openstack/oslo.policy
Code Issues Proposed changes
e2ad8f6ce8
oslo.policy/oslo_policy/policy.py
Ghanshyam Mann e2ad8f6ce8 Fix doc comments for new enforce default flag 
This commit fixes the review comments from
patch - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/717943/

Change-Id: I00edbea503aefbce31cbb43a74929db752235bf0
2020-04-09 10:31:09 -05:00

1392 lines
54 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
#
# Copyright (c) 2012 OpenStack Foundation.
# All Rights Reserved.
#
# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may
# not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain
# a copy of the License at
#
# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
#
# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT
# WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the
# License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
"""
Common Policy Engine Implementation
Policies are expressed as a target and an associated rule::
"<target>": <rule>
The `target` is specific to the service that is conducting policy
enforcement. Typically, the target refers to an API call.
For the `<rule>` part, see `Policy Rule Expressions`.
Policy Rule Expressions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Policy rules can be expressed in one of two forms: a string written in the new
policy language or a list of lists. The string format is preferred since it's
easier for most people to understand.
In the policy language, each check is specified as a simple "a:b" pair that is
matched to the correct class to perform that check:
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| TYPE | SYNTAX |
+================================+==========================================+
|User's Role | role:admin |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
|Rules already defined on policy | rule:admin_required |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
|Against URLs¹ | http://my-url.org/check |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
|User attributes² | project_id:%(target.project.id)s |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
|Strings | - <variable>:'xpto2035abc' |
| | - 'myproject':<variable> |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
| | - project_id:xpto2035abc |
|Literals | - domain_id:20 |
| | - True:%(user.enabled)s |
+--------------------------------+------------------------------------------+
¹URL checking must return ``True`` to be valid
²User attributes (obtained through the token): user_id, domain_id or project_id
Conjunction operators ``and`` and ``or`` are available, allowing for more
expressiveness in crafting policies. For example::
"role:admin or (project_id:%(project_id)s and role:projectadmin)"
The policy language also has the ``not`` operator, allowing a richer
policy rule::
"project_id:%(project_id)s and not role:dunce"
Operator precedence is below:
+------------+-------------+-------------+
| PRECEDENCE | TYPE | EXPRESSION |
+============+=============+=============+
| 4 | Grouping | (...) |
+------------+-------------+-------------+
| 3 | Logical NOT | not ... |
+------------+-------------+-------------+
| 2 | Logical AND | ... and ... |
+------------+-------------+-------------+
| 1 | Logical OR | ... or ... |
+------------+-------------+-------------+
Operator with larger precedence number precedes others with smaller numbers.
In the list-of-lists representation, each check inside the innermost
list is combined as with an "and" conjunction -- for that check to pass,
all the specified checks must pass. These innermost lists are then
combined as with an "or" conjunction. As an example, take the following
rule, expressed in the list-of-lists representation::
[["role:admin"], ["project_id:%(project_id)s", "role:projectadmin"]]
Finally, two special policy checks should be mentioned; the policy
check "@" will always accept an access, and the policy check "!" will
always reject an access. (Note that if a rule is either the empty
list (``[]``) or the empty string (``""``), this is equivalent to the "@"
policy check.) Of these, the "!" policy check is probably the most useful,
as it allows particular rules to be explicitly disabled.
Generic Checks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A `generic` check is used to perform matching against attributes that are sent
along with the API calls. These attributes can be used by the policy engine
(on the right side of the expression), by using the following syntax::
<some_attribute>:%(user.id)s
The value on the right-hand side is either a string or resolves to a
string using regular Python string substitution. The available attributes
and values are dependent on the program that is using the common policy
engine.
All of these attributes (related to users, API calls, and context) can be
checked against each other or against constants. It is important to note
that these attributes are specific to the service that is conducting
policy enforcement.
Generic checks can be used to perform policy checks on the following user
attributes obtained through a token:
- user_id
- domain_id or project_id (depending on the token scope)
- list of roles held for the given token scope
.. note::
Some resources which are exposed by the API do not support policy
enforcement by user_id, and only support policy enforcement by project_id.
Some global resources do not support policy enforcement by combination of
user_id and project_id.
For example, a check on the user_id would be defined as::
user_id:<some_value>
Together with the previously shown example, a complete generic check
would be::
user_id:%(user.id)s
It is also possible to perform checks against other attributes that
represent the credentials. This is done by adding additional values to
the ``creds`` dict that is passed to the
:meth:`~oslo_policy.policy.Enforcer.enforce` method.
Special Checks
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Special checks allow for more flexibility than is possible using generic
checks. The built-in special check types are ``role``, ``rule``, and ``http``
checks.
