interop/doc/source/process/CoreCriteria.rst
robhirschfeld dea7b57ae7 Fix typos and language (as discovered in DefCore midcycle)
Cleaned up formatting and made use of test/core go away
in favor of capability/DefCore in this document.

Also removed must-pass in favor of required.

Change-Id: I2431ba0483e23b268c1d5533906aa500b8bc1901
2015-07-31 11:01:25 -05:00

3.4 KiB

Core Criteria

General

This is a subcomponent of the larger Core Definition documentation.

Core Capability Selection uses 12 criteria grouped into four primary categories:

Usage

the capability is widely used (Refstack will collect data)

Direction

the capability advances OpenStack technically

Community

the capability builds the OpenStack community experience

System

the capability integrates with other parts of OpenStack

These categories summarize critical values that we want in OpenStack and so make sense to be the primary factors used when we select DefCore capabilities. While we strive to make the DefCore process objective and quantitive, we must recognize that these choices drive community behavior.

Graphic showing Capabilities Seleciton Criteria

Details

With this perspective, here are the selection criteria.

To make cross reference easier, criteria are given a shortened name.

SHOWS PROVEN USAGE

  • "Widely Deployed" Candidates are widely deployed capabilities. We favor capabilities that are supported by multiple public cloud providers and private cloud products.
  • "Used by Tools" Candidates are widely used capabilities:Should be included if supported by common tools (RightScale, Scalr, CloudForms, ...)
  • "Used by Clients" Candidates are widely used capabilities: Should be included if part of common libraries (Fog, Apache jclouds, etc)

ALIGNS WITH TECHNICAL DIRECTION

  • "Future Direction" Should reflect future technical direction (from the project technical teams and the TC) and help manage deprecated capabilities.
  • "Stable" Capabilities are required to be stable for >2 releases because we do not want DefCore capabilities that do not have dependable APIs.
  • "Complete" Where the code being tested has a designated area of alternate implementation (extension framework) as per the DefCore Principles, there should be parity in capability tested across extension implementations. This also implies that the capability test is not configuration specific or locked to non-open technology.

PLAYS WELL WITH OTHERS

  • "Discoverable" Capability being tested is Service Discoverable (can be found in Keystone and via service introspection)
  • "Doc'd" Should be well documented, particularly the expected behavior. This can be a very subjective measure and we expect to refine this definition over time.
  • "DefCore in Last Release" A required capability should stay a required capability. This make makes DefCore capabilities sticky release per release. Leaving DefCore is disruptive to the ecosystem

TAKES A SYSTEM VIEW

  • "Foundation" Capabilities that are required by other required capabilities and/or depended on by many other capabilities
  • "Atomic" Capability is unique and cannot be built out of other required capabilities
  • "Proximity" (sometimes called a Capability Cluster) selects for capabilities that are related to DefCore capabilities. This helps ensure that related capabilities are managed together.

NON-ADMIN

The original 13th "non-admin" criteria has been removed because Admin APIs cannot be used for interoperability and are not considered DefCore.