remove E251 exemption from pep8 check
This change removes the exemption for E251 by addressing unexpected spaces around keyword/parameter equals Change-Id: Iff17477e37bef2a97fc58a538d08bcfc35c67751 Partial-Bug: 1329017
This commit is contained in:
parent
712b9c3160
commit
3f99176725
@ -209,9 +209,10 @@ class MetadataProxyHandler(object):
|
||||
req.query_string,
|
||||
''))
|
||||
|
||||
h = httplib2.Http(ca_certs=self.conf.auth_ca_cert,
|
||||
disable_ssl_certificate_validation=
|
||||
self.conf.nova_metadata_insecure)
|
||||
h = httplib2.Http(
|
||||
ca_certs=self.conf.auth_ca_cert,
|
||||
disable_ssl_certificate_validation=self.conf.nova_metadata_insecure
|
||||
)
|
||||
if self.conf.nova_client_cert and self.conf.nova_client_priv_key:
|
||||
h.add_certificate(self.conf.nova_client_priv_key,
|
||||
self.conf.nova_client_cert,
|
||||
|
@ -187,8 +187,8 @@ class Firewall_db_mixin(firewall.FirewallPluginBase, base_db.CommonDbMixin):
|
||||
# If we find an invalid rule in the list we
|
||||
# do not perform the update since this breaks
|
||||
# the integrity of this list.
|
||||
raise firewall.FirewallRuleNotFound(firewall_rule_id=
|
||||
fwrule_id)
|
||||
raise firewall.FirewallRuleNotFound(
|
||||
firewall_rule_id=fwrule_id)
|
||||
elif rules_dict[fwrule_id]['firewall_policy_id']:
|
||||
if (rules_dict[fwrule_id]['firewall_policy_id'] !=
|
||||
fwp_db['id']):
|
||||
@ -273,14 +273,14 @@ class Firewall_db_mixin(firewall.FirewallPluginBase, base_db.CommonDbMixin):
|
||||
status = (const.CREATED
|
||||
if cfg.CONF.router_distributed else const.PENDING_CREATE)
|
||||
with context.session.begin(subtransactions=True):
|
||||
firewall_db = Firewall(id=uuidutils.generate_uuid(),
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
name=fw['name'],
|
||||
description=fw['description'],
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=
|
||||
fw['firewall_policy_id'],
|
||||
admin_state_up=fw['admin_state_up'],
|
||||
status=status)
|
||||
firewall_db = Firewall(
|
||||
id=uuidutils.generate_uuid(),
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
name=fw['name'],
|
||||
description=fw['description'],
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fw['firewall_policy_id'],
|
||||
admin_state_up=fw['admin_state_up'],
|
||||
status=status)
|
||||
context.session.add(firewall_db)
|
||||
return self._make_firewall_dict(firewall_db)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -396,22 +396,22 @@ class Firewall_db_mixin(firewall.FirewallPluginBase, base_db.CommonDbMixin):
|
||||
dst_port_min, dst_port_max = self._get_min_max_ports_from_range(
|
||||
fwr['destination_port'])
|
||||
with context.session.begin(subtransactions=True):
|
||||
fwr_db = FirewallRule(id=uuidutils.generate_uuid(),
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
name=fwr['name'],
|
||||
description=fwr['description'],
|
||||
shared=fwr['shared'],
|
||||
protocol=fwr['protocol'],
|
||||
ip_version=fwr['ip_version'],
|
||||
source_ip_address=fwr['source_ip_address'],
|
||||
destination_ip_address=
|
||||
fwr['destination_ip_address'],
|
||||
source_port_range_min=src_port_min,
|
||||
source_port_range_max=src_port_max,
|
||||
destination_port_range_min=dst_port_min,
|
||||
destination_port_range_max=dst_port_max,
|
||||
action=fwr['action'],
|
||||
enabled=fwr['enabled'])
|
||||
fwr_db = FirewallRule(
|
||||
id=uuidutils.generate_uuid(),
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
name=fwr['name'],
|
||||
description=fwr['description'],
|
||||
shared=fwr['shared'],
|
||||
protocol=fwr['protocol'],
|
||||
ip_version=fwr['ip_version'],
|
||||
source_ip_address=fwr['source_ip_address'],
|
||||
destination_ip_address=fwr['destination_ip_address'],
|
||||
source_port_range_min=src_port_min,
|
||||
source_port_range_max=src_port_max,
|
||||
destination_port_range_min=dst_port_min,
|
||||
destination_port_range_max=dst_port_max,
|
||||
action=fwr['action'],
|
||||
enabled=fwr['enabled'])
|
||||
context.session.add(fwr_db)
|
||||
return self._make_firewall_rule_dict(fwr_db)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ class MeteringDbMixin(metering.MeteringPluginBase,
|
||||
cidrs = [r['remote_ip_prefix'] for r in r_ips]
|
||||
new_cidr_ipset = netaddr.IPSet([remote_ip_prefix])
|