Role Check
^^^^^^^^^^
A ``role`` check is used to check if a specific role is present in the supplied
credentials. A role check is expressed as::
"role:<role_name>"
Rule Check
^^^^^^^^^^
A :class:`rule check <oslo_policy.policy.RuleCheck>` is used to
reference another defined rule by its name. This allows for common
checks to be defined once as a reusable rule, which is then referenced
within other rules. It also allows one to define a set of checks as a
more descriptive name to aid in readability of policy. A rule check is
expressed as::
"rule:<rule_name>"
The following example shows a role check that is defined as a rule,
which is then used via a rule check::
"admin_required": "role:admin"
"<target>": "rule:admin_required"
HTTP Check
^^^^^^^^^^
An ``http`` check is used to make an HTTP request to a remote server to
determine the results of the check. The target and credentials are passed to
the remote server for evaluation. The action is authorized if the remote
server returns a response of ``True``. An http check is expressed as::
"http:<target URI>"
It is expected that the target URI contains a string formatting keyword,
where the keyword is a key from the target dictionary. An example of an
http check where the `name` key from the target is used to construct the
URL is would be defined as::
"http://server.test/%(name)s"
Registering New Special Checks
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
It is also possible for additional special check types to be registered
using the :func:`~oslo_policy.policy.register` function.
The following classes can be used as parents for custom special check types:
* :class:`~oslo_policy.policy.AndCheck`
* :class:`~oslo_policy.policy.NotCheck`
* :class:`~oslo_policy.policy.OrCheck`
* :class:`~oslo_policy.policy.RuleCheck`
Default Rule
~~~~~~~~~~~~
A default rule can be defined, which will be enforced when a rule does
not exist for the target that is being checked. By default, the rule
associated with the rule name of ``default`` will be used as the default
rule. It is possible to use a different rule name as the default rule
by setting the ``policy_default_rule`` configuration setting to the
desired rule name.
"""
import collections
import copy
import logging
import os
import warnings
from oslo_config import cfg
from oslo_context import context
from oslo_serialization import jsonutils
from oslo_utils import strutils
import six
import yaml
from oslo_policy import _cache_handler
from oslo_policy import _checks
from oslo_policy._i18n import _
from oslo_policy import _parser
from oslo_policy import opts
LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
register = _checks.register
"""Register a function or :class:`.Check` class as a policy check.
:param name: Gives the name of the check type, e.g., "rule",
"role", etc. If name is ``None``, a default check type
will be registered.
:param func: If given, provides the function or class to register.
If not given, returns a function taking one argument
to specify the function or class to register,
allowing use as a decorator.
"""
Check = _checks.Check
"""A base class to allow for user-defined policy checks.
:param kind: The kind of the check, i.e., the field before the ``:``.
:param match: The match of the check, i.e., the field after the ``:``.
"""
AndCheck = _checks.AndCheck
"""Implements the "and" logical operator.
A policy check that requires that a list of other checks all return True.
:param list rules: rules that will be tested.
"""
NotCheck = _checks.NotCheck
"""Implements the "not" logical operator.
A policy check that inverts the result of another policy check.
:param rule: The rule to negate.
"""
OrCheck = _checks.OrCheck
"""Implements the "or" operator.
A policy check that requires that at least one of a list of other
checks returns ``True``.
:param rules: A list of rules that will be tested.
"""
RuleCheck = _checks.RuleCheck
"""Recursively checks credentials based on the defined rules."""
class PolicyNotAuthorized(Exception):
"""Default exception raised for policy enforcement failure."""
def __init__(self, rule, target, creds):
msg = _("%(rule)s is disallowed by policy") % {'rule': rule}
super(PolicyNotAuthorized, self).__init__(msg)
class InvalidScope(Exception):
"""Raised when the scope of the request mismatches the policy scope."""
def __init__(self, rule, operation_scopes, token_scope):
msg = (
"%(rule)s requires a scope of %(operation_scopes)s, request "
"was made with %(token_scope)s scope." % {
'rule': rule,
'operation_scopes': operation_scopes,
'token_scope': token_scope
}
)
super(InvalidScope, self).__init__(msg)
class DuplicatePolicyError(Exception):
def __init__(self, name):
msg = _('Policy %(name)s is already registered') % {'name': name}
super(DuplicatePolicyError, self).__init__(msg)
class PolicyNotRegistered(Exception):
def __init__(self, name):
msg = _('Policy %(name)s has not been registered') % {'name': name}
super(PolicyNotRegistered, self).__init__(msg)
class InvalidDefinitionError(Exception):
def __init__(self, names):
msg = _('Policies %(names)s are not well defined. Check logs for '
'more details.') % {'names': names}
super(InvalidDefinitionError, self).__init__(msg)
class InvalidRuleDefault(Exception):
def __init__(self, error):
msg = (_('Invalid policy rule default: '
'%(error)s.') % {'error': error})
super(InvalidRuleDefault, self).__init__(msg)
class InvalidContextObject(Exception):
def __init__(self, error):
msg = (_('Invalid context object: '
'%(error)s.') % {'error': error})
super(InvalidContextObject, self).__init__(msg)
def parse_file_contents(data):
"""Parse the raw contents of a policy file.
Parses the contents of a policy file which currently can be in either
yaml or json format. Both can be parsed as yaml.
:param data: A string containing the contents of a policy file.
