Merge "Convert CONTRIBUTING.md to CONTRIBUTING.rst"
This commit is contained in:
Jenkins
Gerrit Code Review
commit
572be24cae
@ -1,98 +0,0 @@
|
||||
If you would like to contribute to the development of OpenStack,
|
||||
you must follow the steps in this page: [http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html](http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html)
|
||||
|
||||
Once those steps have been completed, changes to OpenStack
|
||||
should be submitted for review via the Gerrit tool, following
|
||||
the workflow documented at [http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#development-workflow](http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#development-workflow).
|
||||
|
||||
Gerrit is the review system used in the OpenStack projects. We're sorry, but
|
||||
we won't be able to respond to pull requests submitted through GitHub.
|
||||
|
||||
Bugs should be filed [on Launchpad](https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift),
|
||||
not in GitHub's issue tracker.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Swift Design Principles
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
* [The Zen of Python](http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/)
|
||||
* Simple Scales
|
||||
* Minimal dependencies
|
||||
* Re-use existing tools and libraries when reasonable
|
||||
* Leverage the economies of scale
|
||||
* Small, loosely coupled RESTful services
|
||||
* No single points of failure
|
||||
* Start with the use case
|
||||
* ... then design from the cluster operator up
|
||||
* If you haven't argued about it, you don't have the right answer yet :)
|
||||
* If it is your first implementation, you probably aren't done yet :)
|
||||
|
||||
Please don't feel offended by difference of opinion. Be prepared to advocate
|
||||
for your change and iterate on it based on feedback. Reach out to other people
|
||||
working on the project on
|
||||
[IRC](http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/) or the
|
||||
[mailing list](http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/) - we want
|
||||
to help.
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended workflow
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
* Set up a [Swift All-In-One VM](http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/development_saio.html)(SAIO).
|
||||
|
||||
* Make your changes. Docs and tests for your patch must land before
|
||||
or with your patch.
|
||||
|
||||
* Run unit tests, functional tests, probe tests
|
||||
``./.unittests``
|
||||
``./.functests``
|
||||
``./.probetests``
|
||||
|
||||
* Run ``tox`` (no command-line args needed)
|
||||
|
||||
* ``git review``
|
||||
|
||||
Notes on Testing
|
||||
================
|
||||
|
||||
Running the tests above against Swift in your development environment (ie
|
||||
your SAIO) will catch most issues. Any patch you propose is expected to be
|
||||
both tested and documented and all tests should pass.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to run just a subset of the tests while you are developing, you
|
||||
can use nosetests::
|
||||
|
||||
cd test/unit/common/middleware/ && nosetests test_healthcheck.py
|
||||
|
||||
To check which parts of your code are being exercised by a test, you can run
|
||||
tox and then point your browser to swift/cover/index.html::
|
||||
|
||||
tox -e py27 -- test.unit.common.middleware.test_healthcheck:TestHealthCheck.test_healthcheck
|
||||
|
||||
Swift's unit tests are designed to test small parts of the code in isolation.
|
||||
The functional tests validate that the entire system is working from an
|
||||
external perspective (they are "black-box" tests). You can even run functional
|
||||
tests against public Swift endpoints. The probetests are designed to test much
|
||||
of Swift's internal processes. For example, a test may write data,
|
||||
intentionally corrupt it, and then ensure that the correct processes detect
|
||||
and repair it.
|
||||
|
||||
When your patch is submitted for code review, it will automatically be tested
|
||||
on the OpenStack CI infrastructure. In addition to many of the tests above, it
|
||||
will also be tested by several other OpenStack test jobs.
|
||||
|
||||
Once your patch has been reviewed and approved by two core reviewers and has
|
||||
passed all automated tests, it will be merged into the Swift source tree.
|
||||
|
||||
Specs
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
The [``swift-specs``](https://github.com/openstack/swift-specs) repo
|
||||
can be used for collaborative design work before a feature is implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
OpenStack's gerrit system is used to collaborate on the design spec. Once
|
||||
approved OpenStack provides a doc site to easily read these [specs](http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/swift-specs/)
|
||||
|
||||
A spec is needed for more impactful features. Coordinating a feature between
|
||||
many devs (especially across companies) is a great example of when a spec is
|
||||
needed. If you are unsure if a spec document is needed, please feel free to
|
||||
ask in #openstack-swift on freenode IRC.
|
||||
113
CONTRIBUTING.rst
Normal file
113
CONTRIBUTING.rst
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
|
||||
If you would like to contribute to the development of OpenStack, you
|
||||
must follow the steps in this page:
|
||||
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html
|
||||
|
||||
Once those steps have been completed, changes to OpenStack should be
|
||||
submitted for review via the Gerrit tool, following the workflow
|
||||
documented at
|
||||
http://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/developers.html#development-workflow.
