From 252c0a035daa354872affe77902ace96f3903694 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "James E. Blair" Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 08:06:36 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Reference TC doc on licensing Our licensing stance is slightly more nuanced than was described here. Reference the external TC statement on licensing requirements rather than trying to re-describe it here. Change-Id: I5ffb95c153967decb89890f5132a2819ad569308 --- README.rst | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.rst b/README.rst index eb9282e8a4..9aee6ab9be 100644 --- a/README.rst +++ b/README.rst @@ -275,8 +275,7 @@ For new Requirements - Is the library license compatible? - Preferably Apache2, BSD, MIT licensed. LGPL is ok. GPL or AGPL is - verboten. Any other oddball license should be rejected. + The library should be licensed as described in `Licensing requirements`_. - Is the library already packaged in the distros we target (Ubuntu latest / Fedora latest)? @@ -297,6 +296,8 @@ For new Requirements transition plan to drop the old library in a reasonable amount of time. +.. _Licensing requirements: http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html + For Upgrading Requirements Versions -----------------------------------