:returns: A dict of the form {'policy_name1': 'policy1',
'policy_name2': 'policy2,...}
"""
try:
# NOTE(snikitin): jsonutils.loads() is much faster than
# yaml.safe_load(). However jsonutils.loads() parses only JSON while
# yaml.safe_load() parses JSON and YAML. So here we try to parse data
# by jsonutils.loads() first. In case of failure yaml.safe_load()
# will be used instead.
parsed = jsonutils.loads(data)
except ValueError:
try:
parsed = yaml.safe_load(data)
except yaml.YAMLError as e:
# For backwards-compatibility, convert yaml error to ValueError,
# which is what JSON loader raised.
raise ValueError(six.text_type(e))
return parsed or {}
class Rules(dict):
"""A store for rules. Handles the default_rule setting directly."""
@classmethod
def load(cls, data, default_rule=None):
"""Allow loading of YAML/JSON rule data.
.. versionadded:: 1.5.0
"""
parsed_file = parse_file_contents(data)
# Parse the rules
rules = {k: _parser.parse_rule(v) for k, v in parsed_file.items()}
return cls(rules, default_rule)
@classmethod
def load_json(cls, data, default_rule=None):
"""Allow loading of YAML/JSON rule data.
.. warning::
This method is deprecated as of the 1.5.0 release in favor of
:meth:`load` and may be removed in the 2.0 release.
"""
warnings.warn(
'The load_json() method is deprecated as of the 1.5.0 release in '
'favor of load() and may be removed in the 2.0 release.',
DeprecationWarning)
return cls.load(data, default_rule)
@classmethod
def from_dict(cls, rules_dict, default_rule=None):
"""Allow loading of rule data from a dictionary."""
# Parse the rules stored in the dictionary
rules = {k: _parser.parse_rule(v) for k, v in rules_dict.items()}
return cls(rules, default_rule)
def __init__(self, rules=None, default_rule=None):
"""Initialize the Rules store."""
super(Rules, self).__init__(rules or {})
self.default_rule = default_rule
def __missing__(self, key):
"""Implements the default rule handling."""
if isinstance(self.default_rule, dict):
raise KeyError(key)
# If the default rule isn't actually defined, do something
# reasonably intelligent
if not self.default_rule:
raise KeyError(key)
if isinstance(self.default_rule, _checks.BaseCheck):
return self.default_rule
# We need to check this or we can get infinite recursion
if self.default_rule not in self:
raise KeyError(key)
elif isinstance(self.default_rule, six.string_types):
return self[self.default_rule]
def __str__(self):
"""Dumps a string representation of the rules."""
# Start by building the canonical strings for the rules
out_rules = {}
for key, value in self.items():
# Use empty string for singleton TrueCheck instances
if isinstance(value, _checks.TrueCheck):
out_rules[key] = ''
else:
out_rules[key] = str(value)
# Dump a pretty-printed JSON representation
return jsonutils.dumps(out_rules, indent=4)
class Enforcer(object):
"""Responsible for loading and enforcing rules.
:param conf: A configuration object.
:param policy_file: Custom policy file to use, if none is
specified, ``conf.oslo_policy.policy_file`` will be
used.
:param rules: Default dictionary / Rules to use. It will be
considered just in the first instantiation. If
:meth:`load_rules` with ``force_reload=True``,
:meth:`clear` or :meth:`set_rules` with ``overwrite=True``
is called this will be overwritten.
:param default_rule: Default rule to use, conf.default_rule will
be used if none is specified.
:param use_conf: Whether to load rules from cache or config file.
:param overwrite: Whether to overwrite existing rules when reload rules
from config file.
"""
def __init__(self, conf, policy_file=None, rules=None,
default_rule=None, use_conf=True, overwrite=True):
self.conf = conf
opts._register(conf)
self.default_rule = (default_rule or
self.conf.oslo_policy.policy_default_rule)
self.rules = Rules(rules, self.default_rule)
self.registered_rules = {}
self.file_rules = {}
self.policy_path = None
self.policy_file = policy_file or self.conf.oslo_policy.policy_file
self.use_conf = use_conf
self._need_check_rule = True
self.overwrite = overwrite
self._loaded_files = []
self._policy_dir_mtimes = {}
self._file_cache = {}
self._informed_no_policy_file = False
# FOR TESTING ONLY
self.suppress_deprecation_warnings = False
def set_rules(self, rules, overwrite=True, use_conf=False):
"""Create a new :class:`Rules` based on the provided dict of rules.
:param dict rules: New rules to use.
:param overwrite: Whether to overwrite current rules or update them
with the new rules.
:param use_conf: Whether to reload rules from cache or config file.
"""
if not isinstance(rules, dict):
raise TypeError(_('Rules must be an instance of dict or Rules, '
'got %s instead') % type(rules))
self.use_conf = use_conf
self._need_check_rule = True
if overwrite:
self.rules = Rules(rules, self.default_rule)
else:
self.rules.update(rules)
def clear(self):
"""Clears :class:`Enforcer` contents.
This will clear this instances rules, policy's cache, file cache
and policy's path.