|
||||
|
||||
Gerrit is the review system used in the OpenStack projects. We're sorry,
|
||||
but we won't be able to respond to pull requests submitted through
|
||||
GitHub.
|
||||
|
||||
Bugs should be filed `on
|
||||
Launchpad <https://bugs.launchpad.net/swift>`__, not in GitHub's issue
|
||||
tracker.
|
||||
|
||||
Swift Design Principles
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
- `The Zen of Python <http://legacy.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0020/>`__
|
||||
- Simple Scales
|
||||
- Minimal dependencies
|
||||
- Re-use existing tools and libraries when reasonable
|
||||
- Leverage the economies of scale
|
||||
- Small, loosely coupled RESTful services
|
||||
- No single points of failure
|
||||
- Start with the use case
|
||||
- ... then design from the cluster operator up
|
||||
- If you haven't argued about it, you don't have the right answer yet
|
||||
:)
|
||||
- If it is your first implementation, you probably aren't done yet :)
|
||||
|
||||
Please don't feel offended by difference of opinion. Be prepared to
|
||||
advocate for your change and iterate on it based on feedback. Reach out
|
||||
to other people working on the project on
|
||||
`IRC <http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-swift/>`__ or
|
||||
the `mailing
|
||||
list <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/>`__ - we want
|
||||
to help.
|
||||
|
||||
Recommended workflow
|
||||
====================
|
||||
|
||||
- Set up a `Swift All-In-One
|
||||
VM <http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/development_saio.html>`__\ (SAIO).
|
||||
|
||||
- Make your changes. Docs and tests for your patch must land before or
|
||||
with your patch.
|
||||
|
||||
- Run unit tests, functional tests, probe tests ``./.unittests``
|
||||
``./.functests`` ``./.probetests``
|
||||
|
||||
- Run ``tox`` (no command-line args needed)
|
||||
|
||||
- ``git review``
|
||||
|
||||
Notes on Testing
|
||||
================
|
||||
|
||||
Running the tests above against Swift in your development environment
|
||||
(ie your SAIO) will catch most issues. Any patch you propose is expected
|
||||
to be both tested and documented and all tests should pass.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to run just a subset of the tests while you are developing,
|
||||
you can use nosetests:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: console
|
||||
|
||||
cd test/unit/common/middleware/ && nosetests test_healthcheck.py
|
||||
|
||||
To check which parts of your code are being exercised by a test, you can
|
||||
run tox and then point your browser to swift/cover/index.html:
|
||||
|
||||
.. code-block:: console
|
||||
|
||||
tox -e py27 -- test.unit.common.middleware.test_healthcheck:TestHealthCheck.test_healthcheck
|
||||
|
||||
Swift's unit tests are designed to test small parts of the code in
|
||||
isolation. The functional tests validate that the entire system is
|
||||
working from an external perspective (they are "black-box" tests). You
|
||||
can even run functional tests against public Swift endpoints. The
|
||||
probetests are designed to test much of Swift's internal processes. For
|
||||
example, a test may write data, intentionally corrupt it, and then
|
||||
ensure that the correct processes detect and repair it.
|
||||
|
||||
When your patch is submitted for code review, it will automatically be
|
||||
tested on the OpenStack CI infrastructure. In addition to many of the
|
||||
tests above, it will also be tested by several other OpenStack test
|
||||
jobs.
|
||||
|
||||
Once your patch has been reviewed and approved by two core reviewers and
|
||||
has passed all automated tests, it will be merged into the Swift source
|
||||
tree.
|
||||
|
||||
Specs
|
||||
=====
|
||||
|
||||
.. |swift-specs| replace:: ``swift-specs``
|
||||
.. _swift-specs: https://github.com/openstack/swift-specs
|
||||
|
||||
The |swift-specs|_ repo
|
||||
can be used for collaborative design work before a feature is
|
||||
implemented.
|
||||
|
||||
OpenStack's gerrit system is used to collaborate on the design spec.
|
||||
Once approved OpenStack provides a doc site to easily read these
|
||||
`specs <http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/swift-specs/>`__
|
||||
|
||||
A spec is needed for more impactful features. Coordinating a feature
|
||||
between many devs (especially across companies) is a great example of
|
||||
when a spec is needed. If you are unsure if a spec document is needed,
|
||||
please feel free to ask in #openstack-swift on freenode IRC.
|
||||
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
include AUTHORS LICENSE .functests .unittests .probetests test/__init__.py
|
||||
include CHANGELOG CONTRIBUTING.md README.md
|
||||
include CHANGELOG CONTRIBUTING.rst README.md
|
||||
include babel.cfg
|
||||
include test/sample.conf
|
||||
include tox.ini
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user