Reference TC doc on licensing
Our licensing stance is slightly more nuanced than was described here. Reference the external TC statement on licensing requirements rather than trying to re-describe it here. Change-Id: I5ffb95c153967decb89890f5132a2819ad569308
This commit is contained in:
parent
2f722d7445
commit
252c0a035d
@ -275,8 +275,7 @@ For new Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Is the library license compatible?
|
||||
|
||||
Preferably Apache2, BSD, MIT licensed. LGPL is ok. GPL or AGPL is
|
||||
verboten. Any other oddball license should be rejected.
|
||||
The library should be licensed as described in `Licensing requirements`_.
|
||||
|
||||
- Is the library already packaged in the distros we target (Ubuntu
|
||||
latest / Fedora latest)?
|
||||
@ -297,6 +296,8 @@ For new Requirements
|
||||
transition plan to drop the old library in a reasonable amount of
|
||||
time.
|
||||
|
||||
.. _Licensing requirements: http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html
|
||||
|
||||
For Upgrading Requirements Versions
|
||||
-----------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user