"""
self.set_rules({})
self.default_rule = None
self.policy_path = None
self._loaded_files = []
self._policy_dir_mtimes = {}
self._file_cache.clear()
self.registered_rules = {}
self.file_rules = {}
self._informed_no_policy_file = False
self.suppress_deprecation_warnings = False
def load_rules(self, force_reload=False):
"""Loads policy_path's rules.
Policy file is cached and will be reloaded if modified.
:param force_reload: Whether to reload rules from config file.
"""
if force_reload:
self.use_conf = force_reload
if self.use_conf:
if not self.policy_path:
try:
self.policy_path = self._get_policy_path(self.policy_file)
except cfg.ConfigFilesNotFoundError:
if not self._informed_no_policy_file:
LOG.debug('The policy file %s could not be found.',
self.policy_file)
self._informed_no_policy_file = True
if self.policy_path:
self._load_policy_file(self.policy_path, force_reload,
overwrite=self.overwrite)
for path in self.conf.oslo_policy.policy_dirs:
try:
path = self._get_policy_path(path)
except cfg.ConfigFilesNotFoundError:
continue
if (force_reload or self._is_directory_updated(
self._policy_dir_mtimes, path)):
self._walk_through_policy_directory(path,
self._load_policy_file,
force_reload, False)
for default in self.registered_rules.values():
if default.deprecated_for_removal:
self._emit_deprecated_for_removal_warning(default)
elif default.deprecated_rule:
self._handle_deprecated_rule(default)
if default.name not in self.rules:
self.rules[default.name] = default.check
# Detect and log obvious incorrect rule definitions
if self._need_check_rule:
self.check_rules()
self._need_check_rule = False
def check_rules(self, raise_on_violation=False):
"""Look for rule definitions that are obviously incorrect."""
undefined_checks = []
cyclic_checks = []
violation = False
for name, check in self.rules.items():
if self._undefined_check(check):
undefined_checks.append(name)
violation = True
if self._cycle_check(check):
cyclic_checks.append(name)
violation = True
if undefined_checks:
LOG.warning('Policies %(names)s reference a rule that is not '
'defined.', {'names': undefined_checks})
if cyclic_checks:
LOG.warning('Policies %(names)s are part of a cyclical '
'reference.', {'names': cyclic_checks})
if raise_on_violation and violation:
raise InvalidDefinitionError(undefined_checks + cyclic_checks)
return not violation
def _emit_deprecated_for_removal_warning(self, default):
# If the policy is being removed completely, we need to let operators
# know that the policy is going to be silently ignored in the future
# and they can remove it from their overrides since it isn't being
# replaced by another policy.
if not self.suppress_deprecation_warnings and \
default.name in self.file_rules:
warnings.warn(
'Policy "%(policy)s":"%(check_str)s" was deprecated for '
'removal in %(release)s. Reason: %(reason)s. Its value may be '
'silently ignored in the future.' % {
'policy': default.name,
'check_str': default.check_str,
'release': default.deprecated_since,
'reason': default.deprecated_reason
}
)
def _handle_deprecated_rule(self, default):
"""Handle cases where a policy rule has been deprecated.
:param default: an instance of RuleDefault that contains an instance of
DeprecatedRule
"""
deprecated_rule = default.deprecated_rule
deprecated_msg = (
'Policy "%(old_name)s":"%(old_check_str)s" was deprecated in '
'%(release)s in favor of "%(name)s":"%(check_str)s". Reason: '
'%(reason)s. Either ensure your deployment is ready for the new '
'default or copy/paste the deprecated policy into your policy '
'file and maintain it manually.' % {
'old_name': deprecated_rule.name,
'old_check_str': deprecated_rule.check_str,
'release': default.deprecated_since,
'name': default.name,
'check_str': default.check_str,
'reason': default.deprecated_reason
}
)
# Print a warning because the actual policy name is changing. If
# operators are relying on an override for foo:bar and it's getting
# renamed to foo:create_bar then they need to be able to see that
# before they roll out the next release. If the policy name is in
# self.file_rules, we know that it's being overridden.
if deprecated_rule.name != default.name and (
deprecated_rule.name in self.file_rules):
if not self.suppress_deprecation_warnings:
warnings.warn(deprecated_msg)
# If the deprecated policy is being overridden and doesn't match
# the default deprecated policy, override the new policy's default
# with the old check string. This should prevents unwanted exposure
# to APIs on upgrade.
# There's one exception to this: When we generate a sample policy,
# we set the deprecated rule name to reference the new rule. If we
# see that the deprecated override rule is just the new rule, then
# we shouldn't mess with it.
if (self.file_rules[deprecated_rule.name].check
!= _parser.parse_rule(deprecated_rule.check_str) and
str(self.file_rules[deprecated_rule.name].check)
!= 'rule:%s' % default.name):
if default.name not in self.file_rules.keys():
