From e4236e0bf6cd75238dbf2cb873f1376a1545429b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: liusheng Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 11:45:09 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Use a soft link for template.rst As we use same templates of specs for different versions, it don't need to copy the template doc, just use a soft link. Change-Id: Ie07b0ec9c15275bfeefd4d289ca1209a1bbc3226 --- specs/ocata/approved/template.rst | 385 +----------------------------- specs/pike/approved/template.rst | 385 +----------------------------- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 768 deletions(-) mode change 100644 => 120000 specs/ocata/approved/template.rst mode change 100644 => 120000 specs/pike/approved/template.rst diff --git a/specs/ocata/approved/template.rst b/specs/ocata/approved/template.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 0ed6815..0000000 --- a/specs/ocata/approved/template.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,384 +0,0 @@ -.. - This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported - License. - - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode - -========================================== -Example Spec - The title of your blueprint -========================================== - -Include the URL of your launchpad blueprint: - -https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/example - -Introduction paragraph -- why are we doing anything? A single paragraph of -prose that operators can understand. The title and this first paragraph -should be used as the subject line and body of the commit message -respectively. - -Some notes about the mogan-spec and blueprint process: - -* Not all blueprints need a spec. For more information see - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/mogan/blueprints.html#specs - -* The aim of this document is first to define the problem we need to solve, - and second agree the overall approach to solve that problem. - -* This is not intended to be extensive documentation for a new feature. - For example, there is no need to specify the exact configuration changes, - nor the exact details of any DB model changes. But you should still define - that such changes are required, and be clear on how that will affect - upgrades. - -* You should aim to get your spec approved before writing your code. - While you are free to write prototypes and code before getting your spec - approved, its possible that the outcome of the spec review process leads - you towards a fundamentally different solution than you first envisaged. - -* But, API changes are held to a much higher level of scrutiny. - As soon as an API change merges, we must assume it could be in production - somewhere, and as such, we then need to support that API change forever. - To avoid getting that wrong, we do want lots of details about API changes - upfront. - -Some notes about using this template: - -* Your spec should be in ReSTructured text, like this template. - -* Please wrap text at 79 columns. - -* The filename in the git repository should match the launchpad URL, for - example a URL of: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/awesome-thing - should be named awesome-thing.rst - -* Please do not delete any of the sections in this template. If you have - nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None - -* For help with syntax, see http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html - -* To test out your formatting, build the docs using tox and see the generated - HTML file in doc/build/html/specs/ - -* If you would like to provide a diagram with your spec, ascii diagrams are - required. http://asciiflow.com/ is a very nice tool to assist with making - ascii diagrams. The reason for this is that the tool used to review specs is - based purely on plain text. Plain text will allow review to proceed without - having to look at additional files which can not be viewed in gerrit. It - will also allow inline feedback on the diagram itself. - -* If your specification proposes any changes to the Mogan REST API such - as changing parameters which can be returned or accepted, or even - the semantics of what happens when a client calls into the API, then - you should add the APIImpact flag to the commit message. Specifications with - the APIImpact flag can be found with the following query: - - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/mogan-specs+message:apiimpact,n,z - - -Problem description -=================== - -A detailed description of the problem. What problem is this blueprint -addressing? - -Use Cases ---------- - -What use cases does this address? What impact on actors does this change have? -Ensure you are clear about the actors in each use case: Developer, End User, -Deployer etc. - -Proposed change -=============== - -Here is where you cover the change you propose to make in detail. How do you -propose to solve this problem? - -If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In -other words, what's the scope of this effort? - -At this point, if you would like to just get feedback on if the problem and -proposed change fit in mogan, you can stop here and post this for review to get -preliminary feedback. If so please say: -Posting to get preliminary feedback on the scope of this spec. - -Alternatives ------------- - -What other ways could we do this thing? Why aren't we using those? This doesn't -have to be a full literature review, but it should demonstrate that thought has -been put into why the proposed solution is an appropriate one. - -Data model impact ------------------ - -Changes which require modifications to the data model often have a wider impact -on the system. The community often has strong opinions on how the data model -should be evolved, from both a functional and performance perspective. It is -therefore important to capture and gain agreement as early as possible on any -proposed changes to the data model. - -Questions which need to be addressed by this section include: - -* What new data objects and/or database schema changes