df00122e74
Update the doc link brought by the doc migration. Although we had some effort to fix these, it still left lots of bad doc link, I separate these changes into 3 patches aim to fix all of these, this is the 2st patch for doc/manpages. Change-Id: Id426c5dd45a812ef801042834c93701bb6e63a05
612 lines
26 KiB
ReStructuredText
612 lines
26 KiB
ReStructuredText
=================
|
|
Object Encryption
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
Swift supports the optional encryption of object data at rest on storage nodes.
|
|
The encryption of object data is intended to mitigate the risk of users' data
|
|
being read if an unauthorised party were to gain physical access to a disk.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Swift's data-at-rest encryption accepts plaintext object data from the
|
|
client, encrypts it in the cluster, and stores the encrypted data. This
|
|
protects object data from inadvertently being exposed if a data drive
|
|
leaves the Swift cluster. If a user wishes to ensure that the plaintext
|
|
data is always encrypted while in transit and in storage, it is strongly
|
|
recommended that the data be encrypted before sending it to the Swift
|
|
cluster. Encrypting on the client side is the only way to ensure that the
|
|
data is fully encrypted for its entire lifecycle.
|
|
|
|
Encryption of data at rest is implemented by middleware that may be included in
|
|
the proxy server WSGI pipeline. The feature is internal to a Swift cluster and
|
|
not exposed through the API. Clients are unaware that data is encrypted by this
|
|
feature internally to the Swift service; internally encrypted data should never
|
|
be returned to clients via the Swift API.
|
|
|
|
The following data are encrypted while at rest in Swift:
|
|
|
|
* Object content i.e. the content of an object PUT request's body
|
|
* The entity tag (ETag) of objects that have non-zero content
|
|
* All custom user object metadata values i.e. metadata sent using
|
|
X-Object-Meta- prefixed headers with PUT or POST requests
|
|
|
|
Any data or metadata not included in the list above are not encrypted,
|
|
including:
|
|
|
|
* Account, container and object names
|
|
* Account and container custom user metadata values
|
|
* All custom user metadata names
|
|
* Object Content-Type values
|
|
* Object size
|
|
* System metadata
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
This feature is intended to provide `confidentiality` of data that is at
|
|
rest i.e. to protect user data from being read by an attacker that gains
|
|
access to disks on which object data is stored.
|
|
|
|
This feature is not intended to prevent undetectable `modification`
|
|
of user data at rest.
|
|
|
|
This feature is not intended to protect against an attacker that gains
|
|
access to Swift's internal network connections, or gains access to key
|
|
material or is able to modify the Swift code running on Swift nodes.
|
|
|
|
.. _encryption_deployment:
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
Deployment and operation
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
Encryption is deployed by adding two middleware filters to the proxy
|
|
server WSGI pipeline and including their respective filter configuration
|
|
sections in the `proxy-server.conf` file. :ref:`Additional steps
|
|
<container_sync_client_config>` are required if the container sync feature is
|
|
being used.
|
|
|
|
The `keymaster` and `encryption` middleware filters must be to the right of all
|
|
other middleware in the pipeline apart from the final proxy-logging middleware,
|
|
and in the order shown in this example::
|
|
|
|
<other middleware> keymaster encryption proxy-logging proxy-server
|
|
|
|
[filter:keymaster]
|
|
use = egg:swift#keymaster
|
|
encryption_root_secret = your_secret
|
|
|
|
[filter:encryption]
|
|
use = egg:swift#encryption
|
|
# disable_encryption = False
|
|
|
|
See the `proxy-server.conf-sample` file for further details on the middleware
|
|
configuration options.
|
|
|
|
The keymaster config option ``encryption_root_secret`` MUST be set to a value
|
|
of at least 44 valid base-64 characters before the middleware is used and
|
|
should be consistent across all proxy servers. The minimum length of 44 has
|
|
been chosen because it is the length of a base-64 encoded 32 byte value.
|
|
Alternatives to specifying the encryption root secret directly in the
|
|
`proxy-server.conf` file are storing it in a separate file, or storing it in
|
|
an :ref:`external key management system
|
|
<encryption_root_secret_in_external_kms>` such as `Barbican
|
|
<https://docs.openstack.org/barbican>`_.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
The ``encryption_root_secret`` option holds the master secret key used for
|
|
encryption. The security of all encrypted data critically depends on this
|
|
key and it should therefore be set to a high-entropy value. For example, a
|
|
suitable ``encryption_root_secret`` may be obtained by base-64 encoding a
|
|
32 byte (or longer) value generated by a cryptographically secure random
|
|
number generator.