self.rules[default.name] = self.file_rules[
deprecated_rule.name
].check
# In this case, the default check string is changing. We need to let
# operators know that this is going to change. If they don't want to
# override it, they are going to have to make sure the right
# infrastructure exists before they upgrade. This overrides the new
# check with an OrCheck that combines the new and old check_str
# attributes from the new and deprecated policies. This will make it so
# that deployments don't break on upgrade, but they receive log
# messages telling them stuff is going to change if they don't maintain
# the policy manually or add infrastructure to their deployment to
# support the new policy.
# If the enforce_new_defaults flag is True, do not add OrCheck to the
# old check_str and enforce only the new defaults.
if (not self.conf.oslo_policy.enforce_new_defaults
and deprecated_rule.check_str != default.check_str
and default.name not in self.file_rules):
default.check = OrCheck([_parser.parse_rule(cs) for cs in
[default.check_str,
deprecated_rule.check_str]])
if not self.suppress_deprecation_warnings:
warnings.warn(deprecated_msg)
def _undefined_check(self, check):
'''Check if a RuleCheck references an undefined rule.'''
if isinstance(check, RuleCheck):
if check.match not in self.rules:
# Undefined rule
return True
# An AndCheck or OrCheck is composed of multiple rules so check
# each of those.
rules = getattr(check, 'rules', None)
if rules:
for rule in rules:
if self._undefined_check(rule):
return True
return False
def _cycle_check(self, check, seen=None):
'''Check if RuleChecks cycle.
Looking for something like:
"foo": "rule:bar"
"bar": "rule:foo"
'''
if seen is None:
seen = set()
if isinstance(check, RuleCheck):
if check.match in seen:
# Cycle found
return True
seen.add(check.match)
if check.match in self.rules:
# There can only be a cycle if the referenced rule is defined.
if self._cycle_check(self.rules[check.match], seen):
return True
# An AndCheck or OrCheck is composed of multiple rules so check
# each of those.
rules = getattr(check, 'rules', None)
if rules:
for rule in rules:
# As there being an OrCheck or AndCheck, a copy of the father's
# seen should be called here. In order that the checks in
# different branchs are seperated.
if self._cycle_check(rule, seen.copy()):
return True
return False
@staticmethod
def _is_directory_updated(cache, path):
# Get the current modified time and compare it to what is in
# the cache and check if the new mtime is greater than what
# is in the cache
mtime = 0
if os.path.exists(path):
# Make a list of all the files
files = [path] + [os.path.join(path, file) for file in
os.listdir(path)]
# Pick the newest one, let's use its time.
mtime = os.path.getmtime(max(files, key=os.path.getmtime))
cache_info = cache.setdefault(path, {})
if mtime > cache_info.get('mtime', 0):
cache_info['mtime'] = mtime
return True
return False
@staticmethod
def _walk_through_policy_directory(path, func, *args):
if not os.path.isdir(path):
raise ValueError('%s is not a directory' % path)
# We do not iterate over sub-directories.
policy_files = next(os.walk(path))[2]
policy_files.sort()
for policy_file in [p for p in policy_files if not p.startswith('.')]:
func(os.path.join(path, policy_file), *args)
def _record_file_rules(self, data, overwrite=False):
"""Store a copy of rules loaded from a file.
It is useful to be able to distinguish between rules loaded from a file
and those registered by a consuming service. In order to do so we keep
a record of rules loaded from a file.
:param data: The raw contents of a policy file.
:param overwrite: If True clear out previously loaded rules.
"""
if overwrite:
self.file_rules = {}
parsed_file = parse_file_contents(data)
for name, check_str in parsed_file.items():
self.file_rules[name] = RuleDefault(name, check_str)
def _load_policy_file(self, path, force_reload, overwrite=True):
reloaded, data = _cache_handler.read_cached_file(
self._file_cache, path, force_reload=force_reload)
if reloaded or not self.rules:
rules = Rules.load(data, self.default_rule)
self.set_rules(rules, overwrite=overwrite, use_conf=True)
self._record_file_rules(data, overwrite)
self._loaded_files.append(path)
LOG.debug('Reloaded policy file: %(path)s', {'path': path})
def _get_policy_path(self, path):
"""Locate the policy YAML/JSON data file/path.
:param path: It's value can be a full path or related path. When
full path specified, this function just returns the full
path. When related path specified, this function will
search configuration directories to find one that exists.
:returns: The policy path
:raises: ConfigFilesNotFoundError if the file/path couldn't
be located.
"""
policy_path = self.conf.find_file(path)
if policy_path:
return policy_path
raise cfg.ConfigFilesNotFoundError((path,))
def enforce(self, rule, target, creds, do_raise=False, exc=None,
*args, **kwargs):
"""Checks authorization of a rule against the target and credentials.
:param rule: The rule to evaluate.
:type rule: string or :class:`BaseCheck`
:param dict target: As much information about the object being
operated on as possible. The target
argument should be a dict instance or an
instance of a class that fully supports
the Mapping abstract base class and deep
copying.
:param dict creds: As much information about the user performing the
action as possible. This parameter can also be an
instance of ``oslo_context.context.RequestContext``.
:param do_raise: Whether to raise an exception or not if check
fails.
:param exc: Class of the exception to raise if the check fails.