||||
if (netaddr.IPSet(cidrs) & new_cidr_ipset):
|
||||
raise metering.MeteringLabelRuleOverlaps(remote_ip_prefix=
|
||||
remote_ip_prefix)
|
||||
raise metering.MeteringLabelRuleOverlaps(
|
||||
remote_ip_prefix=remote_ip_prefix)
|
||||
|
||||
def create_metering_label_rule(self, context, metering_label_rule):
|
||||
m = metering_label_rule['metering_label_rule']
|
||||
|
@ -152,15 +152,15 @@ def convert_protocol(value):
|
||||
if 0 <= val <= 255:
|
||||
return val
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise FirewallRuleInvalidProtocol(protocol=value,
|
||||
values=
|
||||
fw_valid_protocol_values)
|
||||
raise FirewallRuleInvalidProtocol(
|
||||
protocol=value,
|
||||
values=fw_valid_protocol_values)
|
||||
elif value.lower() in fw_valid_protocol_values:
|
||||
return value.lower()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
raise FirewallRuleInvalidProtocol(protocol=value,
|
||||
values=
|
||||
fw_valid_protocol_values)
|
||||
raise FirewallRuleInvalidProtocol(
|
||||
protocol=value,
|
||||
values=fw_valid_protocol_values)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
def convert_action_to_case_insensitive(value):
|
||||
|
@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ class DeviceHandlingMixin(object):
|
||||
with context.session.begin(subtransactions=True):
|
||||
hd_db = l3_models.HostingDevice(
|
||||
id=hd.get('id') or uuidutils.generate_uuid(),
|
||||
complementary_id = hd.get('complementary_id'),
|
||||
complementary_id=hd.get('complementary_id'),
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
device_id=hd.get('device_id'),
|
||||
admin_state_up=hd.get('admin_state_up', True),
|
||||
|
@ -943,9 +943,9 @@ def update_profile_binding(db_session, profile_id, tenants, profile_type):
|
||||
profile_id=profile_id, profile_type=profile_type).delete()
|
||||
new_tenants_set = set(tenants)
|
||||
for tenant_id in new_tenants_set:
|
||||
tenant = n1kv_models_v2.ProfileBinding(profile_type = profile_type,
|
||||
tenant_id = tenant_id,
|
||||
profile_id = profile_id)
|
||||
tenant = n1kv_models_v2.ProfileBinding(profile_type=profile_type,
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
profile_id=profile_id)
|
||||
db_session.add(tenant)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -155,9 +155,10 @@ class TestBigSwitchProxyPortsV2(test_plugin.TestPortsV2,
|
||||
# stop normal patch
|
||||
self.httpPatch.stop()
|
||||
with patch(HTTPCON, new=fake_server.HTTPConnectionMock500):
|
||||
self._delete('ports', port['port']['id'],
|
||||
expected_code=
|
||||
webob.exc.HTTPInternalServerError.code)
|
||||
self._delete(
|
||||
'ports',
|
||||
port['port']['id'],
|
||||
expected_code=webob.exc.HTTPInternalServerError.code)
|
||||
self.httpPatch.start()
|
||||
port = self._get_ports(n['network']['id'])[0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual('BUILD', port['status'])
|
||||
|
@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ class RouterSchedulingTestCase(L3RouterApplianceTestCaseBase,
|
||||
self.assertIsNotNone(hosting_device_1)
|
||||
cfg_dh_rpc.report_non_responding_hosting_devices(
|
||||
self.adminContext,
|
||||
host = None,
|
||||
host=None,
|
||||
hosting_device_ids=[hosting_device_1['id']])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(1, mock_notify.call_count)
|
||||
mock_notify.assert_called_with(
|
||||
|
@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ class TestN1kvNetworkProfiles(N1kvPluginTestCase):
|
||||
net_p_req = self.new_create_request('network_profiles', data)
|
||||
net_p_req.environ['neutron.context'] = context.Context('',
|
||||
self.tenant_id,
|
||||
is_admin = True)
|
||||
is_admin=True)
|
||||
res = net_p_req.get_response(self.ext_api)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(201, res.status_int)
|
||||
net_p = self.deserialize(self.fmt, res)
|
||||
@ -612,7 +612,7 @@ class TestN1kvNetworkProfiles(N1kvPluginTestCase):
|
||||
net_p['network_profile']['id'])
|
||||
update_req.environ['neutron.context'] = context.Context('',
|
||||
self.tenant_id,
|
||||
is_admin = True)
|
||||
is_admin=True)
|
||||
update_res = update_req.get_response(self.ext_api)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(200, update_res.status_int)
|
||||
db_session = db.get_session()