|
|
|
|
The ``encryption_root_secret`` value is necessary to recover any encrypted
|
|
data from the storage system, and therefore, it must be guarded against
|
|
accidental loss. Its value (and consequently, the proxy-server.conf file)
|
|
should not be stored on any disk that is in any account, container or
|
|
object ring.
|
|
|
|
The ``encryption_root_secret`` value should not be changed once deployed.
|
|
Doing so would prevent Swift from properly decrypting data that was
|
|
encrypted using the former value, and would therefore result in the loss of
|
|
that data.
|
|
|
|
One method for generating a suitable value for ``encryption_root_secret`` is to
|
|
use the ``openssl`` command line tool::
|
|
|
|
openssl rand -base64 32
|
|
|
|
Once deployed, the encryption filter will by default encrypt object data and
|
|
metadata when handling PUT and POST requests and decrypt object data and
|
|
metadata when handling GET and HEAD requests. COPY requests are transformed
|
|
into GET and PUT requests by the :ref:`copy` middleware before reaching the
|
|
encryption middleware and as a result object data and metadata is decrypted and
|
|
re-encrypted when copied.
|
|
|
|
.. _encryption_root_secret_in_external_kms:
|
|
|
|
Encryption Root Secret in External Key Management System
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The benefits of using
|
|
a dedicated system for storing the encryption root secret include the
|
|
auditing and access control infrastructure that are already in place in such a
|
|
system, and the fact that an encryption root secret stored in a key management
|
|
system (KMS) may be backed by a hardware security module (HSM) for additional
|
|
security. Another significant benefit of storing the root encryption secret in
|
|
an external KMS is that it is in this case never stored on a disk in the Swift
|
|
cluster.
|
|
|
|
Make sure the required dependencies are installed for retrieving an encryption
|
|
root secret from an external KMS. This can be done when installing Swift (add
|
|
the ``-e`` flag to install as a development version) by changing to the Swift
|
|
directory and running the following command to install Swift together with
|
|
the ``kms_keymaster`` extra dependencies::
|
|
|
|
sudo pip install .[kms_keymaster]
|
|
|
|
Another way to install the dependencies is by making sure the
|
|
following lines exist in the requirements.txt file, and installing them using
|
|
``pip install -r requirements.txt``::
|
|
|
|
cryptography>=1.6 # BSD/Apache-2.0
|
|
castellan>=0.6.0
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
If any of the required packages is already installed, the ``--upgrade``
|
|
flag may be required for the ``pip`` commands in order for the required
|
|
minimum version to be installed.
|
|
|
|
To make use of an encryption root secret stored in an external KMS,
|
|
replace the keymaster middleware with the kms_keymaster middleware in the
|
|
proxy server WSGI pipeline in `proxy-server.conf`, in the order shown in this
|
|
example::
|
|
|
|
<other middleware> kms_keymaster encryption proxy-logging proxy-server
|
|
|
|
and add a section to the same file::
|
|
|
|
[filter:kms_keymaster]
|
|
use = egg:swift#kms_keymaster
|
|
keymaster_config_path = file_with_kms_keymaster_config
|
|
|
|
Create or edit the file `file_with_kms_keymaster_config` referenced above.
|
|
For further details on the middleware configuration options, see the
|
|
`keymaster.conf-sample` file. An example of the content of this file, with
|
|
optional parameters omitted, is below::
|
|
|
|
[kms_keymaster]
|
|
key_id = changeme
|
|
username = swift
|
|
password = password
|
|
project_name = swift
|
|
auth_endpoint = http://keystonehost:5000/v3
|
|
|
|
The encryption root secret shall be created and stored in the external key
|
|
management system before it can be used by the keymaster. It shall be stored
|
|
as a symmetric key, with content type ``application/octet-stream``,
|
|
``base64`` content encoding, ``AES`` algorithm, bit length ``256``, and secret
|
|
type ``symmetric``. The mode ``ctr`` may also be stored for informational
|
|
purposes - it is not currently checked by the keymaster.