is this going to - require? - -* What database migrations will accompany this change. - -* How will the initial set of new data objects be generated, for example if you - need to take into account existing instances, or modify other existing data - describe how that will work. - -REST API impact ---------------- - -Each API method which is either added or changed should have the following - -* Specification for the method - - * A description of what the method does suitable for use in - user documentation - - * Method type (POST/PUT/GET/DELETE) - - * Normal http response code(s) - - * Expected error http response code(s) - - * A description for each possible error code should be included - describing semantic errors which can cause it such as - inconsistent parameters supplied to the method, or when an - instance is not in an appropriate state for the request to - succeed. Errors caused by syntactic problems covered by the JSON - schema definition do not need to be included. - - * URL for the resource - - * URL should not include underscores, and use hyphens instead. - - * Parameters which can be passed via the url - - * JSON schema definition for the request body data if allowed - - * Field names should use snake_case style, not CamelCase or MixedCase - style. - - * JSON schema definition for the response body data if any - - * Field names should use snake_case style, not CamelCase or MixedCase - style. - -* Example use case including typical API samples for both data supplied - by the caller and the response - -* Discuss any policy changes, and discuss what things a deployer needs to - think about when defining their policy. - -Note that the schema should be defined as restrictively as -possible. Parameters which are required should be marked as such and -only under exceptional circumstances should additional parameters -which are not defined in the schema be permitted (eg -additionaProperties should be False). - -Reuse of existing predefined parameter types such as regexps for -passwords and user defined names is highly encouraged. - -Security impact ---------------- - -Describe any potential security impact on the system. Some of the items to -consider include: - -* Does this change touch sensitive data such as tokens, keys, or user data? - -* Does this change alter the API in a way that may impact security, such as - a new way to access sensitive information or a new way to login? - -* Does this change involve cryptography or hashing? - -* Does this change require the use of sudo or any elevated privileges? - -* Does this change involve using or parsing user-provided data? This could - be directly at the API level or indirectly such as changes to a cache layer. - -* Can this change enable a resource exhaustion attack, such as allowing a - single API interaction to consume significant server resources? Some examples - of this include launching subprocesses for each connection, or entity - expansion attacks in XML. - -For more detailed guidance, please see the OpenStack Security Guidelines as -a reference (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Guidelines). These -guidelines are a work in progress and are designed to help you identify -security best practices. For further information, feel free to reach out -to the OpenStack Security Group at openstack-security@lists.openstack.org. - -Notifications impact --------------------- - -Please specify any changes to notifications. Be that an extra notification, -changes to an existing notification, or removing a notification. - -Other end user impact ---------------------- - -Aside from the API, are there other ways a user will interact with this -feature? - -* Does this change have an impact on python-moganclient? What does the user - interface there look like? - -Performance Impact ------------------- - -Describe any potential performance impact on the system, for example -how often will new code be called, and is there a major change to the calling -pattern of existing code. - -Examples of things to consider here include: - -* A periodic task might look like a small addition but if it calls conductor or - another service the load is multiplied by the number of nodes in the system. - -* Scheduler filters get called once per host for every instance being created, - so any latency they introduce is linear with the size of the system. - -* A small change in a utility function or a commonly used decorator can have a - large impacts on performance. - -* Calls which result in a database queries (whether direct or via conductor) - can have a profound impact on performance when called in critical sections of - the code. - -* Will the change include any locking, and if so what considerations are there - on holding the lock? - -Other deployer impact ---------------------- - -Discuss things that will affect how you deploy and configure OpenStack -that have not already been mentioned, such as: - -* What config options are being added? Should they be more generic than - proposed (for example a flag that other hypervisor drivers might want to - implement as well)? Are the default values ones which will work well in - real deployments? - -* Is this a change that takes immediate effect after its merged, or is it - something that has to be explicitly enabled? - -* If this change is a new binary, how would it be deployed? - -* Please state anything that those doing continuous deployment, or those - upgrading from the previous release, need to be aware of. Also describe - any plans to deprecate configuration values or features. For example, if we - change the directory name that instances are stored in, how do we handle - instance directories created before the change landed? Do we move them? Do - we have a special case in the code? Do we assume that the operator will - recreate all the instances in their cloud? - -Developer impact ----------------- - -Discuss things that will affect other developers working on OpenStack, -such as: - -* If the blueprint proposes a change to the driver API, discussion of how - other hypervisors would implement the feature