This patch adds methods to increase the partition power of an existing object ring without downtime for the users using a 3-step process. Data won't be moved to other nodes; objects using the new increased partition power will be located on the same device and are hardlinked to avoid data movement. 1. A new setting "next_part_power" will be added to the rings, and once the proxy server reloaded the rings it will send this value to the object servers on any write operation. Object servers will now create a hard-link in the new location to the original DiskFile object. Already existing data will be relinked using a new tool in the new locations using hardlinks. 2. The actual partition power itself will be increased. Servers will now use the new partition power to read from and write to. No longer required hard links in the old object location have to be removed now by the relinker tool; the relinker tool reads the next_part_power setting to find object locations that need to be cleaned up. 3. The "next_part_power" flag will be removed. This mostly implements the spec in [1]; however it's not using an "epoch" as described there. The idea of the epoch was to store data using different partition powers in their own namespace to avoid conflicts with auditors and replicators as well as being able to abort such an operation and just remove the new tree. This would require some heavy change of the on-disk data layout, and other object-server implementations would be required to adopt this scheme too. Instead the object-replicator is now aware that there is a partition power increase in progress and will skip replication of data in that storage policy; the relinker tool should be simply run and afterwards the partition power will be increased. This shouldn't take that much time (it's only walking the filesystem and hardlinking); impact should be low therefore. The relinker should be run on all storage nodes at the same time in parallel to decrease the required time (though this is not mandatory). Failures during relinking should not affect cluster operations - relinking can be even aborted manually and restarted later. Auditors are not quarantining objects written to a path with a different partition power and therefore working as before (though they are reading each object twice in the worst case before the no longer needed hard links are removed). Co-Authored-By: Alistair Coles <alistair.coles@hpe.com> Co-Authored-By: Matthew Oliver <matt@oliver.net.au> Co-Authored-By: Tim Burke <tim.burke@gmail.com> [1] https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/swift-specs/specs/in_progress/ increasing_partition_power.html Change-Id: I7d6371a04f5c1c4adbb8733a71f3c177ee5448bb
7.3 KiB
Modifying Ring Partition Power
The ring partition power determines the on-disk location of data files and is selected when creating a new ring. In normal operation, it is a fixed value. This is because a different partition power results in a different on-disk location for all data files.
However, increasing the partition power by 1 can be done by choosing locations that are on the same disk. As a result, we can create hard-links for both the new and old locations, avoiding data movement without impacting availability.
To enable a partition power change without interrupting user access, object servers need to be aware of it in advance. Therefore a partition power change needs to be done in multiple steps.
Note
Do not increase the partition power on account and container rings. Increasing the partition power is only supported for object rings. Trying to increase the part_power for account and container rings will result in unavailability, maybe even data loss.
Caveats
Before increasing the partition power, consider the possible drawbacks. There are a few caveats when increasing the partition power:
- All hashes.pkl files will become invalid once hard links are created, and the replicators will need significantly more time on the first run after finishing the partition power increase.
- Object replicators will skip partitions during the partition power increase. Replicators are not aware of hard-links, and would simply copy the content; this would result in heavy data movement and the worst case would be that all data is stored twice.
- Due to the fact that each object will now be hard linked from two locations, many more inodes will be used - expect around twice the amount. You need to check the free inode count before increasing the partition power.
- Also, object auditors might read each object twice before cleanup removes the second hard link.
- Due to the new inodes more memory is needed to cache them, and your
object servers should have plenty of available memory to avoid running
out of inode cache. Setting
vfs_cache_pressure
to 1 might help with that. - All nodes in the cluster must run at least Swift version 2.13.0 or later.
Due to these caveats you should only increase the partition power if really needed, i.e. if the number of partitions per disk is extremely low and the data is distributed unevenly across disks.
1. Prepare partition power increase
The swift-ring-builder is used to prepare the ring for an upcoming
partition power increase. It will store a new variable
next_part_power
with the current partition power + 1.
Object servers recognize this, and hard links to the new location will
be created (or deleted) on every PUT or DELETE. This will make it
possible to access newly written objects using the future partition
power:
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> prepare_increase_partition_power
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> write_ring
Now you need to copy the updated .ring.gz to all nodes. Already existing data needs to be relinked too; therefore an operator has to run a relinker command on all object servers in this phase:
swift-object-relinker relink
Note
Start relinking after all the servers re-read the modified ring files, which normally happens within 15 seconds after writing a modified ring. Also, make sure the modified rings are pushed to all nodes running object services (replicators, reconstructors and reconcilers)- they have to skip partitions during relinking.
Relinking might take some time; while there is no data copied or actually moved, the tool still needs to walk the whole file system and create new hard links as required.
2. Increase partition power
Now that all existing data can be found using the new location, it's time to actually increase the partition power itself:
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> increase_partition_power
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> write_ring
Now you need to copy the updated .ring.gz again to all nodes. Object servers are now using the new, increased partition power and no longer create additional hard links.
Note
The object servers will create additional hard links for each modified or new object, and this requires more inodes.
Note
If you decide you don't want to increase the partition power, you should instead cancel the increase. It is not possible to revert this operation once started. To abort the partition power increase, execute the following commands, copy the updated .ring.gz files to all nodes and continue with 3. Cleanup afterwards:
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> cancel_increase_partition_power
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> write_ring
3. Cleanup
Existing hard links in the old locations need to be removed, and a cleanup tool is provided to do this. Run the following command on each storage node:
swift-object-relinker cleanup
Note
The cleanup must be finished within your object servers reclaim_age period (which is by default 1 week). Otherwise objects that have been overwritten between step #1 and step #2 and deleted afterwards can't be cleaned up anymore.
Afterwards it is required to update the rings one last time to inform servers that all steps to increase the partition power are done, and replicators should resume their job:
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> finish_increase_partition_power
swift-ring-builder <builder-file> write_ring
Now you need to copy the updated .ring.gz again to all nodes.
Background
An existing object that is currently located on partition X will be placed either on partition 2*X or 2*X+1 after the partition power is increased. The reason for this is the Ring.get_part() method, that does a bitwise shift to the right.
To avoid actual data movement to different disks or even nodes, the allocation of partitions to nodes needs to be changed. The allocation is pairwise due to the above mentioned new partition scheme. Therefore devices are allocated like this, with the partition being the index and the value being the device id:
old new
part dev part dev
---- --- ---- ---
0 0 0 0
1 0
1 3 2 3
3 3
2 7 4 7
5 7
3 5 6 5
7 5
4 2 8 2
9 2
5 1 10 1
11 1
There is a helper method to compute the new path, and the following example shows the mapping between old and new location:
>>> from swift.common.utils import replace_partition_in_path
>>> old='objects/16003/a38/fa0fcec07328d068e24ccbf2a62f2a38/1467658208.57179.data'
>>> replace_partition_in_path(old, 14)
'objects/16003/a38/fa0fcec07328d068e24ccbf2a62f2a38/1467658208.57179.data'
>>> replace_partition_in_path(old, 15)
'objects/32007/a38/fa0fcec07328d068e24ccbf2a62f2a38/1467658208.57179.data'
Using the original partition power (14) it returned the same path; however after an increase to 15 it returns the new path, and the new partition is 2*X+1 in this case.