|
||||
@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ class TestN1kvNetworkProfiles(N1kvPluginTestCase):
|
||||
net_p['network_profile']['id'])
|
||||
update_req.environ['neutron.context'] = context.Context('',
|
||||
self.tenant_id,
|
||||
is_admin = True)
|
||||
is_admin=True)
|
||||
update_res = update_req.get_response(self.ext_api)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(200, update_res.status_int)
|
||||
# current tenant_id should always present
|
||||
|
@ -624,9 +624,9 @@ class TestFirewallDBPlugin(FirewallPluginDbTestCase):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
ADMIN_STATE_UP):
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=ADMIN_STATE_UP):
|
||||
req = self.new_delete_request('firewall_policies', fwp_id)
|
||||
res = req.get_response(self.ext_api)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.status_int, 409)
|
||||
@ -896,10 +896,11 @@ class TestFirewallDBPlugin(FirewallPluginDbTestCase):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(name=attrs['name'],
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
name=attrs['name'],
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
) as firewall:
|
||||
for k, v in attrs.iteritems():
|
||||
self.assertEqual(firewall['firewall'][k], v)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -919,10 +920,10 @@ class TestFirewallDBPlugin(FirewallPluginDbTestCase):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(name=name,
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
name=name,
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
req = self.new_show_request('firewalls',
|
||||
firewall['firewall']['id'],
|
||||
fmt=self.fmt)
|
||||
@ -953,9 +954,9 @@ class TestFirewallDBPlugin(FirewallPluginDbTestCase):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
data = {'firewall': {'name': name}}
|
||||
req = self.new_update_request('firewalls', data,
|
||||
firewall['firewall']['id'])
|
||||
|
@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ class AristaL3DriverTestCasesMlag_one_switch_failed(base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
tenant = '123'
|
||||
|
||||
# Make one of the switches throw an exception - i.e. fail
|
||||
self.drv._servers[0].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect = Exception())
|
||||
self.drv._servers[0].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect=Exception)
|
||||
self.drv.create_router(None, tenant, router)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_delete_router_when_one_switch_fails(self):
|
||||
@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ class AristaL3DriverTestCasesMlag_one_switch_failed(base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
router_id = '345'
|
||||
|
||||
# Make one of the switches throw an exception - i.e. fail
|
||||
self.drv._servers[1].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect = Exception())
|
||||
self.drv._servers[1].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect=Exception)
|
||||
self.drv.delete_router(None, tenant, router_id, router)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_add_router_interface_when_one_switch_fails(self):
|
||||
@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ class AristaL3DriverTestCasesMlag_one_switch_failed(base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
router['gip'] = '10.10.10.1'
|
||||
|
||||
# Make one of the switches throw an exception - i.e. fail
|
||||
self.drv._servers[1].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect = Exception())
|
||||
self.drv._servers[1].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect=Exception)
|
||||
self.drv.add_router_interface(None, router)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_remove_router_interface_when_one_switch_fails(self):
|
||||
@ -452,5 +452,5 @@ class AristaL3DriverTestCasesMlag_one_switch_failed(base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
router['gip'] = '10.10.10.1'
|
||||
|
||||
# Make one of the switches throw an exception - i.e. fail
|
||||
self.drv._servers[0].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect = Exception())
|
||||
self.drv._servers[0].runCmds = mock.Mock(side_effect=Exception)
|
||||
self.drv.remove_router_interface(None, router)
