openstack/requirements
Code Issues Proposed changes

Reference TC doc on licensing

Browse Source 
Our licensing stance is slightly more nuanced than was described
here.  Reference the external TC statement on licensing requirements
rather than trying to re-describe it here.

Change-Id: I5ffb95c153967decb89890f5132a2819ad569308
This commit is contained in:
James E. Blair 2016-02-14 08:06:36 -08:00
parent 2f722d7445
commit 252c0a035d
1 changed files with 3 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
README.rst
View File

@ -275,8 +275,7 @@ For new Requirements
- Is the library license compatible? - Is the library license compatible?
Preferably Apache2, BSD, MIT licensed. LGPL is ok. GPL or AGPL is The library should be licensed as described in `Licensing requirements`_.
verboten. Any other oddball license should be rejected.
- Is the library already packaged in the distros we target (Ubuntu - Is the library already packaged in the distros we target (Ubuntu
latest / Fedora latest)? latest / Fedora latest)?
@ -297,6 +296,8 @@ For new Requirements
transition plan to drop the old library in a reasonable amount of transition plan to drop the old library in a reasonable amount of
time. time.
.. _Licensing requirements: http://governance.openstack.org/reference/licensing.html
For Upgrading Requirements Versions For Upgrading Requirements Versions
----------------------------------- -----------------------------------