mogan-specs/specs/pike/approved/new-flavor.rst
Zhenguo Niu 5fed727f7c Update new-flavor specs
This adds resource_aggregates field to associate resources group
information with the flavor.

Change-Id: I2e9ebbd967c86e419e4513a4cb4ebd585bdc8a5e
2017-08-01 01:47:42 +00:00

6.9 KiB

New Flavor

https://blueprints.launchpad.net/mogan/+spec/new-flavor

Ironic added a "resource class" attribute to the primary node object represents the hardware specs. And not like VMs, baremetal nodes are consumed atomically, not piecemeal, so we would like to have the scheduler using a simplified search for the baremetal nodes that only looks for node that has a particular resource class.

Operators are the people who create the flavors and set the baremetal node resource class attribute, so we need to add a 'resources' field to the flavor which can include one or more resource classes (not only baremetal node, may also extend to add other resources later). And a 'description' field would be added for operators to fill the detail hardware profile.

Problem description

Currently, we just use the flavor name to match with the baremetal nodes, which is not flexible, as we also want to support associating one flavor to some different resource classes. And the detail hardware properties fields make the flavor too complex, we need to keep the flavor simple.

Use Cases

Operators and users wish to use a simple flavor/scheduler to search for baremetal nodes.

Proposed change

We proposes to add a resources field which can associate one or more resource classes with the required quantities, like I need $N this resource, but for baremetal node, it's atomic, so it always be 1. And we also need a description field for hardware profile. For Valence integration, the flavor.resources can also reference to a Valence flavor which include all detail required hardware properties.

The operator might define the flavors as such:

- baremetal-gold
  resources:
    CUSTOM_BAREMETAL_GOLD: 1
  resource_traits:
    CUSTOM_BAREMETAL_GOLD: FPGA
  resource_aggregates:
    high_mem: true
  description:
    Intel(R) Xeon(R) E5620 2.40GHz 16 cores, 8GB RAM

- baremetal-RSD-gold
  resources:
    valence-gold-flavor: 1
  resource_traits:
    valence-gold-flavor: PodM1
  description:
    Intel(R) Xeon(R) E5620 2.40GHz 16 cores, 8GB RAM

Alternatives

None

Data model impact

The proposed change will be adding the following fields to the flavor object with their data type and default value for migrations.

Field Name Field Type Default Value
uuid UUID None
name String None
resources DictOfString None
resource_traits DictOfString None
resource_aggregates DictOfString None
description String None
is_public Bool True
disabled Bool False

The resources field indicates the resource quantities, the resource_traits field reference to the resource qualities, and the resource_aggregates field includes the group information.

The disabled field is intended to be used when phasing out flavors. In this case, a delete wouldn't work because the flavor needs to still be available for live servers using that flavor, but we don't want to allow new servers created from that flavor. And we propose to deny deleting flavors if they are associated with servers.

REST API impact

REST API will be changed as part of this change.

  • To create a new flavor, a user will:

    POST /v1/flavors

    With a body containing the JSON description of the flavor.

    JSON Schema:

    {
        "type": "object",
        "properties": {
            'name': {'type': 'string', 'minLength': 1, 'maxLength': 255},
            'resources': {
                'type': 'object',
                'patternProperties': {
                    '^[a-zA-Z0-9-_:. ]{1,255}$': {
                        'type': 'integer', 'minimum': 1
                    }
                },
                'additionalProperties': False
            },
            'resource_traits': {
                'type': 'object',
                'patternProperties': {
                    '^[a-zA-Z0-9-_:. ]{1,255}$': {
                        'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 255
                    }
                },
                'additionalProperties': False
            },
            'resource_aggregates': {
                'type': 'object',
                'patternProperties': {
                    '^[a-zA-Z0-9-_:. ]{1,255}$': {
                        'type': 'string', 'maxLength': 255
                    }
                },
                'additionalProperties': False
            },
            'description': {'type': 'string', 'minLength': 1},
            'disabled': {'type': 'boolean'},
            'is_public': {'type': 'boolean'},
        },
        'required': ['name', 'resources', 'description'],
        'additionalProperties': False,
    }
  • To update a flavor, a user will:

    PATCH /v1/flavors/flavor_uuid

    We only allow to update below attributes:

    ['/name', '/is_public', '/disabled']

    Example of request BODY:

    {
        "op": "replace",
        "path": "/disabled",
        "value": true
    }

    Update other properties is not allowed, as it will make server properties not consistent with the real hardware. Users need to create a new flavor instead in this scenario. And when creating a server, we will check if the specified flavor is disabled.

Security impact

None

Notifications impact

None

Other end user impact

None

Performance Impact

None

Other deployer impact

None

Developer impact

None

Implementation

Assignee(s)

Primary assignee:

<niu-zglinux>

Work Items

  • Modify flavor object with the proposed fields.
  • Change REST API to support new flavor properties.
  • Change scheduler filters/weighters to match the new flavor.
  • Change CLI to support flavor management.
  • Add UT and docs.

Dependencies

None

Testing

Unit Testing will be added.

Documentation Impact

Docs about new flavor will be added.

References

None