|
||||
|
@ -115,15 +115,27 @@ class TestOFAgentFlows(ofa_test_base.OFATestBase):
|
||||
(dp, ofp, ofpp) = br._get_dp()
|
||||
call = mock.call
|
||||
expected_calls = [
|
||||
call(ofpp.OFPFlowMod(dp, instructions=[
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionActions(ofp.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
|
||||
[ofpp.OFPActionSetField(tunnel_id=112),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionOutput(port=113),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionOutput(port=114)]),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionGotoTable(table_id=111)],
|
||||
match=ofpp.OFPMatch(metadata=
|
||||
meta.mk_metadata(111, meta.LOCAL)),
|
||||
priority=1, table_id=110))
|
||||
call(
|
||||
ofpp.OFPFlowMod(
|
||||
dp,
|
||||
instructions=[
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionActions(
|
||||
ofp.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
|
||||
[
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionSetField(tunnel_id=112),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionOutput(port=113),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionOutput(port=114)
|
||||
]
|
||||
),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionGotoTable(table_id=111)
|
||||
],
|
||||
match=ofpp.OFPMatch(
|
||||
metadata=meta.mk_metadata(111, meta.LOCAL)
|
||||
),
|
||||
priority=1,
|
||||
table_id=110
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
sendmsg.assert_has_calls(expected_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -134,11 +146,17 @@ class TestOFAgentFlows(ofa_test_base.OFATestBase):
|
||||
(dp, ofp, ofpp) = br._get_dp()
|
||||
call = mock.call
|
||||
expected_calls = [
|
||||
call(ofpp.OFPFlowMod(dp, command=ofp.OFPFC_DELETE,
|
||||
match=ofpp.OFPMatch(metadata=
|
||||
meta.mk_metadata(111, meta.LOCAL)),
|
||||
out_group=ofp.OFPG_ANY,
|
||||
out_port=ofp.OFPP_ANY, priority=0, table_id=110))
|
||||
call(
|
||||
ofpp.OFPFlowMod(
|
||||
dp,
|
||||
command=ofp.OFPFC_DELETE,
|
||||
match=ofpp.OFPMatch(
|
||||
metadata=meta.mk_metadata(111, meta.LOCAL)
|
||||
),
|
||||
out_group=ofp.OFPG_ANY,
|
||||
out_port=ofp.OFPP_ANY, priority=0, table_id=110
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
sendmsg.assert_has_calls(expected_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -189,15 +207,30 @@ class TestOFAgentFlows(ofa_test_base.OFATestBase):
|
||||
match=ofpp.OFPMatch(in_port=99,
|
||||
vlan_vid=151 | ofp.OFPVID_PRESENT),
|
||||
priority=1, table_id=0)),
|
||||
call(ofpp.OFPFlowMod(dp, instructions=[
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionActions(ofp.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS, [
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionPushVlan(),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionSetField(vlan_vid=151 | ofp.OFPVID_PRESENT),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionOutput(port=99), ofpp.OFPActionPopVlan()]),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionGotoTable(table_id=13)],
|
||||
match=ofpp.OFPMatch(metadata=
|
||||
meta.mk_metadata(150, meta.LOCAL)),
|
||||
priority=1, table_id=12))
|
||||
call(
|
||||
ofpp.OFPFlowMod(
|
||||
dp,
|
||||
instructions=[
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionActions(
|
||||
ofp.OFPIT_APPLY_ACTIONS,
|
||||
[
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionPushVlan(),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionSetField(
|
||||
vlan_vid=151 | ofp.OFPVID_PRESENT
|
||||
),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionOutput(port=99),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPActionPopVlan()
|
||||
]
|
||||
),
|
||||
ofpp.OFPInstructionGotoTable(table_id=13)
|
||||
],
|
||||
match=ofpp.OFPMatch(
|
||||
metadata=meta.mk_metadata(150, meta.LOCAL)
|
||||
),
|
||||
priority=1,
|
||||
table_id=12
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
]
|
||||
sendmsg.assert_has_calls(expected_calls)
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -43,9 +43,10 @@ class TestFirewallCallbacks(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase):
|
||||
ctx = context.get_admin_context()
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as fw:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