|
|
|
|
The following command can be used to store the currently configured
|
|
``encryption_root_secret`` value from the `proxy-server.conf` file
|
|
in Barbican::
|
|
|
|
openstack secret store --name swift_root_secret \
|
|
--payload-content-type="application/octet-stream" \
|
|
--payload-content-encoding="base64" --algorithm aes --bit-length 256 \
|
|
--mode ctr --secret-type symmetric --payload <base64_encoded_root_secret>
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, the existing root secret can also be stored in Barbican using
|
|
`curl <http://developer.openstack.org/api-guide/key-manager/secrets.html>`__.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
The credentials used to store the secret in Barbican shall be the same
|
|
ones that the proxy server uses to retrieve the secret, i.e., the ones
|
|
configured in the `keymaster.conf` file. For clarity reasons the commands
|
|
shown here omit the credentials - they may be specified explicitly, or in
|
|
environment variables.
|
|
|
|
Instead of using an existing root secret, Barbican can also be asked to
|
|
generate a new 256-bit root secret, with content type
|
|
``application/octet-stream`` and algorithm ``AES`` (the ``mode`` parameter is
|
|
currently optional)::
|
|
|
|
openstack secret order create --name swift_root_secret \
|
|
--payload-content-type="application/octet-stream" --algorithm aes \
|
|
--bit-length 256 --mode ctr key
|
|
|
|
The ``order create`` creates an asynchronous request to create the actual
|
|
secret.
|
|
The order can be retrieved using ``openstack secret order get``, and once the
|
|
order completes successfully, the output will show the key id of the generated
|
|
root secret.
|
|
Keys currently stored in Barbican can be listed using the
|
|
``openstack secret list`` command.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Both the order (the asynchronous request for creating or storing a secret),
|
|
and the actual secret itself, have similar unique identifiers. Once the
|
|
order has been completed, the key id is shown in the output of the ``order
|
|
get`` command.
|
|
|
|
The keymaster uses the explicitly configured username and password (and
|
|
project name etc.) from the `keymaster.conf` file for retrieving the encryption
|
|
root secret from an external key management system. The `Castellan library
|
|
<https://docs.openstack.org/castellan/latest/>`_ is used to communicate with
|
|
Barbican.
|
|
|
|
For the proxy server, reading the encryption root secret directly from the
|
|
`proxy-server.conf` file, from the `keymaster.conf` file pointed to
|
|
from the `proxy-server.conf` file, or from an external key management system
|
|
such as Barbican, are all functionally equivalent. In case reading the
|
|
encryption root secret from the external key management system fails, the
|
|
proxy server will not start up. If the encryption root secret is retrieved
|
|
successfully, it is cached in memory in the proxy server.
|
|
|
|
For further details on the configuration options, see the
|
|
`[filter:kms_keymaster]` section in the `proxy-server.conf-sample` file, and
|
|
the `keymaster.conf-sample` file.
|
|
|
|
Upgrade Considerations
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
When upgrading an existing cluster to deploy encryption, the following sequence
|
|
of steps is recommended:
|
|
|
|
#. Upgrade all object servers
|
|
#. Upgrade all proxy servers
|
|
#. Add keymaster and encryption middlewares to every proxy server's middleware
|
|
pipeline with the encryption ``disable_encryption`` option set to ``True``
|
|
and the keymaster ``encryption_root_secret`` value set as described above.
|
|
#. If required, follow the steps for :ref:`container_sync_client_config`.
|
|
#. Finally, change the encryption ``disable_encryption`` option to ``False``
|
|
|
|
Objects that existed in the cluster prior to the keymaster and encryption
|
|
middlewares being deployed are still readable with GET and HEAD requests. The
|
|
content of those objects will not be encrypted unless they are written again by
|
|
a PUT or COPY request. Any user metadata of those objects will not be encrypted
|
|
unless it is written again by a PUT, POST or COPY request.
|
|
|
|
Disabling Encryption
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Once deployed, the keymaster and encryption middlewares should not be removed
|
|
from the pipeline. To do so will cause encrypted object data and/or metadata to
|
|
be returned in response to GET or HEAD requests for objects that were
|
|
previously encrypted.
|
|
|
|
Encryption of inbound object data may be disabled by setting the encryption
|
|
``disable_encryption`` option to ``True``, in which case existing encrypted
|
|
objects will remain encrypted but new data written with PUT, POST or COPY
|
|
requests will not be encrypted. The keymaster and encryption middlewares should
|
|
remain in the pipeline even when encryption of new objects is not required. The
|
|
encryption middleware is needed to handle GET requests for objects that may
|
|
have been previously encrypted. The keymaster is needed to provide keys for
|
|
those requests.
