be2724a655
Applying RST formatting conventions [1],[2] and [3] [1] http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/rst-conv/gen-guidelines.html [2] http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/rst-conv/inline-markups.html [3] http://docs.openstack.org/contributor-guide/rst-conv/lists.html Change-Id: I38b77a45d30ca0542058675dd1e8aba790c68567 Partially-implements: blueprint documentation-rework
2.8 KiB
Kolla Security
Non Root containers
The OpenStack services, with a few exceptions, run as non root inside of Kolla's containers. Kolla uses the Docker provided USER flag to set the appropriate user for each serivce.
SELinux
The state of SELinux in Kolla is a work in progress. The short answer is you must disable it until selinux polices are written for the Docker containers.
To understand why Kolla needs to set certain selinux policies for services that you wouldn't expect to need them (rabbitmq, mariadb, glance, etc.) we must take a step back and talk about Docker.
Docker has not had the concept of persistent containerized data until recently. This means when a container is run the data it creates is destroyed when the container goes away, which is obviously no good in the case of upgrades.
It was suggested data containers could solve this issue by only holding data if they were never recreated, leading to a scary state where you could lose access to your data if the wrong command was executed. The real answer to this problem came in Docker 1.9 with the introduction of named volumes. You could now address volumes directly by name removing the need for so called data containers all together.
Another solution to the persistent data issue is to use a host bind
mount which involves making, for sake of example, host directory
var/lib/mysql available inside the container at
var/lib/mysql. This absolutely solves the problem of
persistent data, but it introduces another security issue, permissions.
With this host bind mount solution the data in
var/lib/mysql will be owned by the mysql user in the
container. Unfortunately, that mysql user in the container could have
any UID/GID and thats who will own the data outside the container
introducing a potential security risk. Additionally, this method dirties
the host and requires host permissions to the directories to bind
mount.
The solution Kolla chose is named volumes.
Why does this matter in the case of selinux? Kolla does not run the process it is launching as root in most cases. So glance-api is run as the glance user, and mariadb is run as the mysql user, and so on. When mounting a named volume in the location that the persistent data will be stored it will be owned by the root user and group. The mysql user has no permissions to write to this folder now. What Kolla does is allow a select few commands to be run with sudo as the mysql user. This allows the mysql user to chown a specific, explicit directory and store its data in a named volume without the security risk and other downsides of host bind mounts. The downside to this is selinux blocks those sudo commands and it will do so until we make explicit policies to allow those operations.