Any remaining arguments passed to :meth:`enforce` (both
positional and keyword arguments) will be passed to
the exception class. If not specified,
:class:`PolicyNotAuthorized` will be used.
:return: ``False`` if the policy does not allow the action and `exc` is
not provided; otherwise, returns a value that evaluates to
``True``. Note: for rules using the "case" expression, this
``True`` value will be the specified string from the
expression.
"""
self.load_rules()
if isinstance(creds, context.RequestContext):
creds = self._map_context_attributes_into_creds(creds)
# NOTE(lbragstad): The oslo.context library exposes the ability to call
# a method on RequestContext objects that converts attributes of the
# context object to policy values. However, ``to_policy_values()``
# doesn't actually return a dictionary, it's a subclass of
# collections.MutableMapping, which behaves like a dictionary but
# doesn't pass the type check.
elif not isinstance(creds, collections.MutableMapping):
msg = (
'Expected type oslo_context.context.RequestContext, dict, or '
'the output of '
'oslo_context.context.RequestContext.to_policy_values but '
'got %(creds_type)s instead' % {'creds_type': type(creds)}
)
raise InvalidContextObject(msg)
if LOG.isEnabledFor(logging.DEBUG):
try:
# NOTE(jdennis) Although a MutableMapping behaves like
# a dict oslo.strutils.mask_dict_password() requires a
# dict. Bug #1804528 was opened to fix this, once that
# bug is fixed the conversion to dict can be removed.
if isinstance(creds, dict):
creds_dict = creds
elif isinstance(creds, collections.MutableMapping):
creds_dict = dict(creds)
else:
raise TypeError('unexpected type %(creds_type)s' %
{'creds_type': type(creds)})
creds_dict = strutils.mask_dict_password(
copy.deepcopy(creds_dict)
)
creds_msg = jsonutils.dumps(creds_dict,
skipkeys=True, sort_keys=True)
except Exception as e:
creds_msg = ('cannot format data, exception: %(exp)s' %
{'exp': e})
try:
target_dict = strutils.mask_dict_password(
copy.deepcopy(target)
)
target_msg = jsonutils.dumps(target_dict,
skipkeys=True, sort_keys=True)
except Exception as e:
target_msg = ('cannot format data, exception: %(exp)s' %
{'exp': e})
LOG.debug('enforce: rule=%s creds=%s target=%s',
rule.__class__ if isinstance(rule, _checks.BaseCheck)
else '"%s"' % rule, creds_msg, target_msg)
# Allow the rule to be a Check tree
if isinstance(rule, _checks.BaseCheck):
# If the thing we're given is a Check, we don't know the
# name of the rule, so pass None for current_rule.
result = _checks._check(
rule=rule,
target=target,
creds=creds,
enforcer=self,
current_rule=None,
)
elif not self.rules:
# No rules to reference means we're going to fail closed
result = False
else:
try:
to_check = self.rules[rule]
except KeyError:
LOG.debug('Rule [%s] does not exist', rule)
# If the rule doesn't exist, fail closed
result = False
else:
# Check the scope of the operation against the possible scope
# attributes provided in `creds`.
if creds.get('system'):
token_scope = 'system'
elif creds.get('domain_id'):
token_scope = 'domain'
else:
# If the token isn't system-scoped or domain-scoped then
# we're dealing with a project-scoped token.
token_scope = 'project'
registered_rule = self.registered_rules.get(rule)
if registered_rule and registered_rule.scope_types:
if token_scope not in registered_rule.scope_types:
if self.conf.oslo_policy.enforce_scope:
raise InvalidScope(
rule, registered_rule.scope_types, token_scope
)
# If we don't raise an exception we should at least
# inform operators about policies that are being used
# with improper scopes.
msg = (
'Policy %(rule)s failed scope check. The token '
'used to make the request was %(token_scope)s '
'scoped but the policy requires %(policy_scope)s '
'scope. This behavior may change in the future '
'where using the intended scope is required' % {
'rule': rule,
'token_scope': token_scope,
'policy_scope': registered_rule.scope_types
}
)
warnings.warn(msg)
result = _checks._check(
rule=to_check,
target=target,
creds=creds,
enforcer=self,
current_rule=rule,
)
# If it is False, raise the exception if requested
if do_raise and not result:
if exc:
raise exc(*args, **kwargs)
raise PolicyNotAuthorized(rule, target, creds)
return result
def _map_context_attributes_into_creds(self, context):
creds = {}
# port public context attributes into the creds dictionary so long as
# the attribute isn't callable
context_values = context.to_policy_values()
for k, v in context_values.items():
creds[k] = v
# NOTE(lbragstad): We unfortunately have to special case this
# attribute. Originally when the system scope when into oslo.policy, we
# checked for a key called 'system' in creds. The oslo.context library
# uses `system_scope` instead, and the compatibility between
# oslo.policy and oslo.context was an afterthought. We'll have to
# support services who've been setting creds['system'], but we can do
# that by making sure we populate it with what's in the context object
# if it has a system_scope attribute.
if context.system_scope:
creds['system'] = context.system_scope
return creds
def register_default(self, default):
"""Registers a RuleDefault.