|
|
|
|
.. _container_sync_client_config:
|
|
|
|
Container sync configuration
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
If container sync is being used then the keymaster and encryption middlewares
|
|
must be added to the container sync internal client pipeline. The following
|
|
configuration steps are required:
|
|
|
|
#. Create a custom internal client configuration file for container sync (if
|
|
one is not already in use) based on the sample file
|
|
`internal-client.conf-sample`. For example, copy
|
|
`internal-client.conf-sample` to `/etc/swift/container-sync-client.conf`.
|
|
#. Modify this file to include the middlewares in the pipeline in
|
|
the same way as described above for the proxy server.
|
|
#. Modify the container-sync section of all container server config files to
|
|
point to this internal client config file using the
|
|
``internal_client_conf_path`` option. For example::
|
|
|
|
internal_client_conf_path = /etc/swift/container-sync-client.conf
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
The ``encryption_root_secret`` value is necessary to recover any encrypted
|
|
data from the storage system, and therefore, it must be guarded against
|
|
accidental loss. Its value (and consequently, the custom internal client
|
|
configuration file) should not be stored on any disk that is in any
|
|
account, container or object ring.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
These container sync configuration steps will be necessary for container
|
|
sync probe tests to pass if the encryption middlewares are included in the
|
|
proxy pipeline of a test cluster.
|
|
|
|
--------------
|
|
Implementation
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
Encryption scheme
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
Plaintext data is encrypted to ciphertext using the AES cipher with 256-bit
|
|
keys implemented by the python `cryptography package
|
|
<https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cryptography>`_. The cipher is used in counter
|
|
(CTR) mode so that any byte or range of bytes in the ciphertext may be
|
|
decrypted independently of any other bytes in the ciphertext. This enables very
|
|
simple handling of ranged GETs.
|
|
|
|
In general an item of unencrypted data, ``plaintext``, is transformed to an
|
|
item of encrypted data, ``ciphertext``::
|
|
|
|
ciphertext = E(plaintext, k, iv)
|
|
|
|
where ``E`` is the encryption function, ``k`` is an encryption key and ``iv``
|
|
is a unique initialization vector (IV) chosen for each encryption context. For
|
|
example, the object body is one encryption context with a randomly chosen IV.
|
|
The IV is stored as metadata of the encrypted item so that it is available for
|
|
decryption::
|
|
|
|
plaintext = D(ciphertext, k, iv)
|
|
|
|
where ``D`` is the decryption function.
|
|
|
|
The implementation of CTR mode follows `NIST SP800-38A
|
|
<http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-38a/sp800-38a.pdf>`_, and the
|
|
full IV passed to the encryption or decryption function serves as the initial
|
|
counter block.
|
|
|
|
In general any encrypted item has accompanying crypto-metadata that describes
|
|
the IV and the cipher algorithm used for the encryption::
|
|
|
|
crypto_metadata = {"iv": <16 byte value>,
|
|
"cipher": "AES_CTR_256"}
|
|
|
|
This crypto-metadata is stored either with the ciphertext (for user
|
|
metadata and etags) or as a separate header (for object bodies).
|
|
|
|
Key management
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
A keymaster middleware is responsible for providing the keys required for each
|
|
encryption and decryption operation. Two keys are required when handling object
|
|
requests: a `container key` that is uniquely associated with the container path
|
|
and an `object key` that is uniquely associated with the object path. These
|
|
keys are made available to the encryption middleware via a callback function
|
|
that the keymaster installs in the WSGI request environ.
|
|
|
|
The current keymaster implementation derives container and object keys from the
|
|
``encryption_root_secret`` in a deterministic way by constructing a SHA256
|
|
HMAC using the ``encryption_root_secret`` as a key and the container or object
|
|
path as a message, for example::
|
|
|
|
object_key = HMAC(encryption_root_secret, "/a/c/o")
|
|
|
|
Other strategies for providing object and container keys may be employed by
|
|
future implementations of alternative keymaster middleware.
|
|
|
|
During each object PUT, a random key is generated to encrypt the object body.
|
|
This random key is then encrypted using the object key provided by the
|
|
keymaster. This makes it safe to store the encrypted random key alongside the
|
|
encrypted object data and metadata.
|
|
|
|
This process of `key wrapping` enables more efficient re-keying events when the
|
|
object key may need to be replaced and consequently any data encrypted using
|
|
that key must be re-encrypted. Key wrapping minimizes the amount of data
|
|
encrypted using those keys to just other randomly chosen keys which can be
|
|
re-wrapped efficiently without needing to re-encrypt the larger amounts of data
|
|
that were encrypted using the random keys.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
|
|
Re-keying is not currently implemented. Key wrapping is implemented
|
|
in anticipation of future re-keying operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Encryption middleware
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
The encryption middleware is composed of an `encrypter` component and a
|
|
`decrypter` component.