) as fw:
|
||||
fw_id = fw['firewall']['id']
|
||||
res = self.callbacks.set_firewall_status(ctx, fw_id,
|
||||
const.ACTIVE,
|
||||
@ -63,9 +64,10 @@ class TestFirewallCallbacks(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase):
|
||||
ctx = context.get_admin_context()
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as fw:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
) as fw:
|
||||
fw_id = fw['firewall']['id']
|
||||
fw_db = self.plugin._get_firewall(ctx, fw_id)
|
||||
fw_db['status'] = const.PENDING_DELETE
|
||||
@ -131,10 +133,10 @@ class TestFirewallCallbacks(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase):
|
||||
res = req.get_response(self.ext_api)
|
||||
attrs = self._get_test_firewall_attrs()
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as fw:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
tenant_id=tenant_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as fw:
|
||||
fw_id = fw['firewall']['id']
|
||||
res = self.callbacks.get_firewalls_for_tenant(ctx,
|
||||
host='dummy')
|
||||
@ -229,9 +231,10 @@ class TestFirewallPluginBase(test_db_firewall.TestFirewallDBPlugin):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
) as firewall:
|
||||
fw_id = firewall['firewall']['id']
|
||||
res = self.callbacks.set_firewall_status(ctx, fw_id,
|
||||
const.ACTIVE)
|
||||
@ -252,9 +255,10 @@ class TestFirewallPluginBase(test_db_firewall.TestFirewallDBPlugin):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
) as firewall:
|
||||
fw_id = firewall['firewall']['id']
|
||||
data = {'firewall': {'name': name}}
|
||||
req = self.new_update_request('firewalls', data, fw_id)
|
||||
@ -265,10 +269,11 @@ class TestFirewallPluginBase(test_db_firewall.TestFirewallDBPlugin):
|
||||
ctx = context.get_admin_context()
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
tenant_id='noadmin') as firewall:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
tenant_id='noadmin'
|
||||
) as firewall:
|
||||
fw_id = firewall['firewall']['id']
|
||||
self.callbacks.set_firewall_status(ctx, fw_id,
|
||||
const.ACTIVE)
|
||||
@ -286,9 +291,10 @@ class TestFirewallPluginBase(test_db_firewall.TestFirewallDBPlugin):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP):
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
):
|
||||
data = {'firewall_policy': {'name': name}}
|
||||
req = self.new_update_request('firewall_policies',
|
||||
data, fwp_id)
|
||||
@ -306,9 +312,10 @@ class TestFirewallPluginBase(test_db_firewall.TestFirewallDBPlugin):
|
||||
req = self.new_update_request('firewall_policies', data,
|
||||
fwp_id)
|
||||
req.get_response(self.ext_api)
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP):
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
):
|
||||
data = {'firewall_rule': {'protocol': 'udp'}}
|
||||
req = self.new_update_request('firewall_rules',
|
||||
data, fr_id)
|
||||
@ -323,9 +330,10 @@ class TestFirewallPluginBase(test_db_firewall.TestFirewallDBPlugin):
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as firewall:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
) as firewall:
|
||||
fw_id = firewall['firewall']['id']
|
||||
attrs = self._replace_firewall_status(attrs,
|
||||
const.PENDING_CREATE,
|
||||
@ -367,9 +375,10 @@ class TestFirewallPluginBase(test_db_firewall.TestFirewallDBPlugin):
|
||||
req.get_response(self.ext_api)
|
||||
attrs = self._get_test_firewall_attrs()
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP) as fw:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
) as fw:
|
||||
fw_id = fw['firewall']['id']
|
||||
fw_rules = (
|
||||
self.plugin._make_firewall_dict_with_rules(ctx,
|
||||
|
@ -272,10 +272,11 @@ class TestHaproxyNSDriver(base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
'test_interface',
|
||||
'mac_addr',
|
||||
namespace='test_ns')
|
||||
self.vif_driver.init_l3.assert_called_once_with('test_interface',
|
||||
['10.0.0.2/24'],
|
||||
namespace=
|
||||
'test_ns')
|
||||
self.vif_driver.init_l3.assert_called_once_with(
|
||||
'test_interface',
|
||||
['10.0.0.2/24'],
|
||||
namespace='test_ns'
|
||||
)
|
||||
cmd = ['route', 'add', 'default', 'gw', '10.0.0.1']
|
||||
cmd_arping = ['arping', '-U', '-I',
|
||||
'test_interface', '-c',
|
||||
