22a6223b1b
After all of the discussions we had on "https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670626/2", I studied all projects that have an "oslo_messaging" section. Afterwards, I applied the same method that is already used in "oslo_messaging" section in Nova, Cinder, and others. This guarantees that we have a consistent method to enable/disable notifications across projects based on components (e.g. Ceilometer) being enabled or disabled. Here follows the list of components, and the respective changes I did. * Aodh: The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will be removed in an upcomming PR. * Congress: The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will be removed in an upcomming PR. * Cinder: It was already properly configured. * Octavia: The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will be removed in an upcomming PR. * Heat: It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Ceilometer: Ceilometer publishes some messages in the rabbitMQ. However, the default driver is "messagingv2", and not ''(empty) as defined in Oslo; these configurations are defined in ceilometer/publisher/messaging.py. Therefore, we do not need to do anything for the "oslo_messaging_notifications" section in Ceilometer * Tacker: It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Neutron: It was already properly configured. * Nova It was already properly configured. However, we found another issue with its configuration. Kolla-ansible does not configure nova notifications as it should. If 'searchlight' is not installed (enabled) the 'notification_format' should be 'unversioned'. The default is 'both'; so nova will send a notification to the queue versioned_notifications; but that queue has no consumer when 'searchlight' is disabled. In our case, the queue got 511k messages. The huge amount of "stuck" messages made the Rabbitmq cluster unstable. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1478274 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1665449 * Nova_hyperv: I added the same configurations as in Nova project. * Vitrage It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Searchlight I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova, and others. * Ironic I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova, and others. * Glance It was already properly configured. * Trove It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Blazar It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Sahara It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Watcher I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova, and others. * Barbican I created a mechanism similar to what we have in Cinder, Nova, and others. I also added a configuration to 'keystone_notifications' section. Barbican needs its own queue to capture events from Keystone. Otherwise, it has an impact on Ceilometer and other systems that are connected to the "notifications" default queue. * Keystone Keystone is the system that triggered this work with the discussions that followed on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670626/2. After a long discussion, we agreed to apply the same approach that we have in Nova, Cinder and other systems in Keystone. That is what we did. Moreover, we introduce a new topic "barbican_notifications" when barbican is enabled. We also removed the "variable" enable_cadf_notifications, as it is obsolete, and the default in Keystone is CADF. * Mistral: It was hardcoded "noop" as the driver. However, that does not seem a good practice. Instead, I applied the same standard of using the driver and pushing to "notifications" queue if Ceilometer is enabled. * Cyborg: I created a mechanism similar to what we have in AODH, Cinder, Nova, and others. * Murano It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Senlin It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Manila It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Zun The section is declared, but it is not used. Therefore, it will be removed in an upcomming PR. * Designate It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components * Magnum It was already using a similar scheme; I just modified it a little bit to be the same as we have in all other components Closes-Bug: #1838985 Change-Id: I88bdb004814f37c81c9a9c4e5e491fac69f6f202 Signed-off-by: Rafael Weingärtner <rafael@apache.org> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
murano-api.json.j2 | ||
murano-engine.json.j2 | ||
murano.conf.j2 |