is required. - - -Implementation -============== - -Assignee(s) ------------ - -Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're -throwing it out there to see who picks it up? - -If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the -primary author and contact. - -Primary assignee: - - -Other contributors: - - -Work Items ----------- - -Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be -done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people, -but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation. - - -Dependencies -============ - -* Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in mogan, or in other - projects, that this one either depends on or is related to. - -* If this requires functionality of another project that is not currently used - by Mogan, document that fact. - -* Does this feature require any new library dependencies or code otherwise not - included in OpenStack? Or does it depend on a specific version of library? - - -Testing -======= - -Please discuss the important scenarios needed to test here, as well as -specific edge cases we should be ensuring work correctly. For each -scenario please specify if this requires specialized hardware, a full -openstack environment, or can be simulated inside the Mogan tree. - -Please discuss how the change will be tested. We especially want to know what -tempest tests will be added. It is assumed that unit test coverage will be -added so that doesn't need to be mentioned explicitly, but discussion of why -you think unit tests are sufficient and we don't need to add more tempest -tests would need to be included. - -Is this untestable in gate given current limitations (specific hardware / -software configurations available)? If so, are there mitigation plans (3rd -party testing, gate enhancements, etc). - - -Documentation Impact -==================== - -Which audiences are affected most by this change, and which documentation -titles on docs.openstack.org should be updated because of this change? Don't -repeat details discussed above, but reference them here in the context of -documentation for multiple audiences. For example, the Operations Guide targets -cloud operators, and the End User Guide would need to be updated if the change -offers a new feature available through the CLI or dashboard. If a config option -changes or is deprecated, note here that the documentation needs to be updated -to reflect this specification's change. - -References -========== - -Please add any useful references here. You are not required to have any -reference. Moreover, this specification should still make sense when your -references are unavailable. Examples of what you could include are: - -* Links to mailing list or IRC discussions - -* Links to notes from a summit session - -* Links to relevant research, if appropriate - -* Related specifications as appropriate (e.g. if it's an EC2 thing, link the - EC2 docs) - -* Anything else you feel it is worthwhile to refer to - -.. list-table:: Revisions - :header-rows: 1 - - * - Release Name - - Description - * - Ocata - - Introduced diff --git a/specs/ocata/approved/template.rst b/specs/ocata/approved/template.rst new file mode 120000 index 0000000..cf443d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/specs/ocata/approved/template.rst @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +../../template.rst \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/specs/pike/approved/template.rst b/specs/pike/approved/template.rst deleted file mode 100644 index 0ed6815..0000000 --- a/specs/pike/approved/template.rst +++ /dev/null @@ -1,384 +0,0 @@ -.. - This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported - License. - - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode - -========================================== -Example Spec - The title of your blueprint -========================================== - -Include the URL of your launchpad blueprint: - -https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/example - -Introduction paragraph -- why are we doing anything? A single paragraph of -prose that operators can understand. The title and this first paragraph -should be used as the subject line and body of the commit message -respectively. - -Some notes about the mogan-spec and blueprint process: - -* Not all blueprints need a spec. For more information see - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/mogan/blueprints.html#specs - -* The aim of this document is first to define the problem we need to solve, - and second agree the overall approach to solve that problem. - -* This is not intended to be extensive documentation for a new feature. - For example, there is no need to specify the exact configuration changes, - nor the exact details of any DB model changes. But you should still define - that such changes are required, and be clear on how that will affect - upgrades. - -* You should aim to get your spec approved before writing your code. - While you are free to write prototypes and code before getting your spec - approved, its possible that the outcome of the spec review process leads - you towards a fundamentally different solution than you first envisaged. - -* But, API changes are held to a much higher level of scrutiny. - As soon as an API change merges, we must assume it could be in production - somewhere, and as such, we then need to support that API change forever. - To avoid getting that wrong, we do want lots of details about API changes - upfront. - -Some notes about using this template: - -* Your spec should be in ReSTructured text, like this template. - -* Please wrap text at 79 columns. - -* The filename in the git repository should match the launchpad URL, for - example a URL of: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/awesome-thing - should be named awesome-thing.rst - -* Please do not delete any of the sections in this template. If you have - nothing to say for a whole section, just write: None - -* For help with syntax, see http://sphinx-doc.org/rest.html - -* To test out your formatting, build the docs using