Merge "Update DefCore CoChair Description"
This commit is contained in:
commit
b360ac421d
@ -72,9 +72,9 @@ A2. Community Groups Tests into Capabilities
|
||||
4. Tests must have unique identifiers that are durable across releases
|
||||
and changes in grouping.
|
||||
5. Tests must be under OpenStack Technical Committee governance.
|
||||
6. The DefCore committee will provide the test groupings in JSON format
|
||||
6. The DefCore working group will provide the test groupings in JSON format
|
||||
for scoring.
|
||||
7. The DefCore committee will provide a human-readable summary of
|
||||
7. The DefCore working group will provide a human-readable summary of
|
||||
the Guideline generated from the JSON version.
|
||||
|
||||
A3. DefCore Collects Recommendations for Designated Sections
|
||||
@ -172,11 +172,16 @@ B3. Changes to Guideline made by Gerrit Review Process
|
||||
|
||||
B4. For Gerrit reviews, DefCore CoChairs act as joint PTLs
|
||||
|
||||
1. Board committee members of DefCore serve as "core" reviewers (+2).
|
||||
1. DefCore CoChairs serve as "core" reviewers (+2).
|
||||
2. Requests for changes must be submitted as patches by the requesting
|
||||
party.
|
||||
3. DefCore Committee members may proxy change requests as long as the
|
||||
requesting party is explicitly acknowledged.
|
||||
4. One DefCore CoChair needs to be Board member.
|
||||
5. One DefCore CoChair needs to be elected by DefCore working group. Election
|
||||
quorum is composed of attendees present during the election meeting.
|
||||
6. Additional core reviewers (+2) can be appointed by CoChairs.
|
||||
7. Election meetings must be posted at least one meeting prior.
|
||||
|
||||
Community Review & Vendor Self-Test (C)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
@ -186,7 +191,7 @@ Starting: S and continues past S+3
|
||||
C1. Vendor Self-Tests
|
||||
|
||||
1. Vendors are responsible for executing tests identified by the
|
||||
DefCore committee.
|
||||
DefCore working group.
|
||||
2. The Foundation may, but is not required to, provide tooling for
|
||||
running tests.
|
||||
3. The Foundation may, but is not required to, define a required
|
||||
@ -209,10 +214,10 @@ C2. Vendor submits results to Foundation for review
|
||||
C3. Vendor Grievance Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. Vendors may raise concerns with specific tests to the DefCore
|
||||
committee.
|
||||
2. The DefCore committee may choose to remove tests from a Guideline
|
||||
working group.
|
||||
2. The DefCore working group may choose to remove tests from a Guideline
|
||||
(known as flagging).
|
||||
3. The DefCore committee will acknowledge vendor requests to flag tests
|
||||
3. The DefCore working group will acknowledge vendor requests to flag tests
|
||||
within 30 days.
|
||||
|
||||
C4. Results of Vendor Self-Tests will be open
|
||||
@ -232,7 +237,7 @@ C4. Results of Vendor Self-Tests will be open
|
||||
|
||||
C5. API Usage Data Report
|
||||
|
||||
1. The Foundation will provide DefCore committee with an open report
|
||||
1. The Foundation will provide DefCore working group with an open report
|
||||
about API usage based on self-tests.
|
||||
2. To the extent the data is available, capabilities beyond the DefCore
|
||||
list will be included in the report.
|
||||
@ -264,7 +269,7 @@ D1. Board will review and approve DefCore Guideline from draft
|
||||
2. The DefCore Committee will submit the human-readable summary of
|
||||
capabilities (see section A2[6]) to the Board for approval.
|
||||
3. By voting to approve the summary, the Board delegates responsibility
|
||||
for maintaining test groupings to the DefCore committee subject to
|
||||
for maintaining test groupings to the DefCore working group subject to
|
||||
the limitations described in section D2.
|
||||
4. Guidelines only apply to the identified releases (a.k.a. release
|
||||
tags).
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user