From 806fcbaf3ea061c002ef225ecdf4362b4655b67f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antoine Cabot Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 12:18:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Remove project priority section In specification template, we do not need any more the project priority section as it is set on launchpad. I also replaced a dead link related to when we need a spec or not Change-Id: I2c2e2aedd9d638d80f818cd9312f4031d84eecca --- specs/ocata-template.rst | 7 +------ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/specs/ocata-template.rst b/specs/ocata-template.rst index d4bcbb0..0b44ce7 100644 --- a/specs/ocata-template.rst +++ b/specs/ocata-template.rst @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ respectively. Some notes about the watcher-spec and blueprint process: * Not all blueprints need a spec. For more information see - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/watcher/devref/mitaka.blueprints.html#when-is-a-blueprint-needed + http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/blueprints.html#specs * The aim of this document is first to define the problem we need to solve, and second agree the overall approach to solve that problem. @@ -90,11 +90,6 @@ What use cases does this address? What impact on actors does this change have? Ensure you are clear about the actors in each use case: Developer, End User, Deployer etc. -Project Priority ------------------ - -Does this blueprint fit under one of the :ref:`mitaka-priorities`? If so which -one and how? Proposed change ===============