@ -339,10 +340,11 @@ class TestHaproxyNSDriver(base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
'test_interface',
|
||||
'mac_addr',
|
||||
namespace='test_ns')
|
||||
self.vif_driver.init_l3.assert_called_once_with('test_interface',
|
||||
['10.0.0.2/24'],
|
||||
namespace=
|
||||
'test_ns')
|
||||
self.vif_driver.init_l3.assert_called_once_with(
|
||||
'test_interface',
|
||||
['10.0.0.2/24'],
|
||||
namespace='test_ns'
|
||||
)
|
||||
self.assertFalse(ip_wrap.called)
|
||||
dev_exists.return_value = True
|
||||
self.assertRaises(exceptions.PreexistingDeviceFailure,
|
||||
@ -375,10 +377,11 @@ class TestHaproxyNSDriver(base.BaseTestCase):
|
||||
'test_interface',
|
||||
'mac_addr',
|
||||
namespace='test_ns')
|
||||
self.vif_driver.init_l3.assert_called_once_with('test_interface',
|
||||
['10.0.0.2/24'],
|
||||
namespace=
|
||||
'test_ns')
|
||||
self.vif_driver.init_l3.assert_called_once_with(
|
||||
'test_interface',
|
||||
['10.0.0.2/24'],
|
||||
namespace='test_ns'
|
||||
)
|
||||
cmd = ['route', 'add', 'default', 'gw', '10.0.0.1']
|
||||
ip_wrap.assert_has_calls([
|
||||
mock.call('sudo_test', namespace='test_ns'),
|
||||
|
@ -148,10 +148,9 @@ class FirewallExtensionTestCase(test_api_v2_extension.ExtensionTestCase):
|
||||
res = self.api.post(_get_path('fw/firewall_rules', fmt=self.fmt),
|
||||
self.serialize(data),
|
||||
content_type='application/%s' % self.fmt)
|
||||
instance.create_firewall_rule.assert_called_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
firewall_rule=
|
||||
{'firewall_rule':
|
||||
expected_call_args})
|
||||
instance.create_firewall_rule.assert_called_with(
|
||||
mock.ANY,
|
||||
firewall_rule={'firewall_rule': expected_call_args})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.status_int, exc.HTTPCreated.code)
|
||||
res = self.deserialize(res)
|
||||
self.assertIn('firewall_rule', res)
|
||||
@ -213,10 +212,10 @@ class FirewallExtensionTestCase(test_api_v2_extension.ExtensionTestCase):
|
||||
fmt=self.fmt),
|
||||
self.serialize(update_data))
|
||||
|
||||
instance.update_firewall_rule.assert_called_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
rule_id,
|
||||
firewall_rule=
|
||||
update_data)
|
||||
instance.update_firewall_rule.assert_called_with(
|
||||
mock.ANY,
|
||||
rule_id,
|
||||
firewall_rule=update_data)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.status_int, exc.HTTPOk.code)
|
||||
res = self.deserialize(res)
|
||||
self.assertIn('firewall_rule', res)
|
||||
@ -242,9 +241,9 @@ class FirewallExtensionTestCase(test_api_v2_extension.ExtensionTestCase):
|
||||
fmt=self.fmt),
|
||||
self.serialize(data),
|
||||
content_type='application/%s' % self.fmt)
|
||||
instance.create_firewall_policy.assert_called_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
firewall_policy=
|
||||
data)
|
||||
instance.create_firewall_policy.assert_called_with(
|
||||
mock.ANY,
|
||||
firewall_policy=data)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.status_int, exc.HTTPCreated.code)
|
||||
res = self.deserialize(res)
|
||||
self.assertIn('firewall_policy', res)
|
||||
@ -299,10 +298,10 @@ class FirewallExtensionTestCase(test_api_v2_extension.ExtensionTestCase):
|
||||
fmt=self.fmt),
|
||||
self.serialize(update_data))
|
||||
|
||||
instance.update_firewall_policy.assert_called_with(mock.ANY,
|
||||
policy_id,
|
||||
firewall_policy=
|
||||
update_data)
|
||||
instance.update_firewall_policy.assert_called_with(
|
||||
mock.ANY,
|
||||
policy_id,
|
||||
firewall_policy=update_data)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(res.status_int, exc.HTTPOk.code)
|
||||
res = self.deserialize(res)
|
||||
self.assertIn('firewall_policy', res)
|
||||
|
@ -130,12 +130,13 @@ class FirewallPluginTestCase(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase,
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
attrs['router_id'] = self._create_and_get_router()
|
||||
with self.firewall(name=name,
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=attrs['router_id'],
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
expected_res_status=201) as fw:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
name=name,
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=attrs['router_id'],