Adds a RuleDefault to the list of registered rules. Rules must be
registered before using the Enforcer.authorize method.
:param default: A RuleDefault object to register.
"""
if default.name in self.registered_rules:
raise DuplicatePolicyError(default.name)
self.registered_rules[default.name] = default
def register_defaults(self, defaults):
"""Registers a list of RuleDefaults.
Adds each RuleDefault to the list of registered rules. Rules must be
registered before using the Enforcer.authorize method.
:param default: A list of RuleDefault objects to register.
"""
for default in defaults:
self.register_default(default)
def authorize(self, rule, target, creds, do_raise=False,
exc=None, *args, **kwargs):
"""A wrapper around 'enforce' that checks for policy registration.
To ensure that a policy being checked has been registered this method
should be used rather than enforce. By doing so a project can be sure
that all of it's used policies are registered and therefore available
for sample file generation.
The parameters match the enforce method and a description of them can
be found there.
"""
if rule not in self.registered_rules:
raise PolicyNotRegistered(rule)
return self.enforce(rule, target, creds, do_raise, exc,
*args, **kwargs)
class RuleDefault(object):
"""A class for holding policy definitions.
It is required to supply a name and value at creation time. It is
encouraged to also supply a description to assist operators.
:param name: The name of the policy. This is used when referencing it
from another rule or during policy enforcement.
:param check_str: The policy. This is a string defining a policy that
conforms to the policy language outlined at the top of
the file.
:param description: A plain text description of the policy. This will be
used to comment sample policy files for use by
deployers.
:param deprecated_rule: :class:`.DeprecatedRule`
:param deprecated_for_removal: indicates whether the policy is planned for
removal in a future release.
:param deprecated_reason: indicates why this policy is planned for removal
in a future release. Silently ignored if
deprecated_for_removal is False.
:param deprecated_since: indicates which release this policy was deprecated
in. Accepts any string, though valid version
strings are encouraged. Silently ignored if
deprecated_for_removal is False.
:param scope_types: A list containing the intended scopes of the operation
being done.
.. versionchanged 1.29
Added *deprecated_rule* parameter.
.. versionchanged 1.29
Added *deprecated_for_removal* parameter.
.. versionchanged 1.29
Added *deprecated_reason* parameter.
.. versionchanged 1.29
Added *deprecated_since* parameter.
.. versionchanged 1.31
Added *scope_types* parameter.
"""
def __init__(self, name, check_str, description=None,
deprecated_rule=None, deprecated_for_removal=False,
deprecated_reason=None, deprecated_since=None,
scope_types=None):
self.name = name
self.check_str = check_str
self.check = _parser.parse_rule(check_str)
self.description = description
self.deprecated_rule = copy.deepcopy(deprecated_rule) or []
self.deprecated_for_removal = deprecated_for_removal
self.deprecated_reason = deprecated_reason
self.deprecated_since = deprecated_since
if self.deprecated_rule:
if not isinstance(self.deprecated_rule, DeprecatedRule):
raise ValueError(
'deprecated_rule must be a DeprecatedRule object.'
)
if (deprecated_for_removal or deprecated_rule) and (
deprecated_reason is None or deprecated_since is None):
raise ValueError(
'%(name)s deprecated without deprecated_reason or '
'deprecated_since. Both must be supplied if deprecating a '
'policy' % {'name': self.name}
)
if scope_types:
msg = 'scope_types must be a list of strings.'
if not isinstance(scope_types, list):
raise ValueError(msg)
for scope_type in scope_types:
if not isinstance(scope_type, six.string_types):
raise ValueError(msg)
if scope_types.count(scope_type) > 1:
raise ValueError(
'scope_types must be a list of unique strings.'
)
self.scope_types = scope_types
def __str__(self):
return '"%(name)s": "%(check_str)s"' % {'name': self.name,
'check_str': self.check_str}
def __eq__(self, other):
"""Equality operator.
All check objects have a stable string representation. It is used for
comparison rather than check_str because multiple check_str's may parse
to the same check object. For instance '' and '@' are equivalent and
the parsed rule string representation for both is '@'.
The description does not play a role in the meaning of the check so it
is not considered for equality.
"""
# Name should match, check should match, and class should be equivalent
# or one should be a subclass of the other.
if (self.name == other.name and
str(self.check) == str(other.check) and
(isinstance(self, other.__class__) or
isinstance(other, self.__class__))):
return True
return False
class DocumentedRuleDefault(RuleDefault):
"""A class for holding policy-in-code policy objects definitions
This class provides the same functionality as the RuleDefault class, but it
also requires additional data about the policy rule being registered. This
is necessary so that proper documentation can be rendered based on the
attributes of this class. Eventually, all usage of RuleDefault should be
converted to use DocumentedRuleDefault.
:param operations: List of dicts containing each api url and
corresponding http request method.
