Make mask_dict_password case insensitive and add new patterns
In Icc19b7c8bdb6a3182939d5e9fdef21288b19f43d mask_password was made case insensitive but mask_dict_password wasn't. This update makes the behaviour of these functions the same. Instead of lowering _SANITIZE_KEYS each time the source list is lowered. New password patterns from realworld logs were added to the patterns. Change-Id: Ic3ee301857630a15b9c26fd5d0fc907c43199517 Related-Bug: #1850843
This commit is contained in:
parent
704fdfdf79
commit
ed70bd3cd1
@ -54,12 +54,19 @@ SLUGIFY_STRIP_RE = re.compile(r"[^\w\s-]")
|
||||
SLUGIFY_HYPHENATE_RE = re.compile(r"[-\s]+")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# NOTE(flaper87): The following globals are used by `mask_password`
|
||||
_SANITIZE_KEYS = ['adminPass', 'admin_pass', 'password', 'admin_password',
|
||||
# NOTE(flaper87): The following globals are used by `mask_password` and
|
||||
# `mask_dict_password`
|
||||
_SANITIZE_KEYS = ['adminpass', 'admin_pass', 'password', 'admin_password',
|
||||
'auth_token', 'new_pass', 'auth_password', 'secret_uuid',
|
||||
'secret', 'sys_pswd', 'token', 'configdrive',
|
||||
'CHAPPASSWORD', 'encrypted_key', 'private_key',
|
||||
'encryption_key_id', 'fernetkey', 'sslkey', 'passphrase']
|
||||
'chappassword', 'encrypted_key', 'private_key',
|
||||
'encryption_key_id', 'fernetkey', 'sslkey', 'passphrase',
|
||||
'cephclusterfsid', 'octaviaheartbeatkey', 'rabbitcookie',
|
||||
'cephmanilaclientkey', 'pacemakerremoteauthkey',
|
||||
'designaterndckey', 'cephadminkey', 'heatauthencryptionkey',
|
||||
'cephclientkey', 'keystonecredential',
|
||||
'barbicansimplecryptokek', 'cephrgwkey', 'swifthashsuffix',
|
||||
'migrationsshkey', 'cephmdskey', 'cephmonkey']
|
||||
|
||||
# NOTE(ldbragst): Let's build a list of regex objects using the list of
|
||||
# _SANITIZE_KEYS we already have. This way, we only have to add the new key
|
||||
@ -406,7 +413,7 @@ def mask_dict_password(dictionary, secret="***"): # nosec
|
||||
k_matched = False
|
||||
if isinstance(k, six.string_types):
|
||||
for sani_key in _SANITIZE_KEYS:
|
||||
if sani_key in k:
|
||||
if sani_key.lower() in k.lower():
|
||||
out[k] = secret
|
||||
k_matched = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
@ -717,6 +717,16 @@ class MaskDictionaryPasswordTestCase(test_base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected,
|
||||
strutils.mask_dict_password(payload))
|
||||
|
||||
payload = {'passwords': {'KeystoneFernetKey1': 'c5FijjS'}}
|
||||
expected = {'passwords': {'KeystoneFernetKey1': '***'}}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected,
|
||||
strutils.mask_dict_password(payload))
|
||||
|
||||
payload = {'passwords': {'keystonecredential0': 'c5FijjS'}}
|
||||
expected = {'passwords': {'keystonecredential0': '***'}}
|
||||
self.assertEqual(expected,
|
||||
strutils.mask_dict_password(payload))
|
||||
|
||||
def test_do_no_harm(self):
|
||||
payload = {}
|
||||
expected = {}
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
security:
|
||||
- |
|
||||
This patch ensures that we mask sensitive data when masking dicts, even if
|
||||
the case doesn't match. This means the behaviour of mask_password and
|
||||
mask_dict_password is now the same.
|
||||
- |
|
||||
Additional password names were included from real world logs that contained
|
||||
sensitive information.
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user