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
expected_res_status=201
|
||||
) as fw:
|
||||
attrs = self._replace_firewall_status(
|
||||
attrs, const.PENDING_CREATE, const.ACTIVE)
|
||||
for k, v in attrs.iteritems():
|
||||
@ -146,11 +147,12 @@ class FirewallPluginTestCase(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase,
|
||||
attrs = self._get_test_firewall_attrs(name)
|
||||
attrs['router_id'] = self._create_and_get_router()
|
||||
|
||||
with self.firewall(name=name,
|
||||
router_id=attrs['router_id'],
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
expected_res_status=201) as fw:
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
name=name,
|
||||
router_id=attrs['router_id'],
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
expected_res_status=201
|
||||
) as fw:
|
||||
attrs = self._replace_firewall_status(
|
||||
attrs, const.PENDING_CREATE, const.ACTIVE)
|
||||
for k, v in attrs.iteritems():
|
||||
@ -201,12 +203,13 @@ class FirewallPluginTestCase(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase,
|
||||
router_id = self._create_and_get_router()
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
with self.firewall(name='fw',
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=router_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
expected_res_status=201):
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
name='fw',
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=router_id,
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP,
|
||||
expected_res_status=201
|
||||
):
|
||||
self._delete('routers', router_id,
|
||||
expected_code=webob.exc.HTTPConflict.code)
|
||||
|
||||
@ -311,10 +314,11 @@ class FirewallPluginTestCase(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase,
|
||||
firewall_rules=None,
|
||||
audited=test_db_firewall.AUDITED) as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=self._create_and_get_router(),
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP):
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=self._create_and_get_router(),
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
):
|
||||
data = {'firewall_policy': {'name': name}}
|
||||
req = self.new_update_request(
|
||||
'firewall_policies', data, fwp['firewall_policy']['id'])
|
||||
@ -372,10 +376,11 @@ class FirewallPluginTestCase(test_db_firewall.FirewallPluginDbTestCase,
|
||||
with self.firewall_policy() as fwp:
|
||||
fwp_id = fwp['firewall_policy']['id']
|
||||
attrs['firewall_policy_id'] = fwp_id
|
||||
with self.firewall(firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=self._create_and_get_router(),
|
||||
admin_state_up=
|
||||
test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP):
|
||||
with self.firewall(
|
||||
firewall_policy_id=fwp_id,
|
||||
router_id=self._create_and_get_router(),
|
||||
admin_state_up=test_db_firewall.ADMIN_STATE_UP
|
||||
):
|
||||
fwr_id = fwr['firewall_rule']['id']
|
||||
data = {'firewall_policy': {'firewall_rules': [fwr_id]}}
|
||||
req = self.new_update_request(
|
||||
|
3
tox.ini
3
tox.ini
@ -64,7 +64,6 @@ commands = python setup.py build_sphinx
|
||||
# E126 continuation line over-indented for hanging indent
|
||||
# E128 continuation line under-indented for visual indent
|
||||
# E129 visually indented line with same indent as next logical line
|
||||
# E251 unexpected spaces around keyword / parameter equals
|
||||
# E265 block comment should start with ‘# ‘
|
||||
# E713 test for membership should be ‘not in’
|
||||
# F402 import module shadowed by loop variable
|
||||
@ -79,7 +78,7 @@ commands = python setup.py build_sphinx
|
||||
# H405 multi line docstring summary not separated with an empty line
|
||||
# H904 Wrap long lines in parentheses instead of a backslash
|
||||
# TODO(marun) H404 multi line docstring should start with a summary
|
||||
ignore = E125,E126,E128,E129,E251,E265,E713,F402,F811,F812,H104,H237,H305,H307,H401,H402,H404,H405,H904
|
||||
ignore = E125,E126,E128,E129,E265,E713,F402,F811,F812,H104,H237,H305,H307,H401,H402,H404,H405,H904
|
||||
show-source = true
|
||||
builtins = _
|
||||
exclude = .venv,.git,.tox,dist,doc,*openstack/common*,*lib/python*,*egg,build,tools,.ropeproject,rally-scenarios
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user