|
|
|
|
Encrypter operation
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
Custom user metadata
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
The encrypter encrypts each item of custom user metadata using the object key
|
|
provided by the keymaster and an IV that is randomly chosen for that metadata
|
|
item. The encrypted values are stored as :ref:`transient_sysmeta` with
|
|
associated crypto-metadata appended to the encrypted value. For example::
|
|
|
|
X-Object-Meta-Private1: value1
|
|
X-Object-Meta-Private2: value2
|
|
|
|
are transformed to::
|
|
|
|
X-Object-Transient-Sysmeta-Crypto-Meta-Private1:
|
|
E(value1, object_key, header_iv_1); swift_meta={"iv": header_iv_1,
|
|
"cipher": "AES_CTR_256"}
|
|
X-Object-Transient-Sysmeta-Crypto-Meta-Private2:
|
|
E(value2, object_key, header_iv_2); swift_meta={"iv": header_iv_2,
|
|
"cipher": "AES_CTR_256"}
|
|
|
|
The unencrypted custom user metadata headers are removed.
|
|
|
|
Object body
|
|
+++++++++++
|
|
|
|
Encryption of an object body is performed using a randomly chosen body key
|
|
and a randomly chosen IV::
|
|
|
|
body_ciphertext = E(body_plaintext, body_key, body_iv)
|
|
|
|
The body_key is wrapped using the object key provided by the keymaster and a
|
|
randomly chosen IV::
|
|
|
|
wrapped_body_key = E(body_key, object_key, body_key_iv)
|
|
|
|
The encrypter stores the associated crypto-metadata in a system metadata
|
|
header::
|
|
|
|
X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Body-Meta:
|
|
{"iv": body_iv,
|
|
"cipher": "AES_CTR_256",
|
|
"body_key": {"key": wrapped_body_key,
|
|
"iv": body_key_iv}}
|
|
|
|
Note that in this case there is an extra item of crypto-metadata which stores
|
|
the wrapped body key and its IV.
|
|
|
|
Entity tag
|
|
++++++++++
|
|
|
|
While encrypting the object body the encrypter also calculates the ETag (md5
|
|
digest) of the plaintext body. This value is encrypted using the object key
|
|
provided by the keymaster and a randomly chosen IV, and saved as an item of
|
|
system metadata, with associated crypto-metadata appended to the encrypted
|
|
value::
|
|
|
|
X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag:
|
|
E(md5(plaintext), object_key, etag_iv); swift_meta={"iv": etag_iv,
|
|
"cipher": "AES_CTR_256"}
|
|
|
|
The encrypter also forces an encrypted version of the plaintext ETag to be sent
|
|
with container updates by adding an update override header to the PUT request.
|
|
The associated crypto-metadata is appended to the encrypted ETag value of this
|
|
update override header::
|
|
|
|
X-Object-Sysmeta-Container-Update-Override-Etag:
|
|
E(md5(plaintext), container_key, override_etag_iv);
|
|
meta={"iv": override_etag_iv, "cipher": "AES_CTR_256"}
|
|
|
|
The container key is used for this encryption so that the decrypter is able
|
|
to decrypt the ETags in container listings when handling a container request,
|
|
since object keys may not be available in that context.
|
|
|
|
Since the plaintext ETag value is only known once the encrypter has completed
|
|
processing the entire object body, the ``X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag`` and
|
|
``X-Object-Sysmeta-Container-Update-Override-Etag`` headers are sent after the
|
|
encrypted object body using the proxy server's support for request footers.
|
|
|
|
.. _conditional_requests:
|
|
|
|
Conditional Requests
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
In general, an object server evaluates conditional requests with
|
|
``If[-None]-Match`` headers by comparing values listed in an
|
|
``If[-None]-Match`` header against the ETag that is stored in the object
|
|
metadata. This is not possible when the ETag stored in object metadata has been
|
|
encrypted. The encrypter therefore calculates an HMAC using the object key and
|
|
the ETag while handling object PUT requests, and stores this under the metadata
|
|
key ``X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag-Mac``::
|
|
|
|
X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag-Mac: HMAC(object_key, md5(plaintext))
|
|
|
|
Like other ETag-related metadata, this is sent after the encrypted object body
|
|
using the proxy server's support for request footers.