tox and see the generated - HTML file in doc/build/html/specs/ - -* If you would like to provide a diagram with your spec, ascii diagrams are - required. http://asciiflow.com/ is a very nice tool to assist with making - ascii diagrams. The reason for this is that the tool used to review specs is - based purely on plain text. Plain text will allow review to proceed without - having to look at additional files which can not be viewed in gerrit. It - will also allow inline feedback on the diagram itself. - -* If your specification proposes any changes to the Mogan REST API such - as changing parameters which can be returned or accepted, or even - the semantics of what happens when a client calls into the API, then - you should add the APIImpact flag to the commit message. Specifications with - the APIImpact flag can be found with the following query: - - https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/mogan-specs+message:apiimpact,n,z - - -Problem description -=================== - -A detailed description of the problem. What problem is this blueprint -addressing? - -Use Cases ---------- - -What use cases does this address? What impact on actors does this change have? -Ensure you are clear about the actors in each use case: Developer, End User, -Deployer etc. - -Proposed change -=============== - -Here is where you cover the change you propose to make in detail. How do you -propose to solve this problem? - -If this is one part of a larger effort make it clear where this piece ends. In -other words, what's the scope of this effort? - -At this point, if you would like to just get feedback on if the problem and -proposed change fit in mogan, you can stop here and post this for review to get -preliminary feedback. If so please say: -Posting to get preliminary feedback on the scope of this spec. - -Alternatives ------------- - -What other ways could we do this thing? Why aren't we using those? This doesn't -have to be a full literature review, but it should demonstrate that thought has -been put into why the proposed solution is an appropriate one. - -Data model impact ------------------ - -Changes which require modifications to the data model often have a wider impact -on the system. The community often has strong opinions on how the data model -should be evolved, from both a functional and performance perspective. It is -therefore important to capture and gain agreement as early as possible on any -proposed changes to the data model. - -Questions which need to be addressed by this section include: - -* What new data objects and/or database schema changes is this going to - require? - -* What database migrations will accompany this change. - -* How will the initial set of new data objects be generated, for example if you - need to take into account existing instances, or modify other existing data - describe how that will work. - -REST API impact ---------------- - -Each API method which is either added or changed should have the following - -* Specification for the method - - * A description of what the method does suitable for use in - user documentation - - * Method type (POST/PUT/GET/DELETE) - - * Normal http response code(s) - - * Expected error http response code(s) - - * A description for each possible error code should be included - describing semantic errors which can cause it such as - inconsistent parameters supplied to the method, or when an - instance is not in an appropriate state for the request to - succeed. Errors caused by syntactic problems covered by the JSON - schema definition do not need to be included. - - * URL for the resource - - * URL should not include underscores, and use hyphens instead. - - * Parameters which can be passed via the url - - * JSON schema definition for the request body data if allowed - - * Field names should use snake_case style, not CamelCase or MixedCase - style. - - * JSON schema definition for the response body data if any - - * Field names should use snake_case style, not CamelCase or MixedCase - style. - -* Example use case including typical API samples for both data supplied - by the caller and the response - -* Discuss any policy changes, and discuss what things a deployer needs to - think about when defining their policy. - -Note that the schema should be defined as restrictively as -possible. Parameters which are required should be marked as such and -only under exceptional circumstances should additional parameters -which are not defined in the schema be permitted (eg -additionaProperties should be False). - -Reuse of existing predefined parameter types such as regexps for -passwords and user defined names is highly encouraged. - -Security impact ---------------- - -Describe any potential security impact on the system. Some of the items to -consider include: - -* Does this change touch sensitive data such as tokens, keys, or user data? - -* Does this change alter the API in a way that may impact security, such as - a new way to access sensitive information or a new way to login? - -* Does this change involve cryptography or hashing? - -* Does this change require the use of sudo or any elevated privileges? - -* Does this change involve using or parsing user-provided data? This could - be directly at the API level or indirectly such as changes to a cache layer. - -* Can this change enable a resource exhaustion attack, such as allowing a - single API interaction to consume significant server resources? Some examples - of this include launching subprocesses for each connection, or entity - expansion attacks in XML. - -For more detailed guidance, please see the OpenStack Security Guidelines as -a reference (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Security/Guidelines). These -guidelines are a work in progress and are designed to help you identify -security best practices. For further information, feel free to reach out -to the OpenStack Security Group at openstack-security@lists.openstack.org. - -Notifications impact --------------------- - -Please specify any changes to notifications. Be that an extra notification, -changes to an