
I would like to take the opportunity to announce my candidacy for
|
||||
Glance PTL for Rocky cycle.
|
||||
|
||||
I've been working primarily with Glance since Icehouse and do work
|
||||
full-time on Glance upstream. During that time I've served community in
|
||||
stable and release liaison roles, as Glance and Glance stable core
|
||||
reviewer and part of Glance bugs, drivers and security teams. I've been
|
||||
part of team running Glance in sizeable public cloud and been part of
|
||||
development of couple deployment tools: Helion lifecycle manager and
|
||||
TripleO. Needless to say that production stability and scale has always
|
||||
been on the top of my priority list. Thus it's likely not a surprise
|
||||
that I like to identify the high points of my contributions being the
|
||||
work to get Images API v2 production ready and lately driving the
|
||||
efforts on Image Import Refactoring that provides the new Interoperable
|
||||
Image Import that changes how images are brought into Glance by our
|
||||
end users. Both things making sure that Glance stays as integral part
|
||||
of OpenStack deployments and we as community do not need to reinvent
|
||||
wheel to get image service that can be trusted in future production
|
||||
deployments.
|
||||
|
||||
I've seen lots of the highs and lows of the Glance (community/project)
|
||||
and am super proud that we've survived them and the fact that we're
|
||||
still going strong. Same time the two last cycles have thought me an
|
||||
important lesson, I'm not at my best writing code no matter how much I
|
||||
like it and I cannot take full time support role and full time writing
|
||||
code. The support side enabling the people better suitable for writing
|
||||
the code is definitely the part of my contributions where I shine more.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus I'd like to take the support role for Rocky cycle as PTL and focus
|
||||
my efforts to make sure we as a community keep going strong into the
|
||||
future cycles and the people who do shine brighter writing the code
|
||||
than I do could focus more of their time to that. Obviously that would
|
||||
not mean that I'd be taking distance to the development and driving the
|
||||
efforts or stop writing code all together. It's more of a matter where
|
||||
should I prioritize my time?
|
||||
|
||||
So where do I see our focus for the foreseeable future?
|
||||
|
||||
* Strengthening the community needs to be at the top of our priority
|
||||
list. While we're afloat and the team is operational we are by no
|
||||
means at the optimal point of Glance developement. Enabling new
|
||||
contributors to be effective and successful is important work that
|
||||
needs to keep happening.
|
||||
|
||||
* Bug and stable work needs to pick up at my own part again. I've been
|
||||
leaving that way too light lately and as team we haven't taken care
|
||||
of our stable branches as well as we should.
|
||||
|
||||
* We need to work on finishing the work we're committing to and
|
||||
prioritized. This also highlights the fact that we need more hands
|
||||
on the deck as if everyone is focusing on putting out fires, it does
|
||||
not matter how much we want to prioritize the work that is happening.
|
||||
|
||||
* When the crew is running light it's even more important to listen
|
||||
our user comminuty to what prioritize. we need to keep focusing on
|
||||
features and fixes that are actually needed and keep the nice to
|
||||
have stuff on the correct level of efforts.
|
||||
|
||||
* On the technical side I see our priorities being strengthening the
|
||||
Image Import so that it can be fully relied on production. We need
|
||||
to make sure that our tools are operational for upgrades and the
|
||||
lifecycle management and we definitely need to work towards making
|
||||
sure we get rid of Images API v1 and don't need to waste any of our
|
||||
precious time to keep that codebase still alive. If we can achieve
|
||||
these by early Rocky we would be in so much better place to move
|
||||
forward.
|
||||
|
||||
Looking the past Glance PTLs there is big boots to fill and I would
|
||||
do my best not to fail the expectations.
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for getting all the way down here and I hope we will work
|
||||
together next cycles to make Glance being the best Glance possible.
|
||||
|
||||
Erno jokke Kuvaja
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user