swift/doc/source/admin_guide.rst
2010-10-13 11:28:27 -05:00

10 KiB

Administrator's Guide

Managing the Rings

Removing a device from the ring:

swift-ring-builder <builder-file> remove <ip_address>/<device_name>

Removing a server from the ring:

swift-ring-builder <builder-file> remove <ip_address>

Adding devices to the ring:

See ring-preparing

See what devices for a server are in the ring:

swift-ring-builder <builder-file> search <ip_address>

Once you are done with all changes to the ring, the changes need to be "committed":

swift-ring-builder <builder-file> rebalance

Once the new rings are built, they should be pushed out to all the servers in the cluster.

Handling System Updates

It is recommended that system updates and reboots are done a zone at a time. This allows the update to happen, and for the Swift cluster to stay available and responsive to requests. It is also advisable when updating a zone, let it run for a while before updating the other zones to make sure the update doesn't have any adverse effects.

Handling Drive Failure

In the event that a drive has failed, the first step is to make sure the drive is unmounted. This will make it easier for swift to work around the failure until it has been resolved. If the drive is going to be replaced immediately, then it is just best to replace the drive, format it, remount it, and let replication fill it up.

If the drive can't be replaced immediately, then it is best to leave it unmounted, and remove the drive from the ring. This will allow all the replicas that were on that drive to be replicated elsewhere until the drive is replaced. Once the drive is replaced, it can be re-added to the ring.

Handling Server Failure

If a server is having hardware issues, it is a good idea to make sure the swift services are not running. This will allow Swift to work around the failure while you troubleshoot.

If the server just needs a reboot, or a small amount of work that should only last a couple of hours, then it is probably best to let Swift work around the failure and get the machine fixed and back online. When the machine comes back online, replication will make sure that anything that is missing during the downtime will get updated.

If the server has more serious issues, then it is probably best to remove all of the server's devices from the ring. Once the server has been repaired and is back online, the server's devices can be added back into the ring. It is important that the devices are reformatted before putting them back into the ring as it is likely to be responsible for a different set of partitions than before.

Detecting Failed Drives

It has been our experience that when a drive is about to fail, error messages will spew into /var/log/kern.log. There is a script called swift-drive-audit that can be run via cron to watch for bad drives. If errors are detected, it will unmount the bad drive, so that Swift can work around it. The script takes a configuration file with the following settings:

[drive-audit]

Option Default Description
log_facility LOG_LOCAL0 Syslog log facility
log_level INFO Log level
device_dir /srv/node Directory devices are mounted under

minutes

60

Number of minutes to look back in /var/log/kern.log

error_limit

1

Number of errors to find before a device is unmounted

This script has only been tested on Ubuntu 10.04, so if you are using a different distro or OS, some care should be taken before using in production.

Cluster Health

There is a swift-stats-report tool for measuring overall cluster health. This is accomplished by checking if a set of deliberately distributed containers and objects are currently in their proper places within the cluster.

For instance, a common deployment has three replicas of each object. The health of that object can be measured by checking if each replica is in its proper place. If only 2 of the 3 is in place the object's heath can be said to be at 66.66%, where 100% would be perfect.

A single object's health, especially an older object, usually reflects the health of that entire partition the object is in. If we make enough objects on a distinct percentage of the partitions in the cluster, we can get a pretty valid estimate of the overall cluster health. In practice, about 1% partition coverage seems to balance well between accuracy and the amount of time it takes to gather results.

The first thing that needs to be done to provide this health value is create a new account solely for this usage. Next, we need to place the containers and objects throughout the system so that they are on distinct partitions. The swift-stats-populate tool does this by making up random container and object names until they fall on distinct partitions. Last, and repeatedly for the life of the cluster, we need to run the swift-stats-report tool to check the health of each of these containers and objects.

These tools need direct access to the entire cluster and to the ring files (installing them on an auth server or a proxy server will probably do). Both swift-stats-populate and swift-stats-report use the same configuration file, /etc/swift/stats.conf. Example conf file:

[stats]
auth_url = http://saio:11000/v1.0
auth_user = test:tester
auth_key = testing

There are also options for the conf file for specifying the dispersion coverage (defaults to 1%), retries, concurrency, CSV output file, etc. though usually the defaults are fine.

Once the configuration is in place, run swift-stats-populate -d to populate the containers and objects throughout the cluster.

Now that those containers and objects are in place, you can run swift-stats-report -d to get a dispersion report, or the overall health of the cluster. Here is an example of a cluster in perfect health:

$ swift-stats-report -d
Queried 2621 containers for dispersion reporting, 19s, 0 retries
100.00% of container copies found (7863 of 7863)
Sample represents 1.00% of the container partition space

Queried 2619 objects for dispersion reporting, 7s, 0 retries
100.00% of object copies found (7857 of 7857)
Sample represents 1.00% of the object partition space

Now I'll deliberately double the weight of a device in the object ring (with replication turned off) and rerun the dispersion report to show what impact that has:

$ swift-ring-builder object.builder set_weight d0 200
$ swift-ring-builder object.builder rebalance
...
$ swift-stats-report -d
Queried 2621 containers for dispersion reporting, 8s, 0 retries
100.00% of container copies found (7863 of 7863)
Sample represents 1.00% of the container partition space

Queried 2619 objects for dispersion reporting, 7s, 0 retries
There were 1763 partitions missing one copy.
77.56% of object copies found (6094 of 7857)
Sample represents 1.00% of the object partition space

You can see the health of the objects in the cluster has gone down significantly. Of course, I only have four devices in this test environment, in a production environment with many many devices the impact of one device change is much less. Next, I'll run the replicators to get everything put back into place and then rerun the dispersion report:

... start object replicators and monitor logs until they're caught up ...
$ swift-stats-report -d
Queried 2621 containers for dispersion reporting, 17s, 0 retries
100.00% of container copies found (7863 of 7863)
Sample represents 1.00% of the container partition space

Queried 2619 objects for dispersion reporting, 7s, 0 retries
100.00% of object copies found (7857 of 7857)
Sample represents 1.00% of the object partition space

So that's a summation of how to use swift-stats-report to monitor the health of a cluster. There are a few other things it can do, such as performance monitoring, but those are currently in their infancy and little used. For instance, you can run swift-stats-populate -p and swift-stats-report -p to get performance timings (warning: the initial populate takes a while). These timings are dumped into a CSV file (/etc/swift/stats.csv by default) and can then be graphed to see how cluster performance is trending.

Debugging Tips and Tools

When a request is made to Swift, it is given a unique transaction id. This id should be in every log line that has to do with that request. This can be useful when looking at all the services that are hit by a single request.

If you need to know where a specific account, container or object is in the cluster, swift-get-nodes will show the location where each replica should be.

If you are looking at an object on the server and need more info, swift-object-info will display the account, container, replica locations and metadata of the object.

If you want to audit the data for an account, swift-account-audit can be used to crawl the account, checking that all containers and objects can be found.

Managing Services

Swift services are generally managed with swift-init. the general usage is swift-init <service> <command>, where service is the swift service to manage (for example object, container, account, proxy) and command is one of:

Command Description
start Start the service
stop Stop the service
restart Restart the service
shutdown Attempt to gracefully shutdown the service
reload Attempt to gracefully restart the service

A graceful shutdown or reload will finish any current requests before completely stopping the old service. There is also a special case of swift-init all <command>, which will run the command for all swift services.