|
|
|
|
The encrypter similarly calculates an HMAC for each ETag value included in
|
|
``If[-None]-Match`` headers of conditional GET or HEAD requests, and appends
|
|
these to the ``If[-None]-Match`` header. The encrypter also sets the
|
|
``X-Backend-Etag-Is-At`` header to point to the previously stored
|
|
``X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag-Mac`` metadata so that the object server
|
|
evaluates the conditional request by comparing the HMAC values included in the
|
|
``If[-None]-Match`` with the value stored under
|
|
``X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag-Mac``. For example, given a conditional request
|
|
with header::
|
|
|
|
If-Match: match_etag
|
|
|
|
the encrypter would transform the request headers to include::
|
|
|
|
If-Match: match_etag,HMAC(object_key, match_etag)
|
|
X-Backend-Etag-Is-At: X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag-Mac
|
|
|
|
This enables the object server to perform an encrypted comparison to check
|
|
whether the ETags match, without leaking the ETag itself or leaking information
|
|
about the object body.
|
|
|
|
Decrypter operation
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
For each GET or HEAD request to an object, the decrypter inspects the response
|
|
for encrypted items (revealed by crypto-metadata headers), and if any are
|
|
discovered then it will:
|
|
|
|
#. Fetch the object and container keys from the keymaster via its callback
|
|
#. Decrypt the ``X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Etag`` value
|
|
#. Decrypt the ``X-Object-Sysmeta-Container-Update-Override-Etag`` value
|
|
#. Decrypt metadata header values using the object key
|
|
#. Decrypt the wrapped body key found in ``X-Object-Sysmeta-Crypto-Body-Meta``
|
|
#. Decrypt the body using the body key
|
|
|
|
For each GET request to a container that would include ETags in its response
|
|
body, the decrypter will:
|
|
|
|
#. GET the response body with the container listing
|
|
#. Fetch the container key from the keymaster via its callback
|
|
#. Decrypt any encrypted ETag entries in the container listing using the
|
|
container key
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on other Swift services and features
|
|
-------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Encryption has no impact on :ref:`versioned_writes` other than that any
|
|
previously unencrypted objects will be encrypted as they are copied to or from
|
|
the versions container. Keymaster and encryption middlewares should be placed
|
|
after ``versioned_writes`` in the proxy server pipeline, as described in
|
|
:ref:`encryption_deployment`.
|
|
|
|
`Container Sync` uses an internal client to GET objects that are to be sync'd.
|
|
This internal client must be configured to use the keymaster and encryption
|
|
middlewares as described :ref:`above <container_sync_client_config>`.
|
|
|
|
Encryption has no impact on the `object-auditor` service. Since the ETag
|
|
header saved with the object at rest is the md5 sum of the encrypted object
|
|
body then the auditor will verify that encrypted data is valid.
|
|
|
|
Encryption has no impact on the `object-expirer` service. ``X-Delete-At`` and
|
|
``X-Delete-After`` headers are not encrypted.
|
|
|
|
Encryption has no impact on the `object-replicator` and `object-reconstructor`
|
|
services. These services are unaware of the object or EC fragment data being
|
|
encrypted.
|
|
|
|
Encryption has no impact on the `container-reconciler` service. The
|
|
`container-reconciler` uses an internal client to move objects between
|
|
different policy rings. The destination object has the same URL as the source
|
|
object and the object is moved without re-encryption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Considerations for developers
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Developers should be aware that keymaster and encryption middlewares rely on
|
|
the path of an object remaining unchanged. The included keymaster derives keys
|
|
for containers and objects based on their paths and the
|
|
``encryption_root_secret``. The keymaster does not rely on object metadata to
|
|
inform its generation of keys for GET and HEAD requests because when handling
|
|
:ref:`conditional_requests` it is required to provide the object key before any
|
|
metadata has been read from the object.
|
|
|
|
Developers should therefore give careful consideration to any new features that
|
|
would relocate object data and metadata within a Swift cluster by means that do
|
|
not cause the object data and metadata to pass through the encryption
|
|
middlewares in the proxy pipeline and be re-encrypted.
|
|
|
|
The crypto-metadata associated with each encrypted item does include some
|
|
`key_id` metadata that is provided by the keymaster and contains the path used
|
|
to derive keys. This `key_id` metadata is persisted in anticipation of future
|
|
scenarios when it may be necessary to decrypt an object that has been relocated
|
|
without re-encrypting, in which case the metadata could be used to derive the
|
|
keys that were used for encryption. However, this alone is not sufficient to
|
|
handle conditional requests and to decrypt container listings where objects
|
|
have been relocated, and further work will be required to solve those issues.
|