Example::
operations=[{'path': '/foo', 'method': 'GET'},
{'path': '/some', 'method': 'POST'}]
"""
def __init__(self, name, check_str, description, operations,
deprecated_rule=None, deprecated_for_removal=False,
deprecated_reason=None, deprecated_since=None,
scope_types=None):
super(DocumentedRuleDefault, self).__init__(
name, check_str, description,
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_for_removal=deprecated_for_removal,
deprecated_reason=deprecated_reason,
deprecated_since=deprecated_since,
scope_types=scope_types
)
self.operations = operations
@property
def description(self):
return self._description
@description.setter
def description(self, value):
# Validates description isn't empty.
if not value:
raise InvalidRuleDefault('Description is required')
self._description = value
@property
def operations(self):
return self._operations
@operations.setter
def operations(self, ops):
if not isinstance(ops, list):
raise InvalidRuleDefault('Operations must be a list')
if not ops:
raise InvalidRuleDefault('Operations list must not be empty')
for op in ops:
if 'path' not in op:
raise InvalidRuleDefault('Operation must contain a path')
if 'method' not in op:
raise InvalidRuleDefault('Operation must contain a method')
if len(op.keys()) > 2:
raise InvalidRuleDefault('Operation contains > 2 keys')
self._operations = ops
class DeprecatedRule(object):
"""Represents a Deprecated policy or rule.
Here's how you can use it to change a policy's default role or rule. Assume
the following policy exists in code::
from oslo_policy import policy
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:create_bar',
check_str='role:fizz',
description='Create a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars', 'method': 'POST'}]
)
The next snippet will maintain the deprecated option, but allow
``foo:create_bar`` to default to ``role:bang`` instead of ``role:fizz``::
deprecated_rule = policy.DeprecatedRule(
name='foo:create_bar',
check_str='role:fizz'
)
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:create_bar',
check_str='role:bang',
description='Create a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars', 'method': 'POST'}],
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_reason='role:bang is a better default',
deprecated_since='N'
)
DeprecatedRule can be used to change the policy name itself. Assume the
following policy exists in code::
from oslo_policy import policy
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:post_bar',
check_str='role:fizz',
description='Create a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars', 'method': 'POST'}]
)
For the sake of consistency, let's say we want to replace ``foo:post_bar``
with ``foo:create_bar``, but keep the same ``check_str`` as the default. We
can accomplish this by doing::
deprecated_rule = policy.DeprecatedRule(
name='foo:post_bar',
check_str='role:fizz'
)
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:create_bar',
check_str='role:fizz',
description='Create a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars', 'method': 'POST'}],
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_reason='foo:create_bar is more consistent',
deprecated_since='N'
)
Finally, let's use DeprecatedRule to break a policy into more granular
policies. Let's assume the following policy exists in code::
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:bar',
check_str='role:bazz',
description='Create, read, update, or delete a bar.',
operations=[
{
'path': '/v1/bars',
'method': 'POST'
},
{
'path': '/v1/bars',
'method': 'GET'
},
{
'path': '/v1/bars/{bar_id}',
'method': 'GET'
},
{
'path': '/v1/bars/{bar_id}',
'method': 'PATCH'
},
{
'path': '/v1/bars/{bar_id}',
'method': 'DELETE'
}
]
)
Here we can see the same policy is used to protect multiple operations on
bars. This prevents operators from being able to assign different roles to
different actions that can be taken on bar. For example, what if an
operator wanted to require a less restrictive role or rule to list bars but
a more restrictive rule to delete them? The following will introduce a
policy that helps achieve that and deprecate the original, overly-broad
policy::
deprecated_rule = policy.DeprecatedRule(
name='foo:bar',
check_str='role:bazz'
)
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:create_bar',
check_str='role:bang',
description='Create a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars', 'method': 'POST'}],
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_reason='foo:create_bar is more granular than foo:bar',
deprecated_since='N'
)
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:list_bars',
check_str='role:bazz',
description='List bars.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars', 'method': 'GET'}],
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_reason='foo:list_bars is more granular than foo:bar',
deprecated_since='N'
)
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:get_bar',
check_str='role:bazz',
description='Get a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars/{bar_id}', 'method': 'GET'}],
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_reason='foo:get_bar is more granular than foo:bar',
deprecated_since='N'
)
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:update_bar',
check_str='role:bang',
description='Update a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars/{bar_id}', 'method': 'PATCH'}],
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_reason='foo:update_bar is more granular than foo:bar',
deprecated_since='N'
)
policy.DocumentedRuleDefault(
name='foo:delete_bar',
check_str='role:bang',
description='Delete a bar.',
operations=[{'path': '/v1/bars/{bar_id}', 'method': 'DELETE'}],
deprecated_rule=deprecated_rule,
deprecated_reason='foo:delete_bar is more granular than foo:bar',
deprecated_since='N'
)
.. versionchanged 1.29
Added *DeprecatedRule* object.
"""
def __init__(self, name, check_str):
"""Construct a DeprecatedRule object.
:param name: the policy name
:param check_str: the value of the policy's check string
"""
self.name = name
self.check_str = check_str
View Git Blame Copy Permalink