existing notification, or removing a notification. - -Other end user impact ---------------------- - -Aside from the API, are there other ways a user will interact with this -feature? - -* Does this change have an impact on python-moganclient? What does the user - interface there look like? - -Performance Impact ------------------- - -Describe any potential performance impact on the system, for example -how often will new code be called, and is there a major change to the calling -pattern of existing code. - -Examples of things to consider here include: - -* A periodic task might look like a small addition but if it calls conductor or - another service the load is multiplied by the number of nodes in the system. - -* Scheduler filters get called once per host for every instance being created, - so any latency they introduce is linear with the size of the system. - -* A small change in a utility function or a commonly used decorator can have a - large impacts on performance. - -* Calls which result in a database queries (whether direct or via conductor) - can have a profound impact on performance when called in critical sections of - the code. - -* Will the change include any locking, and if so what considerations are there - on holding the lock? - -Other deployer impact ---------------------- - -Discuss things that will affect how you deploy and configure OpenStack -that have not already been mentioned, such as: - -* What config options are being added? Should they be more generic than - proposed (for example a flag that other hypervisor drivers might want to - implement as well)? Are the default values ones which will work well in - real deployments? - -* Is this a change that takes immediate effect after its merged, or is it - something that has to be explicitly enabled? - -* If this change is a new binary, how would it be deployed? - -* Please state anything that those doing continuous deployment, or those - upgrading from the previous release, need to be aware of. Also describe - any plans to deprecate configuration values or features. For example, if we - change the directory name that instances are stored in, how do we handle - instance directories created before the change landed? Do we move them? Do - we have a special case in the code? Do we assume that the operator will - recreate all the instances in their cloud? - -Developer impact ----------------- - -Discuss things that will affect other developers working on OpenStack, -such as: - -* If the blueprint proposes a change to the driver API, discussion of how - other hypervisors would implement the feature is required. - - -Implementation -============== - -Assignee(s) ------------ - -Who is leading the writing of the code? Or is this a blueprint where you're -throwing it out there to see who picks it up? - -If more than one person is working on the implementation, please designate the -primary author and contact. - -Primary assignee: - - -Other contributors: - - -Work Items ----------- - -Work items or tasks -- break the feature up into the things that need to be -done to implement it. Those parts might end up being done by different people, -but we're mostly trying to understand the timeline for implementation. - - -Dependencies -============ - -* Include specific references to specs and/or blueprints in mogan, or in other - projects, that this one either depends on or is related to. - -* If this requires functionality of another project that is not currently used - by Mogan, document that fact. - -* Does this feature require any new library dependencies or code otherwise not - included in OpenStack? Or does it depend on a specific version of library? - - -Testing -======= - -Please discuss the important scenarios needed to test here, as well as -specific edge cases we should be ensuring work correctly. For each -scenario please specify if this requires specialized hardware, a full -openstack environment, or can be simulated inside the Mogan tree. - -Please discuss how the change will be tested. We especially want to know what -tempest tests will be added. It is assumed that unit test coverage will be -added so that doesn't need to be mentioned explicitly, but discussion of why -you think unit tests are sufficient and we don't need to add more tempest -tests would need to be included. - -Is this untestable in gate given current limitations (specific hardware / -software configurations available)? If so, are there mitigation plans (3rd -party testing, gate enhancements, etc). - - -Documentation Impact -==================== - -Which audiences are affected most by this change, and which documentation -titles on docs.openstack.org should be updated because of this change? Don't -repeat details discussed above, but reference them here in the context of -documentation for multiple audiences. For example, the Operations Guide targets -cloud operators, and the End User Guide would need to be updated if the change -offers a new feature available through the CLI or dashboard. If a config option -changes or is deprecated, note here that the documentation needs to be updated -to reflect this specification's change. - -References -========== - -Please add any useful references here. You are not required to have any -reference. Moreover, this specification should still make sense when your -references are unavailable. Examples of what you could include are: - -* Links to mailing list or IRC discussions - -* Links to notes from a summit session - -* Links to relevant research, if appropriate - -* Related specifications as appropriate (e.g. if it's an EC2 thing, link the - EC2 docs) - -* Anything else you feel it is worthwhile to refer to - -.. list-table:: Revisions - :header-rows: 1 - - * - Release Name - - Description - * - Ocata - - Introduced diff --git a/specs/pike/approved/template.rst b/specs/pike/approved/template.rst new file mode 120000 index 0000000..cf443d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/specs/pike/approved/template.rst @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +../../template.rst \ No newline at end of file